Monuments, worksheets, and origami
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e740 |
Resumo: | Planning and developing research on the political use of monuments in Hungary since 2010 led me to a methodological trap and I could not progress by what I understood to be the textbook formula for defining and solving a problem. Although I had a topic, an object, and a feeling that there was something to be investigated, I could neither describe the problem nor the research question in one sentence. I believed I would find the problem by analyzing government acts and public opinion and began the literature review, cataloging monuments and choosing a representative sample. I have treated the monuments as data and ignored that they were the witnesses and victims to be heard. I intend to critically describe this journey through the research object, wrong decisions, and alternative paths that showed me other possibilities. I intend to answer why my starting plan was wrong and what made it possible to correct the route during the research. From field experience, I will illustrate how the individual and collective history of the monuments enabled me to delimit a problem that did not fit into spreadsheets or modeling. The use of authors from architecture, history, linguistics, and memory, among others, allowed a multidisciplinary research perspective that I intend to present briefly. The flexibility of boundaries between areas of knowledge, science, and arts was complementary and should not exclude each other in my research to allow more interpretative freedom in context, space, and time. Additionally, author-network theories and secondary sources, online obtained have been used in my analysis of the research process. I expect to demonstrate that my wrong literal research planning decision inspired by quantitative concepts led me to a place unexplored by me until then: the object as the research object. |
id |
RCAP_5c837349aa3a2445d7065a1a3cd89365 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/740 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Monuments, worksheets, and origamiMonumentos, planilhas e origamiObject as the research objectMonumentsResearch methodologySociology of scienceOral historyObjeto como objeto de pesquisaMonumentosMetodologia de PesquisaSociologia da CiênciaHistória OralPlanning and developing research on the political use of monuments in Hungary since 2010 led me to a methodological trap and I could not progress by what I understood to be the textbook formula for defining and solving a problem. Although I had a topic, an object, and a feeling that there was something to be investigated, I could neither describe the problem nor the research question in one sentence. I believed I would find the problem by analyzing government acts and public opinion and began the literature review, cataloging monuments and choosing a representative sample. I have treated the monuments as data and ignored that they were the witnesses and victims to be heard. I intend to critically describe this journey through the research object, wrong decisions, and alternative paths that showed me other possibilities. I intend to answer why my starting plan was wrong and what made it possible to correct the route during the research. From field experience, I will illustrate how the individual and collective history of the monuments enabled me to delimit a problem that did not fit into spreadsheets or modeling. The use of authors from architecture, history, linguistics, and memory, among others, allowed a multidisciplinary research perspective that I intend to present briefly. The flexibility of boundaries between areas of knowledge, science, and arts was complementary and should not exclude each other in my research to allow more interpretative freedom in context, space, and time. Additionally, author-network theories and secondary sources, online obtained have been used in my analysis of the research process. I expect to demonstrate that my wrong literal research planning decision inspired by quantitative concepts led me to a place unexplored by me until then: the object as the research object.O planeamento e desenvolvimento de uma pesquisa sobre o uso político de monumentos na Hungria desde 2010 me levou a um impasse metodológico e não consegui progressos pelo que entendia ser a fórmula dos manuais para definir e resolver um problema. Embora tivesse um tema, um objeto e um pressentimento de que havia algo a ser investigado, não conseguia descrever em uma frase o problema e nem a questão de pesquisa. Acreditava que encontraria o problema ao analisar os atos do governo e a opinião pública e iniciei a revisão bibliográfica, catalogação de monumentos e escolha de uma amostra representativa. Ao tratar os monumentos como dados, ignorei que eles eram as testemunhas e vítimas a serem ouvidas. Pretendo descrever criticamente essa jornada através do objeto de pesquisa, decisões erradas e caminhos alternativos que me mostraram outras possibilidades. Meu objetivo é responder porque o ponto de partida da minha pesquisa estava errado e o que possibilitou a correção da rota durante o percurso. Partindo da experiência de campo, ilustrarei como a história individual e coletiva dos monumentos me possibilitou delimitar um problema que não cabia em planilhas ou modelagens. O uso de autores da arquitetura, história, linguística, memória, entre outros me possibilitou um olhar multidisciplinar o qual pretendo apresentar brevemente. A flexibilização das fronteiras entre áreas do conhecimento, ciência e artes se complementaram e não foram excludentes entre si nesta pesquisa, permitindo certa liberdade interpretativa no contexto, espaço e tempo. Adicionalmente, as teorias autor-rede e fontes secundárias, obtidos a partir de mecanismos de busca online serão utilizados na análise do processo de investigação. Espero demonstrar que a minha decisão errada de planeamento de pesquisa literal e inspirada em conceitos quantitativos me levou a um lugar até então inexplorado por mim: o objeto como objeto de pesquisa.Ludomedia2022-07-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e740oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/740New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e740New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e740New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e7402184-777010.36367/ntqr.14.2022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/740https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e740https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/740/784https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGraziela Ares2022-09-06T18:57:31Zoai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/740Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:48:32.837317Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Monuments, worksheets, and origami Monumentos, planilhas e origami |
title |
Monuments, worksheets, and origami |
spellingShingle |
Monuments, worksheets, and origami Graziela Ares Object as the research object Monuments Research methodology Sociology of science Oral history Objeto como objeto de pesquisa Monumentos Metodologia de Pesquisa Sociologia da Ciência História Oral |
title_short |
Monuments, worksheets, and origami |
title_full |
Monuments, worksheets, and origami |
title_fullStr |
Monuments, worksheets, and origami |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monuments, worksheets, and origami |
title_sort |
Monuments, worksheets, and origami |
author |
Graziela Ares |
author_facet |
Graziela Ares |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Graziela Ares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Object as the research object Monuments Research methodology Sociology of science Oral history Objeto como objeto de pesquisa Monumentos Metodologia de Pesquisa Sociologia da Ciência História Oral |
topic |
Object as the research object Monuments Research methodology Sociology of science Oral history Objeto como objeto de pesquisa Monumentos Metodologia de Pesquisa Sociologia da Ciência História Oral |
description |
Planning and developing research on the political use of monuments in Hungary since 2010 led me to a methodological trap and I could not progress by what I understood to be the textbook formula for defining and solving a problem. Although I had a topic, an object, and a feeling that there was something to be investigated, I could neither describe the problem nor the research question in one sentence. I believed I would find the problem by analyzing government acts and public opinion and began the literature review, cataloging monuments and choosing a representative sample. I have treated the monuments as data and ignored that they were the witnesses and victims to be heard. I intend to critically describe this journey through the research object, wrong decisions, and alternative paths that showed me other possibilities. I intend to answer why my starting plan was wrong and what made it possible to correct the route during the research. From field experience, I will illustrate how the individual and collective history of the monuments enabled me to delimit a problem that did not fit into spreadsheets or modeling. The use of authors from architecture, history, linguistics, and memory, among others, allowed a multidisciplinary research perspective that I intend to present briefly. The flexibility of boundaries between areas of knowledge, science, and arts was complementary and should not exclude each other in my research to allow more interpretative freedom in context, space, and time. Additionally, author-network theories and secondary sources, online obtained have been used in my analysis of the research process. I expect to demonstrate that my wrong literal research planning decision inspired by quantitative concepts led me to a place unexplored by me until then: the object as the research object. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e740 oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/740 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e740 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/740 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/740 https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e740 https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/740/784 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludomedia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludomedia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e740 New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e740 New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e740 2184-7770 10.36367/ntqr.14.2022 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130351015034880 |