Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Casanova, Sara
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vasconcelos, Joana, Miranda, Ana Cláudia, Mansinho, Kamal, Fernandes, Cândida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.79.2.1375
Resumo: The infectious risk associated with biological therapy is well studied today and screening and prophylaxis strategies have been stablished. However, this may not be true for systemic steroids or DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) such as methotrexate and cyclosporine, even after long term use. The dose and duration of therapy with systemic steroids are related to the occurrence of opportunistic infection. Doses above 5 mg/day are associated with bacterial infection, above 10 mg/day with herpes zoster virus (HZV) reactivation, and above 15 mg/day or for more than 2 to 4 weeks with tuberculosis reactivation, which implies proper screening and chemoprophylaxis. Systemic steroids also appear as one of the main risk factors for the development of pneumocystosis in non-HIV patients and prolonged doses, for more than 4 weeks, can lead to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection reactivation, and justify the beginning of prophylaxis with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir. Cases of strongyloidiasis with hyperinfection syndrome have also been reported in patients on steroids. The degree of immunosuppression conferred may contraindicate live attenuated vaccines. Methotrexate and cyclosporine have a low infectious risk when used as monotherapy. Symptom surveillance is the main preventive strategy. However, both are immunomodulators, contraindicate live attenuated vaccines administration and are associated with infectious risk. Cyclosporine can lead to bacterial infection and HZV reactivation, and methotrexate is associated with HZV and HBV reactivation, especially if administered at a dose >0.4 mg/kg/week. Both are linked with active tuberculosis when in therapeutic combination with other immunosuppressants. Understanding and studying the risk of infection when using immunosuppressive therapy allows its use in a more informed and safe manner.
id RCAP_4c13ea5a75c562c98ec9014cc1ff7f00
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1375
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to PreventInfeções Associadas a Terapêuticas Sistémicas Não Biológicas em Dermatologia: Como Prevenir?CyclosporineImmunosuppressive AgentsMethotrexate, Opportunistic InfectionsSteroidsImunossupressoresInfecções OportunistasMetotrexatoCiclosporinaEsteroidesThe infectious risk associated with biological therapy is well studied today and screening and prophylaxis strategies have been stablished. However, this may not be true for systemic steroids or DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) such as methotrexate and cyclosporine, even after long term use. The dose and duration of therapy with systemic steroids are related to the occurrence of opportunistic infection. Doses above 5 mg/day are associated with bacterial infection, above 10 mg/day with herpes zoster virus (HZV) reactivation, and above 15 mg/day or for more than 2 to 4 weeks with tuberculosis reactivation, which implies proper screening and chemoprophylaxis. Systemic steroids also appear as one of the main risk factors for the development of pneumocystosis in non-HIV patients and prolonged doses, for more than 4 weeks, can lead to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection reactivation, and justify the beginning of prophylaxis with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir. Cases of strongyloidiasis with hyperinfection syndrome have also been reported in patients on steroids. The degree of immunosuppression conferred may contraindicate live attenuated vaccines. Methotrexate and cyclosporine have a low infectious risk when used as monotherapy. Symptom surveillance is the main preventive strategy. However, both are immunomodulators, contraindicate live attenuated vaccines administration and are associated with infectious risk. Cyclosporine can lead to bacterial infection and HZV reactivation, and methotrexate is associated with HZV and HBV reactivation, especially if administered at a dose >0.4 mg/kg/week. Both are linked with active tuberculosis when in therapeutic combination with other immunosuppressants. Understanding and studying the risk of infection when using immunosuppressive therapy allows its use in a more informed and safe manner.O risco infecioso associado a terapêutica biológica é cada vez mais estudado e conhecido, existindo estratégias de rastreio e profilaxia bem estabelecidas. O mesmo não se verifica na utilização de corticoide sistémico nem dos tradicionais modificadores de doença autoimune, de que são exemplo o metotrexato e a ciclosporina, apesar de usados há largos anos. A dose e tempo de terapêutica com corticoide sistémico relacionam-se com a ocorrência de infeção oportunista. Doses superiores a 5 mg/dia associam-se a infeção bacteriana, superiores a 10 mg/dia a reativação de infeção por vírus herpes zoster (VHZ), e superiores a 15 mg/dia ou por mais de 2 a 4 semanas a reativação de tuberculose latente, o que implica rastreio e aplicação de quimioprofilaxia de forma adequada. O corticoide sistémico surge ainda como dos principais fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento de pneumocistose no doente não-VIH e doses prolongadas (por mais de 4 semanas) podem levar a reativação de infeção por vírus da hepatite B (VHB) e justificar a profilaxia com tenofovir disoproxil fumarato ou entecavir. Foram ainda descritos casos de estrongiloidíase complicada de síndrome de hiperinfeção em doentes sob corticoide. O grau de imunossupressão conferido pode contraindicar a realização de vacinas vivas atenuadas. O metotrexato e ciclosporina comportam baixo risco infecioso quando utilizados em monoterapia, sendo a vigilância de sintomas a principal estratégia preventiva. Não obstante, ambos são imunomoduladores, contraindicam a realização de vacinas vivas atenuadas e associam-se a risco de infeção bacteriana e reativação de infeção por VHZ, no caso da ciclosporina, ou reativação de infeção por VHZ e VHB no caso do metotrexato, sobretudo se administrado em dose >0,4 mg/kg/semana. Ambos se associam a evolução para tuberculose ativa quando em associação terapêutica com outros imunossupressores. Compreender e estudar o risco de infeção na utilização de terapêutica imunossupressora permite a sua aplicação de forma mais informada e segura.