A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Manassero-Mas, María-Antonia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v11i2.5914
Resumo: The specialists and researchers in science education agree that nature of science (NoS) is a constituent and relevant component of scientific (and technological) literacy that all citizens must acquire from basic education. This meritorious agreement contrasts with the multiple controversies existing about this issue, from its name to the didactic designs that more genuinely represent these contents in the educational curricula, which affects the research and the educational aspects. In recent years, controversy has centered on the so-called “consensus view”, which is considered a reductionism of the NoS meaning by critics, who propose broader conceptualizations. This study presents a new conceptualization of NoS, which assumes criticisms on the consensus view, and starts from Popper’s three-world model of science. The interactions and relationships between the three worlds, in a natural way, generate and justify a set of interdisciplinary meta-knowledge that give rise the NoS, where technology is explicitly included, so that the concept of science is extended to the techno-science and, therefore, the NoS is also re-conceptualized as the Nature of Science and Technology (NoS&T). This framework allows to elaborate a holistic scheme of four basic aspects, where multiple specific topics and sub-topics are organized in a functional, flexible and open taxonomy that gives structure to the conceptualization of NoS&T and that encompasses previous conceptualizations.
id RCAP_4dc2178cead4dc80b09cc53627b45463
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/5914
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)Un modelo conceptual y taxonómico para estructurar el campo ciencia-tecnología-sociedad (o naturaleza de la ciencia y tecnología, o como se llame)The specialists and researchers in science education agree that nature of science (NoS) is a constituent and relevant component of scientific (and technological) literacy that all citizens must acquire from basic education. This meritorious agreement contrasts with the multiple controversies existing about this issue, from its name to the didactic designs that more genuinely represent these contents in the educational curricula, which affects the research and the educational aspects. In recent years, controversy has centered on the so-called “consensus view”, which is considered a reductionism of the NoS meaning by critics, who propose broader conceptualizations. This study presents a new conceptualization of NoS, which assumes criticisms on the consensus view, and starts from Popper’s three-world model of science. The interactions and relationships between the three worlds, in a natural way, generate and justify a set of interdisciplinary meta-knowledge that give rise the NoS, where technology is explicitly included, so that the concept of science is extended to the techno-science and, therefore, the NoS is also re-conceptualized as the Nature of Science and Technology (NoS&T). This framework allows to elaborate a holistic scheme of four basic aspects, where multiple specific topics and sub-topics are organized in a functional, flexible and open taxonomy that gives structure to the conceptualization of NoS&T and that encompasses previous conceptualizations.Los especialistas e investigadores en didáctica de la ciencia coinciden en que la naturaleza de la ciencia (NdC) es un componente constitutivo y relevante de la alfabetización científica (y tecnológica) que deben adquirir todos los ciudadanos desde la educación básica. Este meritorio acuerdo contrasta con las múltiples controversias existentes acerca de esta cuestión, desde su denominación hasta los diseños didácticos que representen más genuinamente estos contenidos en los currículos educativos, y que afecta a los aspectos de investigación y educativos. En los últimos años la controversia se ha centrado entre la denominada “visión de consenso”, considerada un reduccionismo del significado de NdC por los críticos, quienes proponen conceptualizaciones más amplias. Este estudio presenta una nueva conceptualización de NdC, que asume las críticas a la visión de consenso, y parte del modelo de tres mundos sobre la ciencia de Popper. Las interacciones y las relaciones entre los tres mundos, de una manera natural, generan y justifican un conjunto de meta-conocimientos interdisciplinarios que conforman la NdC, en los cuales se incluye explícitamente la tecnología, de modo que se amplía el concepto de ciencia hasta la tecno-ciencia y, por lo tanto, también se re-conceptualiza la NdC como la Naturaleza de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (NdC&T). Este marco permite elaborar un esquema holístico de cuatro aspectos básicos, donde múltiples temas específicos y subtemas se organizan en una taxonomía funcional, flexible y abierta que da estructura a la conceptualización de NdC&T y que engloba a las conceptualizaciones anteriores.Os especialistas e pesquisadores em didática da ciência concordam que a natureza da ciência (NdC) é um componente constituinte e relevante da alfabetização científica (e tecnológica) que todos os cidadãos devem adquirir da educação básica. Esse meritório acordo contrasta com as