Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120607 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: Pathological complete response has shown a better prognosis for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. However, correlations between post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors and pathologic complete response are not well confirmed. The aim of the current study was to identify post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors that could serve as indicators of pathologic complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 544 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from December 2003 to June 2014. All patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors that are significant indicators of pathologic complete response. RESULTS: In this study, 126 of 544 patients (23.2%) achieved pathological complete response. In multivariate analyses, increased pathological complete response rate was significantly associated with the following factors: post-chemoradiotherapy clinical T stage 0-2 (odds ratio=2.098, 95% confidence interval=1.023-4.304, p=0.043), post-chemoradiotherapy clinical N stage 0 (odds ratio=2.011, 95% confidence interval=1.264-3.201, p=0.003), interval from completion of preoperative chemoradiotherapy to surgery of >;7 weeks (odds ratio=1.795, 95% confidence interval=1.151-2.801, p=0.010) and post-chemoradiotherapy carcinoembryonic antigen ≤2 ng/ml (odds ratio=1.579, 95% confidence interval=1.026-2.432, p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Post-chemoradiotherapy clinical T stage 0-2, post-chemoradiotherapy clinical N stage 0, interval from completion of chemoradiotherapy to surgery of >;7 weeks and post-chemoradiotherapy carcinoembryonic antigen ≤2 ng/ml were independent clinical indicators for pathological complete response. These findings demonstrate that post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors could be valuable for post-operative assessment of pathological complete response. |
id |
USP-19_77f39c872d3b3265cb921a4cadb5c61f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/120607 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer OBJECTIVES: Pathological complete response has shown a better prognosis for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. However, correlations between post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors and pathologic complete response are not well confirmed. The aim of the current study was to identify post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors that could serve as indicators of pathologic complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 544 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from December 2003 to June 2014. All patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors that are significant indicators of pathologic complete response. RESULTS: In this study, 126 of 544 patients (23.2%) achieved pathological complete response. In multivariate analyses, increased pathological complete response rate was significantly associated with the following factors: post-chemoradiotherapy clinical T stage 0-2 (odds ratio=2.098, 95% confidence interval=1.023-4.304, p=0.043), post-chemoradiotherapy clinical N stage 0 (odds ratio=2.011, 95% confidence interval=1.264-3.201, p=0.003), interval from completion of preoperative chemoradiotherapy to surgery of >;7 weeks (odds ratio=1.795, 95% confidence interval=1.151-2.801, p=0.010) and post-chemoradiotherapy carcinoembryonic antigen ≤2 ng/ml (odds ratio=1.579, 95% confidence interval=1.026-2.432, p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Post-chemoradiotherapy clinical T stage 0-2, post-chemoradiotherapy clinical N stage 0, interval from completion of chemoradiotherapy to surgery of >;7 weeks and post-chemoradiotherapy carcinoembryonic antigen ≤2 ng/ml were independent clinical indicators for pathological complete response. These findings demonstrate that post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors could be valuable for post-operative assessment of pathological complete response. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/12060710.6061/clinics/2016(08)07Clinics; Vol. 71 No. 8 (2016); 449-454Clinics; v. 71 n. 8 (2016); 449-454Clinics; Vol. 71 Núm. 8 (2016); 449-4541980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120607/117680Copyright (c) 2016 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeng, JianhongLin, JunzhongQiu, MiaozhenWu, XiaojunLu, ZhenhaiChen, GongLi, LirenDing, PeirongGao, YuanhongZeng, ZhifanZhang, HuizhongWan, DesenPan, Zhizhong2016-09-12T18:51:49Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/120607Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2016-09-12T18:51:49Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer |
title |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer |
spellingShingle |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer Peng, Jianhong |
title_short |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer |
title_full |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer |
title_fullStr |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer |
title_sort |
Clinical factors of post-chemoradiotherapy as valuable indicators for pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer |
author |
Peng, Jianhong |
author_facet |
Peng, Jianhong Lin, Junzhong Qiu, Miaozhen Wu, Xiaojun Lu, Zhenhai Chen, Gong Li, Liren Ding, Peirong Gao, Yuanhong Zeng, Zhifan Zhang, Huizhong Wan, Desen Pan, Zhizhong |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lin, Junzhong Qiu, Miaozhen Wu, Xiaojun Lu, Zhenhai Chen, Gong Li, Liren Ding, Peirong Gao, Yuanhong Zeng, Zhifan Zhang, Huizhong Wan, Desen Pan, Zhizhong |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peng, Jianhong Lin, Junzhong Qiu, Miaozhen Wu, Xiaojun Lu, Zhenhai Chen, Gong Li, Liren Ding, Peirong Gao, Yuanhong Zeng, Zhifan Zhang, Huizhong Wan, Desen Pan, Zhizhong |
description |
OBJECTIVES: Pathological complete response has shown a better prognosis for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. However, correlations between post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors and pathologic complete response are not well confirmed. The aim of the current study was to identify post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors that could serve as indicators of pathologic complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 544 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from December 2003 to June 2014. All patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors that are significant indicators of pathologic complete response. RESULTS: In this study, 126 of 544 patients (23.2%) achieved pathological complete response. In multivariate analyses, increased pathological complete response rate was significantly associated with the following factors: post-chemoradiotherapy clinical T stage 0-2 (odds ratio=2.098, 95% confidence interval=1.023-4.304, p=0.043), post-chemoradiotherapy clinical N stage 0 (odds ratio=2.011, 95% confidence interval=1.264-3.201, p=0.003), interval from completion of preoperative chemoradiotherapy to surgery of >;7 weeks (odds ratio=1.795, 95% confidence interval=1.151-2.801, p=0.010) and post-chemoradiotherapy carcinoembryonic antigen ≤2 ng/ml (odds ratio=1.579, 95% confidence interval=1.026-2.432, p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Post-chemoradiotherapy clinical T stage 0-2, post-chemoradiotherapy clinical N stage 0, interval from completion of chemoradiotherapy to surgery of >;7 weeks and post-chemoradiotherapy carcinoembryonic antigen ≤2 ng/ml were independent clinical indicators for pathological complete response. These findings demonstrate that post-chemoradiotherapy clinical factors could be valuable for post-operative assessment of pathological complete response. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120607 10.6061/clinics/2016(08)07 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120607 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2016(08)07 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120607/117680 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 71 No. 8 (2016); 449-454 Clinics; v. 71 n. 8 (2016); 449-454 Clinics; Vol. 71 Núm. 8 (2016); 449-454 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222762665508864 |