The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Simão Kick, Paulo Guilherme, Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente, Junior, Galdenoro Botura, Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540
Resumo: Ergonomics is the science responsible for the suitability of the employee´s working conditions and its use can provide better performance, greater comfort and safety in the execution of several tasks. It is an interdisciplinary science, which has connections with Design and can contribute to the development of optimized and functional products that are not harmful to human health. Throughout the development of a product, it is necessary to develop studies and tests that can be perfomed through models, mock-ups and prototypes. These models may be produced with different methods, by handmade techniques or automated and digital processes, such as Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies, for example. This study aimed to compare two mock-ups of vegetables peelers, which were produced in different ways - one produced with epoxy resin (“Durepoxi”), and another by a subtractive RP technology, using the CNC milling machine Roland MDX 540. For comparative purposes, the price, the production time, the quality and surface finishing, dimensional accuracy and ergonomics were considered asvariables. In the end of this study, two distinct models, with advantages and disadvantages in different aspects were obtained, and those production techniques can be combined in order to achieve a more complete and profitable product development process (PDP) as a result.
id RCAP_4795f0c08ff83a4dd75c823b11c9dc57
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machineA Prototipagem Rápida aplicada à avaliação ergonômica: estudo comparativo entre um mock-up produzido manualmente e outro obtido por uma fresadora CNCErgonomics is the science responsible for the suitability of the employee´s working conditions and its use can provide better performance, greater comfort and safety in the execution of several tasks. It is an interdisciplinary science, which has connections with Design and can contribute to the development of optimized and functional products that are not harmful to human health. Throughout the development of a product, it is necessary to develop studies and tests that can be perfomed through models, mock-ups and prototypes. These models may be produced with different methods, by handmade techniques or automated and digital processes, such as Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies, for example. This study aimed to compare two mock-ups of vegetables peelers, which were produced in different ways - one produced with epoxy resin (“Durepoxi”), and another by a subtractive RP technology, using the CNC milling machine Roland MDX 540. For comparative purposes, the price, the production time, the quality and surface finishing, dimensional accuracy and ergonomics were considered asvariables. In the end of this study, two distinct models, with advantages and disadvantages in different aspects were obtained, and those production techniques can be combined in order to achieve a more complete and profitable product development process (PDP) as a result.A Ergonomia é a ciência responsável pela adequação das condições do trabalho ao trabalhador e a sua utilização pode proporcionar melhor desempenho, maior conforto e segurança na execução de diversas tarefas. É uma ciência interdisciplinar, que possui ligações com o Design e pode colaborar na criação de produtos funcionais, otimizados e que não prejudiquem a saúde humana. Para tal, ao longo do desenvolvimento de um produto, é necessária a realização de estudos e testes, que podem ser feitos por meio de modelos, mock-ups e protótipos. Estes podem ser produzidos de diversas maneiras, que podem envolver desde processos manuais até os automatizados e ou digitais, como as tecnologias de Prototipagem Rápida (PR), por exemplo. Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar dois mock-ups de descascadores de alimentos semelhantes, produzidos de formas diferentes - um produzido manualmente a partir de uma resina epóxi (Durepoxi), e outro por meio de uma tecnologia subtrativa de PR, utilizando uma Fresadora CNC Roland MDX 540. Para fins comparativos, foram levadas em consideração as variáveis preço, tempo de produção, qualidade e acabamento superficial, precisão dimensional e Ergonomia do modelo. Como resultado, obteve-se dois modelos distintos, com vantagens e desvantagens em diferentes aspectos, cujas técnicas de produção ao serem conciliadas podem resultar em um processo de desenvolvimento de produto (PDP) ainda mais completo e vantajoso.UA Editora2019-04-01T00:00:00Zjournal articlejournal articlejournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540oai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; No 2 (2017); 8-17Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; Núm. 2 (2017); 8-17Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; n.º 2 (2017); 8-172183-928Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ergotripdesign/article/view/1540https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ergotripdesign/article/view/1540/1270https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGoulart Nishimura, Paula LumiSimão Kick, Paulo GuilhermeRodrigues, Osmar VicenteJunior, Galdenoro BoturaPaschoarelli, Luis Carlos2022-09-22T10:11:27Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:56:47.094630Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
A Prototipagem Rápida aplicada à avaliação ergonômica: estudo comparativo entre um mock-up produzido manualmente e outro obtido por uma fresadora CNC
title The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
spellingShingle The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi
title_short The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
title_full The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
title_fullStr The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
title_full_unstemmed The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
title_sort The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
author Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi
author_facet Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi
Simão Kick, Paulo Guilherme
Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente
Junior, Galdenoro Botura
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
author_role author
author2 Simão Kick, Paulo Guilherme
Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente
Junior, Galdenoro Botura
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi
Simão Kick, Paulo Guilherme
Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente
Junior, Galdenoro Botura
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
description Ergonomics is the science responsible for the suitability of the employee´s working conditions and its use can provide better performance, greater comfort and safety in the execution of several tasks. It is an interdisciplinary science, which has connections with Design and can contribute to the development of optimized and functional products that are not harmful to human health. Throughout the development of a product, it is necessary to develop studies and tests that can be perfomed through models, mock-ups and prototypes. These models may be produced with different methods, by handmade techniques or automated and digital processes, such as Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies, for example. This study aimed to compare two mock-ups of vegetables peelers, which were produced in different ways - one produced with epoxy resin (“Durepoxi”), and another by a subtractive RP technology, using the CNC milling machine Roland MDX 540. For comparative purposes, the price, the production time, the quality and surface finishing, dimensional accuracy and ergonomics were considered asvariables. In the end of this study, two distinct models, with advantages and disadvantages in different aspects were obtained, and those production techniques can be combined in order to achieve a more complete and profitable product development process (PDP) as a result.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
journal article
journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540
url https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540
identifier_str_mv oai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ergotripdesign/article/view/1540
https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ergotripdesign/article/view/1540/1270
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UA Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UA Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; No 2 (2017); 8-17
Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; Núm. 2 (2017); 8-17
Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; n.º 2 (2017); 8-17
2183-928X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130436566253568