Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37785 |
Resumo: | The scoping review reported by this article aimed to identify (i) the purposes of the studies using crowdsourcing technologies in the context of the smart cities’ implementations, (ii) the characteristics of the crowdsourcing technologies being used, and (iii) the maturity level of the solutions being proposed. An electronic search was conducted, and 29 studies were included in the review after the selection process. The results show a current interest in crowdsourcing campaigns using participatory reporting and participatory sensing to (i) support urban infrastructures’ maintenance, (ii) facilitate urban mobility, (iii) monitor the environment, (iv) manage crowds, (v) aggregate geographical information, and (vi) collect citizens’ perspectives about the cities. However, the results also show low maturity level of the proposed solutions and lack of consolidated evidence about their effectiveness, which difficulties their dissemination. |
id |
RCAP_5cea8fd44fd31501e398606430c97e73 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/37785 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping reviewSmart citiesCitizens’ participationCrowsourcingCrowdsensingThe scoping review reported by this article aimed to identify (i) the purposes of the studies using crowdsourcing technologies in the context of the smart cities’ implementations, (ii) the characteristics of the crowdsourcing technologies being used, and (iii) the maturity level of the solutions being proposed. An electronic search was conducted, and 29 studies were included in the review after the selection process. The results show a current interest in crowdsourcing campaigns using participatory reporting and participatory sensing to (i) support urban infrastructures’ maintenance, (ii) facilitate urban mobility, (iii) monitor the environment, (iv) manage crowds, (v) aggregate geographical information, and (vi) collect citizens’ perspectives about the cities. However, the results also show low maturity level of the proposed solutions and lack of consolidated evidence about their effectiveness, which difficulties their dissemination.Elsevier2023-05-19T09:34:25Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/37785eng1877-050910.1016/j.procs.2023.01.294Bastardo, RutePavão, JoãoRocha, Nelson Pachecoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:13:51Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/37785Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:08:23.331098Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review |
title |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review |
spellingShingle |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review Bastardo, Rute Smart cities Citizens’ participation Crowsourcing Crowdsensing |
title_short |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review |
title_full |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review |
title_sort |
Crowdsourcing technologies to promote citizens’ participation in smart cities, a scoping review |
author |
Bastardo, Rute |
author_facet |
Bastardo, Rute Pavão, João Rocha, Nelson Pacheco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pavão, João Rocha, Nelson Pacheco |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bastardo, Rute Pavão, João Rocha, Nelson Pacheco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Smart cities Citizens’ participation Crowsourcing Crowdsensing |
topic |
Smart cities Citizens’ participation Crowsourcing Crowdsensing |
description |
The scoping review reported by this article aimed to identify (i) the purposes of the studies using crowdsourcing technologies in the context of the smart cities’ implementations, (ii) the characteristics of the crowdsourcing technologies being used, and (iii) the maturity level of the solutions being proposed. An electronic search was conducted, and 29 studies were included in the review after the selection process. The results show a current interest in crowdsourcing campaigns using participatory reporting and participatory sensing to (i) support urban infrastructures’ maintenance, (ii) facilitate urban mobility, (iii) monitor the environment, (iv) manage crowds, (v) aggregate geographical information, and (vi) collect citizens’ perspectives about the cities. However, the results also show low maturity level of the proposed solutions and lack of consolidated evidence about their effectiveness, which difficulties their dissemination. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-19T09:34:25Z 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z 2023 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37785 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37785 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1877-0509 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.294 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137736511193088 |