Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nunes, Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Ayala, Mariano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/2690
Resumo: Good communication between a parent and pediatrician may increase therapeutic adherence and the parent’s satisfaction. That is why the pediatrician’s main activity in a consultation is getting and giving information. Objective: To analyze what occurs during the pediatrician visits of the well-child program, namely the communication techniques used by the pediatricians. Methodology: We have analyzed 49 visits to five pediatricians in Seville (Spain). In order to study these visits we audio-taped them and transcribed the tapes. In order to quantify the communication techniques used by the pediatricians we developed a check list with 27 categories divided into three main communication tasks in a primary care visit: “concrete data gathering,” “narrative support” and “information & counseling.” Results: We have identified 2025 instances by which pediatricians used a communication technique, 1201 (59%) instances by which pediatrician used a communication technique to get information and 824 (41%) instances by which they gave information and counseling. Pediatricians used a limited range of techniques to inform and counsel and to give narrative support. Significant differences between pediatricians were observed in the use of most techniques. Conclusion: A limited range of communication techniques was observed. The lack of homogeneity between pediatricians suggested different styles of communication, depending on the quantity and quality of communication techniques. Practice implications: This result can be regarded as a useful hypothesis, and should be confirmed with larger pediatrician samples, because it would help to understand consultation practices better and this in time may help improve communication with parents.
id RCAP_490bb499eeafe4bf0c5ef70302f5ae1f
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/2690
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot studyCommunication techniquesPediatriciansParentsWell-child programGood communication between a parent and pediatrician may increase therapeutic adherence and the parent’s satisfaction. That is why the pediatrician’s main activity in a consultation is getting and giving information. Objective: To analyze what occurs during the pediatrician visits of the well-child program, namely the communication techniques used by the pediatricians. Methodology: We have analyzed 49 visits to five pediatricians in Seville (Spain). In order to study these visits we audio-taped them and transcribed the tapes. In order to quantify the communication techniques used by the pediatricians we developed a check list with 27 categories divided into three main communication tasks in a primary care visit: “concrete data gathering,” “narrative support” and “information & counseling.” Results: We have identified 2025 instances by which pediatricians used a communication technique, 1201 (59%) instances by which pediatrician used a communication technique to get information and 824 (41%) instances by which they gave information and counseling. Pediatricians used a limited range of techniques to inform and counsel and to give narrative support. Significant differences between pediatricians were observed in the use of most techniques. Conclusion: A limited range of communication techniques was observed. The lack of homogeneity between pediatricians suggested different styles of communication, depending on the quantity and quality of communication techniques. Practice implications: This result can be regarded as a useful hypothesis, and should be confirmed with larger pediatrician samples, because it would help to understand consultation practices better and this in time may help improve communication with parents.ElsevierSapientiaNunes, CristinaAyala, Mariano2013-05-16T09:53:14Z20102010-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/2690engAUT: CSN01553;info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:13:05Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/2690Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:56:00.642368Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study
title Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study
spellingShingle Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study
Nunes, Cristina
Communication techniques
Pediatricians
Parents
Well-child program
title_short Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study
title_full Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study
title_fullStr Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study
title_sort Communication techniques used by pediatricians in the well-child program visits: a pilot study
author Nunes, Cristina
author_facet Nunes, Cristina
Ayala, Mariano
author_role author
author2 Ayala, Mariano
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes, Cristina
Ayala, Mariano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Communication techniques
Pediatricians
Parents
Well-child program
topic Communication techniques
Pediatricians
Parents
Well-child program
description Good communication between a parent and pediatrician may increase therapeutic adherence and the parent’s satisfaction. That is why the pediatrician’s main activity in a consultation is getting and giving information. Objective: To analyze what occurs during the pediatrician visits of the well-child program, namely the communication techniques used by the pediatricians. Methodology: We have analyzed 49 visits to five pediatricians in Seville (Spain). In order to study these visits we audio-taped them and transcribed the tapes. In order to quantify the communication techniques used by the pediatricians we developed a check list with 27 categories divided into three main communication tasks in a primary care visit: “concrete data gathering,” “narrative support” and “information & counseling.” Results: We have identified 2025 instances by which pediatricians used a communication technique, 1201 (59%) instances by which pediatrician used a communication technique to get information and 824 (41%) instances by which they gave information and counseling. Pediatricians used a limited range of techniques to inform and counsel and to give narrative support. Significant differences between pediatricians were observed in the use of most techniques. Conclusion: A limited range of communication techniques was observed. The lack of homogeneity between pediatricians suggested different styles of communication, depending on the quantity and quality of communication techniques. Practice implications: This result can be regarded as a useful hypothesis, and should be confirmed with larger pediatrician samples, because it would help to understand consultation practices better and this in time may help improve communication with parents.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z
2013-05-16T09:53:14Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/2690
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/2690
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv AUT: CSN01553;
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133164828884992