The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540 |
Resumo: | Ergonomics is the science responsible for the suitability of the employee´s working conditions and its use can provide better performance, greater comfort and safety in the execution of several tasks. It is an interdisciplinary science, which has connections with Design and can contribute to the development of optimized and functional products that are not harmful to human health. Throughout the development of a product, it is necessary to develop studies and tests that can be perfomed through models, mock-ups and prototypes. These models may be produced with different methods, by handmade techniques or automated and digital processes, such as Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies, for example. This study aimed to compare two mock-ups of vegetables peelers, which were produced in different ways - one produced with epoxy resin (“Durepoxi”), and another by a subtractive RP technology, using the CNC milling machine Roland MDX 540. For comparative purposes, the price, the production time, the quality and surface finishing, dimensional accuracy and ergonomics were considered asvariables. In the end of this study, two distinct models, with advantages and disadvantages in different aspects were obtained, and those production techniques can be combined in order to achieve a more complete and profitable product development process (PDP) as a result. |
id |
RCAP_4795f0c08ff83a4dd75c823b11c9dc57 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machineA Prototipagem Rápida aplicada à avaliação ergonômica: estudo comparativo entre um mock-up produzido manualmente e outro obtido por uma fresadora CNCErgonomics is the science responsible for the suitability of the employee´s working conditions and its use can provide better performance, greater comfort and safety in the execution of several tasks. It is an interdisciplinary science, which has connections with Design and can contribute to the development of optimized and functional products that are not harmful to human health. Throughout the development of a product, it is necessary to develop studies and tests that can be perfomed through models, mock-ups and prototypes. These models may be produced with different methods, by handmade techniques or automated and digital processes, such as Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies, for example. This study aimed to compare two mock-ups of vegetables peelers, which were produced in different ways - one produced with epoxy resin (“Durepoxi”), and another by a subtractive RP technology, using the CNC milling machine Roland MDX 540. For comparative purposes, the price, the production time, the quality and surface finishing, dimensional accuracy and ergonomics were considered asvariables. In the end of this study, two distinct models, with advantages and disadvantages in different aspects were obtained, and those production techniques can be combined in order to achieve a more complete and profitable product development process (PDP) as a result.A Ergonomia é a ciência responsável pela adequação das condições do trabalho ao trabalhador e a sua utilização pode proporcionar melhor desempenho, maior conforto e segurança na execução de diversas tarefas. É uma ciência interdisciplinar, que possui ligações com o Design e pode colaborar na criação de produtos funcionais, otimizados e que não prejudiquem a saúde humana. Para tal, ao longo do desenvolvimento de um produto, é necessária a realização de estudos e testes, que podem ser feitos por meio de modelos, mock-ups e protótipos. Estes podem ser produzidos de diversas maneiras, que podem envolver desde processos manuais até os automatizados e ou digitais, como as tecnologias de Prototipagem Rápida (PR), por exemplo. Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar dois mock-ups de descascadores de alimentos semelhantes, produzidos de formas diferentes - um produzido manualmente a partir de uma resina epóxi (Durepoxi), e outro por meio de uma tecnologia subtrativa de PR, utilizando uma Fresadora CNC Roland MDX 540. Para fins comparativos, foram levadas em consideração as variáveis preço, tempo de produção, qualidade e acabamento superficial, precisão dimensional e Ergonomia do modelo. Como resultado, obteve-se dois modelos distintos, com vantagens e desvantagens em diferentes aspectos, cujas técnicas de produção ao serem conciliadas podem resultar em um processo de desenvolvimento de produto (PDP) ainda mais completo e vantajoso.UA Editora2019-04-01T00:00:00Zjournal articlejournal articlejournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540oai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; No 2 (2017); 8-17Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; Núm. 2 (2017); 8-17Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; n.º 2 (2017); 8-172183-928Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ergotripdesign/article/view/1540https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ergotripdesign/article/view/1540/1270https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGoulart Nishimura, Paula LumiSimão Kick, Paulo GuilhermeRodrigues, Osmar VicenteJunior, Galdenoro BoturaPaschoarelli, Luis Carlos2022-09-22T10:11:27Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:56:47.094630Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine A Prototipagem Rápida aplicada à avaliação ergonômica: estudo comparativo entre um mock-up produzido manualmente e outro obtido por uma fresadora CNC |
title |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine |
spellingShingle |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi |
title_short |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine |
title_full |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine |
title_fullStr |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine |
title_sort |
The Rapid Prototyping applied to ergonomic evaluation: a comparative study between a handmade mock-up and another obtained by CNC milling machine |
author |
Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi |
author_facet |
Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi Simão Kick, Paulo Guilherme Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente Junior, Galdenoro Botura Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Simão Kick, Paulo Guilherme Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente Junior, Galdenoro Botura Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi Simão Kick, Paulo Guilherme Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente Junior, Galdenoro Botura Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos |
description |
Ergonomics is the science responsible for the suitability of the employee´s working conditions and its use can provide better performance, greater comfort and safety in the execution of several tasks. It is an interdisciplinary science, which has connections with Design and can contribute to the development of optimized and functional products that are not harmful to human health. Throughout the development of a product, it is necessary to develop studies and tests that can be perfomed through models, mock-ups and prototypes. These models may be produced with different methods, by handmade techniques or automated and digital processes, such as Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies, for example. This study aimed to compare two mock-ups of vegetables peelers, which were produced in different ways - one produced with epoxy resin (“Durepoxi”), and another by a subtractive RP technology, using the CNC milling machine Roland MDX 540. For comparative purposes, the price, the production time, the quality and surface finishing, dimensional accuracy and ergonomics were considered asvariables. In the end of this study, two distinct models, with advantages and disadvantages in different aspects were obtained, and those production techniques can be combined in order to achieve a more complete and profitable product development process (PDP) as a result. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article journal article journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540 oai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/1540 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ergotripdesign/article/view/1540 https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i2.1540 https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/ergotripdesign/article/view/1540/1270 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UA Editora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UA Editora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; No 2 (2017); 8-17 Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; Núm. 2 (2017); 8-17 Revista dos encontros internacionais Ergotrip Design; n.º 2 (2017); 8-17 2183-928X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130436566253568 |