Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis, João
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Amorim, Marlene, Melão, Nuno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.rcaap.pt/proelium/article/view/11930
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature.
id RCAP_8cc764382e6f792d895c4e1eb652aa37
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/11930
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!ArtigosThe purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature.Academia Militar2017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://revistas.rcaap.pt/proelium/article/view/11930por1645-8826Reis, JoãoAmorim, MarleneMelão, Nunoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-22T10:17:48Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/11930Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:57:07.685869Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!
title Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!
spellingShingle Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!
Reis, João
Artigos
title_short Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!
title_full Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!
title_fullStr Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!
title_full_unstemmed Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!
title_sort Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues!
author Reis, João
author_facet Reis, João
Amorim, Marlene
Melão, Nuno
author_role author
author2 Amorim, Marlene
Melão, Nuno
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, João
Amorim, Marlene
Melão, Nuno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artigos
topic Artigos
description The purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.rcaap.pt/proelium/article/view/11930
url https://revistas.rcaap.pt/proelium/article/view/11930
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1645-8826
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Militar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Militar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130439481294848

Registros relacionados