A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Casaleiro, Paula
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Relvas, Ana Paula, Dias, João Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422
https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334
Resumo: The article presents a comprehensive critical review of the empirical literature on judges and public prosecutors’ working conditions in different disciplinary areas from the last 40 years, identifying studies’ characteristics and key results. Although judicial professionals are recognised as having a highly demanding working environment and are one of the groups most vulnerable to occupational stress, studies on this subject are scarce and relatively new. These can be divided into two distinct categories: psychology research studies centred on psychosocial risks and professional stress and burnout; and studies in the field of the sociology of law on questions such as job satisfaction and organisation of work. This review aims to highlight the increasing importance of pursuing studies on the working conditions of professionals responsible for delivering justice with quality and guarantees for all citizens. Without proper and high-quality judicial working conditions the probability increases of having a malfunctioning judicial system delivering poor decisions.
id RCAP_524e736eb0cce3fbd44cc79453a1997f
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/93422
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ StudiesWorking conditionsJudicial professionalsProfessional stressBurnoutThe article presents a comprehensive critical review of the empirical literature on judges and public prosecutors’ working conditions in different disciplinary areas from the last 40 years, identifying studies’ characteristics and key results. Although judicial professionals are recognised as having a highly demanding working environment and are one of the groups most vulnerable to occupational stress, studies on this subject are scarce and relatively new. These can be divided into two distinct categories: psychology research studies centred on psychosocial risks and professional stress and burnout; and studies in the field of the sociology of law on questions such as job satisfaction and organisation of work. This review aims to highlight the increasing importance of pursuing studies on the working conditions of professionals responsible for delivering justice with quality and guarantees for all citizens. Without proper and high-quality judicial working conditions the probability increases of having a malfunctioning judicial system delivering poor decisions.International Association for Court Administration2021-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334eng2156-7964http://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334Casaleiro, PaulaRelvas, Ana PaulaDias, João Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-05-25T09:44:41Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/93422Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:12:22.118616Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
title A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
spellingShingle A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
Casaleiro, Paula
Working conditions
Judicial professionals
Professional stress
Burnout
title_short A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
title_full A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
title_fullStr A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
title_sort A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
author Casaleiro, Paula
author_facet Casaleiro, Paula
Relvas, Ana Paula
Dias, João Paulo
author_role author
author2 Relvas, Ana Paula
Dias, João Paulo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Casaleiro, Paula
Relvas, Ana Paula
Dias, João Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Working conditions
Judicial professionals
Professional stress
Burnout
topic Working conditions
Judicial professionals
Professional stress
Burnout
description The article presents a comprehensive critical review of the empirical literature on judges and public prosecutors’ working conditions in different disciplinary areas from the last 40 years, identifying studies’ characteristics and key results. Although judicial professionals are recognised as having a highly demanding working environment and are one of the groups most vulnerable to occupational stress, studies on this subject are scarce and relatively new. These can be divided into two distinct categories: psychology research studies centred on psychosocial risks and professional stress and burnout; and studies in the field of the sociology of law on questions such as job satisfaction and organisation of work. This review aims to highlight the increasing importance of pursuing studies on the working conditions of professionals responsible for delivering justice with quality and guarantees for all citizens. Without proper and high-quality judicial working conditions the probability increases of having a malfunctioning judicial system delivering poor decisions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-11
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422
https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422
https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2156-7964
http://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Association for Court Administration
publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Association for Court Administration
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134019343876096