Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/328 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy is considered a standard approach for TNM stage II-III rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and toxicity of pre-operative chemoradiation in this setting. Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2011, patients received 5 weeks of treatment with radiotherapy 50.4/54 Gy/25 or 30 fractions with concurrent capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily 5 days per week (CAP) or radiotherapy 50.4/54 Gy/25 fractions with capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily 5 days per week and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) once weekly (CAPOX). Histopathologic tumor regression (TRG) was determined by the amount of viable tumor versus fibrosis. Toxicity was monitored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute.Results: Seventy six patients were included (median age 68.3 years [range 45-88], 67% male). Median tumor distance from anal verge was 7cm (range 2-13). CAP treatment was performed in 67% and CAPOX in 33% of patients. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 13,2%. T- and N- downstaging rates were 52.6%, 65.8%, respectively. Grade 3 toxicity was documented in less than 10% of patients and no grade 4 toxicity was observed.Conclusions: This study suggests that there is no major benefit from adding oxaliplatin to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine.Keywords: rectal cancer, chemoradiotherapy, downstaging, capecitabine, oxaliplatin |
id |
RCAP_4ec990671bdfb64c985531a71b53cdb7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revista.spcir.com:article/328 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus CapoxTratamento pré-operatório do carcinoma do recto localmente avançado: Capecitabina versus CapoxIntroduction: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy is considered a standard approach for TNM stage II-III rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and toxicity of pre-operative chemoradiation in this setting. Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2011, patients received 5 weeks of treatment with radiotherapy 50.4/54 Gy/25 or 30 fractions with concurrent capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily 5 days per week (CAP) or radiotherapy 50.4/54 Gy/25 fractions with capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily 5 days per week and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) once weekly (CAPOX). Histopathologic tumor regression (TRG) was determined by the amount of viable tumor versus fibrosis. Toxicity was monitored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute.Results: Seventy six patients were included (median age 68.3 years [range 45-88], 67% male). Median tumor distance from anal verge was 7cm (range 2-13). CAP treatment was performed in 67% and CAPOX in 33% of patients. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 13,2%. T- and N- downstaging rates were 52.6%, 65.8%, respectively. Grade 3 toxicity was documented in less than 10% of patients and no grade 4 toxicity was observed.Conclusions: This study suggests that there is no major benefit from adding oxaliplatin to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine.Keywords: rectal cancer, chemoradiotherapy, downstaging, capecitabine, oxaliplatin Introdução: A terapêutica pré-operatória com quimioterapia e radioterapia concomitante (QRT-PO) é o tratamento de primeira-linha no carcinoma do recto localmente avançado, estadios II e III (classificação TNM). O objectivo deste estudo é o de comparar a eficácia e perfil de segurança e toxicidade de dois esquemas alternativos de quimioterapia em combinação com radioterapia: capecitabina versus capecitabina em associação com oxaliplatina. Métodos: Entre Janeiro 2007 e Janeiro 2011, foram estudados retrospectivamente setenta e seis doentes com 68,3 anos de idade mediana (limites, 45-88 anos), 68% do sexo masculino, com o diagnóstico de carcinoma do recto nos estadios II e III, com uma distância mediana à margem anal de 7 cm (3-12cm), submetidos a QRT-PO. Foram administrados dois esquemas de QRT-PO: radioterapia 50,4 Gy dose total concomitante com a capecitabina 825 mg/m2 bi-diário, dia 1-38 (esquema CAP), versus radioterapia 50,4 Gy dose total concomitante com capecitabina 825 mg/m2 bi-diário, dia 1-38 e oxaliplatina 50 mg/m2 semanal (esquema CAPOX). O grau de regressão histológica (GRH) foi determinado pela quantidade de tumor viável versus fibrose. A toxicidade foi monitorizada de acordo com os critérios de toxicidade do National Cancer Institute. Resultados: O esquema CAP foi aplicado em 67% e o esquema CAPOX em 33% dos doentes. O total de respostas completas (pRC) foi de 13,2% (GRH 4). Na avaliação histopatológica, a caracterização ypTNM documentou um downstaging de T e N em 52.6% e 65.8% dos casos, respectivamente. A toxicidade grau 3 foi reportada em menos de 10% dos casos e não foi observada toxicidade grau 4. Conclusão: Este estudo sugere não haver benefício da adição da oxaliplatina ao esquema pré-operatório com RT e capecitabina. Palavras-chave: carcinoma recto, neo-adjuvante, downstaging, capecitabina, oxaliplatina. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2014-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/328Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 27 (2013): Dezembro 2013 - II Série; 11-18Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 27 (2013): Dezembro 2013 - II Série; 11-182183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/328https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/328/321Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarata, Pedro C.Oliveira, Sónia D.Mascarenhas, Luis L.Almeida, CarlosBatarda, Lurdes V.2024-03-14T22:04:43Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/328Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T04:00:42.221929Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox Tratamento pré-operatório do carcinoma do recto localmente avançado: Capecitabina versus Capox |
title |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox |
spellingShingle |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox Barata, Pedro C. |
title_short |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox |
title_full |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox |
title_fullStr |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox |
title_sort |
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Capecitabine versus Capox |
author |
Barata, Pedro C. |
author_facet |
Barata, Pedro C. Oliveira, Sónia D. Mascarenhas, Luis L. Almeida, Carlos Batarda, Lurdes V. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Sónia D. Mascarenhas, Luis L. Almeida, Carlos Batarda, Lurdes V. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barata, Pedro C. Oliveira, Sónia D. Mascarenhas, Luis L. Almeida, Carlos Batarda, Lurdes V. |
description |
Introduction: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy is considered a standard approach for TNM stage II-III rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and toxicity of pre-operative chemoradiation in this setting. Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2011, patients received 5 weeks of treatment with radiotherapy 50.4/54 Gy/25 or 30 fractions with concurrent capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily 5 days per week (CAP) or radiotherapy 50.4/54 Gy/25 fractions with capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily 5 days per week and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) once weekly (CAPOX). Histopathologic tumor regression (TRG) was determined by the amount of viable tumor versus fibrosis. Toxicity was monitored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute.Results: Seventy six patients were included (median age 68.3 years [range 45-88], 67% male). Median tumor distance from anal verge was 7cm (range 2-13). CAP treatment was performed in 67% and CAPOX in 33% of patients. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 13,2%. T- and N- downstaging rates were 52.6%, 65.8%, respectively. Grade 3 toxicity was documented in less than 10% of patients and no grade 4 toxicity was observed.Conclusions: This study suggests that there is no major benefit from adding oxaliplatin to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine.Keywords: rectal cancer, chemoradiotherapy, downstaging, capecitabine, oxaliplatin |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/328 |
url |
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/328 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/328 https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/328/321 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 27 (2013): Dezembro 2013 - II Série; 11-18 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 27 (2013): Dezembro 2013 - II Série; 11-18 2183-1165 1646-6918 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138182010241024 |