múltiplas controvérsias existentes sobre essa questão, desde sua denominação até os desenhos didáticos que representam mais genuinamente esses conteúdos nos currículos educacionais e que afetam os aspectos da pesquisa e educacionais. Nos últimos anos, a controvérsia centrou-se na chamada “visão de consenso”, considerada um reducionismo do significado da NdC pelos críticos, que propõem conceituações mais amplas. Este estudo apresenta uma nova conceituação do NdC, que assume as críticas à visão de consenso, e parte do modelo de três mundos da ciência de Popper. As interações e relações entre os três mundos, de uma forma natural, geram e justificam um conjunto de meta-conhecimentos interdisciplinares que formam a NdC, em que inclui explicitamente a tecnologia, de modo que o conceito de ciência é estendido para a tecno-ciência e, portanto, a NdC também é re-conceituada como a Natureza da Ciência e Tecnologia (NdC&T). Este quadro permite desenvolver um esquema holístico de quatro aspectos básicos onde vários temas e subtemas específicos são dispostos em uma taxonomia funcional, flexível e aberta que dá estrutura à conceituação do NDC & T e inclui as concepções anteriores.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2019-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v11i2.5914https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v11i2.5914Indagatio Didactica; Vol 11 No 2 (2019); 121-140Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2019); 121-140Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 11 No 2 (2019); 121-140Indagatio Didactica; vol. 11 n.º 2 (2019); 121-1401647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPspahttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/5914https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/5914/4357Vázquez-Alonso, ÁngelManassero-Mas, María-Antoniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-22T10:17:27Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/5914Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:16.607171Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)
Un modelo conceptual y taxonómico para estructurar el campo ciencia-tecnología-sociedad (o naturaleza de la ciencia y tecnología, o como se llame)
title A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)
spellingShingle A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)
Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
title_short A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)
title_full A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)
title_fullStr A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)
title_full_unstemmed A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)
title_sort A conceptual and taxonomic model to structure the field science-technology-society (or nature of science and technology, or whatever it is called)
author Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
author_facet Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
Manassero-Mas, María-Antonia
author_role author
author2 Manassero-Mas, María-Antonia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
Manassero-Mas, María-Antonia
description The specialists and researchers in science education agree that nature of science (NoS) is a constituent and relevant component of scientific (and technological) literacy that all citizens must acquire from basic education. This meritorious agreement contrasts with the multiple controversies existing about this issue, from its name to the didactic designs that more genuinely represent these contents in the educational curricula, which affects the research and the educational aspects. In recent years, controversy has centered on the so-called “consensus view”, which is considered a reductionism of the NoS meaning by critics, who propose broader conceptualizations. This study presents a new conceptualization of NoS, which assumes criticisms on the consensus view, and starts from Popper’s three-world model of science. The interactions and relationships between the three worlds, in a natural way, generate and justify a set of interdisciplinary meta-knowledge that give rise the NoS, where technology is explicitly included, so that the concept of science is extended to the techno-science and, therefore, the NoS is also re-conceptualized as the Nature of Science and Technology (NoS&T). This framework allows to elaborate a holistic scheme of four basic aspects, where multiple specific topics and sub-topics are organized in a functional, flexible and open taxonomy that gives structure to the conceptualization of NoS&T and that encompasses previous conceptualizations.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v11i2.5914
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v11i2.5914
url https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v11i2.5914
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/5914
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/5914/4357
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Indagatio Didactica; Vol 11 No 2 (2019); 121-140
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2019); 121-140
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 11 No 2 (2019); 121-140
Indagatio Didactica; vol. 11 n.º 2 (2019); 121-140
1647-3582
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133570699100160