Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/46835 |
Resumo: | Background. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method, individual work method, and work method per reference nurse). As for the impact of the work method on clients, we highlight the interference in the quality of care provided and, regarding nurses, the impact on workload and job satisfaction. Therefore, the existence of tools that allow identifying the organizational methodologies of nursing care is relevant. Aim. The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the nurses assessment scale (NWMAS). Methods. The methodological study followed the recommendations of the EQUATOR network. The NWMAS was previously developed as a self-completion questionnaire. To determine construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. 325 participants were enrolled in this study. In exploratory factor analysis, the 25 items comprising NWMAS were distributed in five dimensions, contemplating the work methods. Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale was 0.846. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit. Conclusion. The NWMAS is a valid and reliable tool. Implications for Nursing Practice. The NWMAS identifies the work methods adopted by nurses in hospital settings, is a valuable tool for nursing management, and contributes to the definition of strategies that promote the quality of nursing care and the safety of patients |
id |
RCAP_50a20818be48a45891e7c4ab57a28a7f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/46835 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct ValidationNursing work methodWork methodsNursesBackground. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method, individual work method, and work method per reference nurse). As for the impact of the work method on clients, we highlight the interference in the quality of care provided and, regarding nurses, the impact on workload and job satisfaction. Therefore, the existence of tools that allow identifying the organizational methodologies of nursing care is relevant. Aim. The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the nurses assessment scale (NWMAS). Methods. The methodological study followed the recommendations of the EQUATOR network. The NWMAS was previously developed as a self-completion questionnaire. To determine construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. 325 participants were enrolled in this study. In exploratory factor analysis, the 25 items comprising NWMAS were distributed in five dimensions, contemplating the work methods. Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale was 0.846. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit. Conclusion. The NWMAS is a valid and reliable tool. Implications for Nursing Practice. The NWMAS identifies the work methods adopted by nurses in hospital settings, is a valuable tool for nursing management, and contributes to the definition of strategies that promote the quality of nursing care and the safety of patientsHindawi and WileyRepositório ComumVentura-Silva, J. M.Martins, MMTrindade, L. L.Faria, A. C.Barros, S. C.Melo, R. M.Oliveira, I. J.Castro, S. F.Ribeiro, Olga2023-09-28T11:50:57Z20232023-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/46835engVentura-Silva, J. M., Martins, M. M., Trindade, L. L., Faria, A. C., Barros, S. C., Melo, R. M., Oliveira, I. J., Castro, S. F., & Ribeiro, O. M. (2023). Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation. Nursing Forum, 2023, 8884183. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/888418310.1155/2023/88841831744-6198info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-05T09:09:20Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/46835Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:33:24.172883Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation |
title |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation |
spellingShingle |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation Ventura-Silva, J. M. Nursing work method Work methods Nurses |
title_short |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation |
title_full |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation |
title_fullStr |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation |
title_sort |
Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation |
author |
Ventura-Silva, J. M. |
author_facet |
Ventura-Silva, J. M. Martins, MM Trindade, L. L. Faria, A. C. Barros, S. C. Melo, R. M. Oliveira, I. J. Castro, S. F. Ribeiro, Olga |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, MM Trindade, L. L. Faria, A. C. Barros, S. C. Melo, R. M. Oliveira, I. J. Castro, S. F. Ribeiro, Olga |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Comum |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ventura-Silva, J. M. Martins, MM Trindade, L. L. Faria, A. C. Barros, S. C. Melo, R. M. Oliveira, I. J. Castro, S. F. Ribeiro, Olga |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nursing work method Work methods Nurses |
topic |
Nursing work method Work methods Nurses |
description |
Background. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method, individual work method, and work method per reference nurse). As for the impact of the work method on clients, we highlight the interference in the quality of care provided and, regarding nurses, the impact on workload and job satisfaction. Therefore, the existence of tools that allow identifying the organizational methodologies of nursing care is relevant. Aim. The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the nurses assessment scale (NWMAS). Methods. The methodological study followed the recommendations of the EQUATOR network. The NWMAS was previously developed as a self-completion questionnaire. To determine construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. 325 participants were enrolled in this study. In exploratory factor analysis, the 25 items comprising NWMAS were distributed in five dimensions, contemplating the work methods. Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale was 0.846. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit. Conclusion. The NWMAS is a valid and reliable tool. Implications for Nursing Practice. The NWMAS identifies the work methods adopted by nurses in hospital settings, is a valuable tool for nursing management, and contributes to the definition of strategies that promote the quality of nursing care and the safety of patients |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-28T11:50:57Z 2023 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/46835 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/46835 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ventura-Silva, J. M., Martins, M. M., Trindade, L. L., Faria, A. C., Barros, S. C., Melo, R. M., Oliveira, I. J., Castro, S. F., & Ribeiro, O. M. (2023). Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation. Nursing Forum, 2023, 8884183. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8884183 10.1155/2023/8884183 1744-6198 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hindawi and Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hindawi and Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133599283281920 |