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2021-06-26T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.79.2.1375oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1375Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 79 No 2 (2021): April - June; 121-128Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 79 n. 2 (2021): Abril - Junho; 121-1282182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1375https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.79.2.1375https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1375/899Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereologyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCasanova, SaraVasconcelos, JoanaMiranda, Ana CláudiaMansinho, KamalFernandes, Cândida2022-10-06T12:35:19Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1375Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:20.716054Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent
Infeções Associadas a Terapêuticas Sistémicas Não Biológicas em Dermatologia: Como Prevenir?
title Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent
spellingShingle Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent
Casanova, Sara
Cyclosporine
Immunosuppressive Agents
Methotrexate, Opportunistic Infections
Steroids
Imunossupressores
Infecções Oportunistas
Metotrexato
Ciclosporina
Esteroides
title_short Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent
title_full Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent
title_fullStr Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent
title_full_unstemmed Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent
title_sort Non-Biologic Systemic Therapies Associated Infections in Dermatology: How to Prevent
author Casanova, Sara
author_facet Casanova, Sara
Vasconcelos, Joana
Miranda, Ana Cláudia
Mansinho, Kamal
Fernandes, Cândida
author_role author
author2 Vasconcelos, Joana
Miranda, Ana Cláudia
Mansinho, Kamal
Fernandes, Cândida
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Casanova, Sara
Vasconcelos, Joana
Miranda, Ana Cláudia
Mansinho, Kamal
Fernandes, Cândida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cyclosporine
Immunosuppressive Agents
Methotrexate, Opportunistic Infections
Steroids
Imunossupressores
Infecções Oportunistas
Metotrexato
Ciclosporina
Esteroides
topic Cyclosporine
Immunosuppressive Agents
Methotrexate, Opportunistic Infections
Steroids
Imunossupressores
Infecções Oportunistas
Metotrexato
Ciclosporina
Esteroides
description The infectious risk associated with biological therapy is well studied today and screening and prophylaxis strategies have been stablished. However, this may not be true for systemic steroids or DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) such as methotrexate and cyclosporine, even after long term use. The dose and duration of therapy with systemic steroids are related to the occurrence of opportunistic infection. Doses above 5 mg/day are associated with bacterial infection, above 10 mg/day with herpes zoster virus (HZV) reactivation, and above 15 mg/day or for more than 2 to 4 weeks with tuberculosis reactivation, which implies proper screening and chemoprophylaxis. Systemic steroids also appear as one of the main risk factors for the development of pneumocystosis in non-HIV patients and prolonged doses, for more than 4 weeks, can lead to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection reactivation, and justify the beginning of prophylaxis with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir. Cases of strongyloidiasis with hyperinfection syndrome have also been reported in patients on steroids. The degree of immunosuppression conferred may contraindicate live attenuated vaccines. Methotrexate and cyclosporine have a low infectious risk when used as monotherapy. Symptom surveillance is the main preventive strategy. However, both are immunomodulators, contraindicate live attenuated vaccines administration and are associated with infectious risk. Cyclosporine can lead to bacterial infection and HZV reactivation, and methotrexate is associated with HZV and HBV reactivation, especially if administered at a dose >0.4 mg/kg/week. Both are linked with active tuberculosis when in therapeutic combination with other immunosuppressants. Understanding and studying the risk of infection when using immunosuppressive therapy allows its use in a more informed and safe manner.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-26T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.79.2.1375
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1375
url https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.79.2.1375
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1375
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1375
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.79.2.1375
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1375/899
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 79 No 2 (2021): April - June; 121-128
Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 79 n. 2 (2021): Abril - Junho; 121-128
2182-2409
2182-2395
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130568611332096