Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis, João Carlos Gonçalves dos
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Amorim, Marlene Paula Castro, Melão, Nuno Filipe Rosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/17622
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature.
id RCAP_45dccad015fd132f80b4233254eaf8c1
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/17622
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and IssuesEngineeringSystematic literature reviewMulti-method approachDevelopmentTriangulationComplementarityQualitative researchThe purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar como os estudos contemporâneos sobre a engenharia estão a quebrar as fronteiras do conhecimento. Este artigo utiliza uma revisão sistemática da literatura para mostrar como a utilização de abordagens qualitativas multi-método pode oferecer resultados fiáveis e dar maior enfase às dimensões de desenvolvimento, triangulação e complementaridade. O artigo discute as novas dinâmicas que as investigações qualitativas oferecem ao domínio da engenharia, área que que tem sido amplamente negligenciada pela literatura.Academia MilitarRepositório ComumReis, João Carlos Gonçalves dosAmorim, Marlene Paula CastroMelão, Nuno Filipe Rosa2017-01-19T15:41:18Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/17622porReis, J., Amorim, M., & Melão, R. (2017). Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues. Proelium, VII (12), 275-2921645-8826info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-21T08:55:56Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/17622Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:54:36.285165Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues
title Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues
spellingShingle Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues
Reis, João Carlos Gonçalves dos
Engineering
Systematic literature review
Multi-method approach
Development
Triangulation
Complementarity
Qualitative research
title_short Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues
title_full Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues
title_fullStr Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues
title_full_unstemmed Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues
title_sort Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues
author Reis, João Carlos Gonçalves dos
author_facet Reis, João Carlos Gonçalves dos
Amorim, Marlene Paula Castro
Melão, Nuno Filipe Rosa
author_role author
author2 Amorim, Marlene Paula Castro
Melão, Nuno Filipe Rosa
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, João Carlos Gonçalves dos
Amorim, Marlene Paula Castro
Melão, Nuno Filipe Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Engineering
Systematic literature review
Multi-method approach
Development
Triangulation
Complementarity
Qualitative research
topic Engineering
Systematic literature review
Multi-method approach
Development
Triangulation
Complementarity
Qualitative research
description The purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-19T15:41:18Z
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/17622
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/17622
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reis, J., Amorim, M., & Melão, R. (2017). Breaking Barriers with Qualitative Multi-method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues. Proelium, VII (12), 275-292
1645-8826
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Militar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Militar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130413125337088

Registros relacionados