A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422 https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334 |
Resumo: | The article presents a comprehensive critical review of the empirical literature on judges and public prosecutors’ working conditions in different disciplinary areas from the last 40 years, identifying studies’ characteristics and key results. Although judicial professionals are recognised as having a highly demanding working environment and are one of the groups most vulnerable to occupational stress, studies on this subject are scarce and relatively new. These can be divided into two distinct categories: psychology research studies centred on psychosocial risks and professional stress and burnout; and studies in the field of the sociology of law on questions such as job satisfaction and organisation of work. This review aims to highlight the increasing importance of pursuing studies on the working conditions of professionals responsible for delivering justice with quality and guarantees for all citizens. Without proper and high-quality judicial working conditions the probability increases of having a malfunctioning judicial system delivering poor decisions. |
id |
RCAP_524e736eb0cce3fbd44cc79453a1997f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/93422 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ StudiesWorking conditionsJudicial professionalsProfessional stressBurnoutThe article presents a comprehensive critical review of the empirical literature on judges and public prosecutors’ working conditions in different disciplinary areas from the last 40 years, identifying studies’ characteristics and key results. Although judicial professionals are recognised as having a highly demanding working environment and are one of the groups most vulnerable to occupational stress, studies on this subject are scarce and relatively new. These can be divided into two distinct categories: psychology research studies centred on psychosocial risks and professional stress and burnout; and studies in the field of the sociology of law on questions such as job satisfaction and organisation of work. This review aims to highlight the increasing importance of pursuing studies on the working conditions of professionals responsible for delivering justice with quality and guarantees for all citizens. Without proper and high-quality judicial working conditions the probability increases of having a malfunctioning judicial system delivering poor decisions.International Association for Court Administration2021-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334eng2156-7964http://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334Casaleiro, PaulaRelvas, Ana PaulaDias, João Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-05-25T09:44:41Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/93422Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:12:22.118616Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies |
title |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies |
spellingShingle |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies Casaleiro, Paula Working conditions Judicial professionals Professional stress Burnout |
title_short |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies |
title_full |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies |
title_fullStr |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies |
title_sort |
A Critical Review of Judicial Professionals Working Conditions’ Studies |
author |
Casaleiro, Paula |
author_facet |
Casaleiro, Paula Relvas, Ana Paula Dias, João Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Relvas, Ana Paula Dias, João Paulo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Casaleiro, Paula Relvas, Ana Paula Dias, João Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Working conditions Judicial professionals Professional stress Burnout |
topic |
Working conditions Judicial professionals Professional stress Burnout |
description |
The article presents a comprehensive critical review of the empirical literature on judges and public prosecutors’ working conditions in different disciplinary areas from the last 40 years, identifying studies’ characteristics and key results. Although judicial professionals are recognised as having a highly demanding working environment and are one of the groups most vulnerable to occupational stress, studies on this subject are scarce and relatively new. These can be divided into two distinct categories: psychology research studies centred on psychosocial risks and professional stress and burnout; and studies in the field of the sociology of law on questions such as job satisfaction and organisation of work. This review aims to highlight the increasing importance of pursuing studies on the working conditions of professionals responsible for delivering justice with quality and guarantees for all citizens. Without proper and high-quality judicial working conditions the probability increases of having a malfunctioning judicial system delivering poor decisions. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-11 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422 https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/93422 https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2156-7964 http://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.334 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Association for Court Administration |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Association for Court Administration |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134019343876096 |