Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18191 |
Resumo: | Assistive technologies (ATs) are resources to promote the independence and participation of people with a disability. The use of standardized tools, based on outcome measures, is essential for guaranteeing high-quality rates. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with AT–2.0 (QUEST) is a scale to assess the satisfaction of people using any AT. Objectives: To translate and culturally validate the QUEST–2.0 for the Spanish population (QUEST 2.0-ES). Methods: A validation cross-design and descriptive study. The test–retest reliability, validity, and internal consistency of QUEST 2.0-ES were studied. It was divided into two phases: Sample 1 was formed by 26 persons; in sample 2, 30 persons participated. The conditions included neurological conditions, amputations, rare diseases, and deafness. Results: Thirty-five men and 21 women participated in total. The majority of AT used were those for mobility. QUEST 2.0-ES analysis showed internal consistency values between the test (α = 0.87) and retest versions (α = 0.89). The internal consistency was high for AT (test, α = 0.83; retest, α = 0.87) and Service (test, α = 0.80; retest, α = 0.80). The temporal reliability (1–2 weeks) for test–retest was 0.88. Conclusion: QUEST 2.0-ES showed good psychometric properties in terms of validity and test–retest reliability, and it is a good tool to assess the user’s satisfaction with ATs and services. |
id |
RCAP_5fc7e3a978511dd8e4071c64608b94f2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/18191 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES)Outcome measuresAssistive technology (AT)ValidationSpanishSatisfactionAssistive technologies (ATs) are resources to promote the independence and participation of people with a disability. The use of standardized tools, based on outcome measures, is essential for guaranteeing high-quality rates. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with AT–2.0 (QUEST) is a scale to assess the satisfaction of people using any AT. Objectives: To translate and culturally validate the QUEST–2.0 for the Spanish population (QUEST 2.0-ES). Methods: A validation cross-design and descriptive study. The test–retest reliability, validity, and internal consistency of QUEST 2.0-ES were studied. It was divided into two phases: Sample 1 was formed by 26 persons; in sample 2, 30 persons participated. The conditions included neurological conditions, amputations, rare diseases, and deafness. Results: Thirty-five men and 21 women participated in total. The majority of AT used were those for mobility. QUEST 2.0-ES analysis showed internal consistency values between the test (α = 0.87) and retest versions (α = 0.89). The internal consistency was high for AT (test, α = 0.83; retest, α = 0.87) and Service (test, α = 0.80; retest, α = 0.80). The temporal reliability (1–2 weeks) for test–retest was 0.88. Conclusion: QUEST 2.0-ES showed good psychometric properties in terms of validity and test–retest reliability, and it is a good tool to assess the user’s satisfaction with ATs and services.MDPISapientiaGuerreiro, JoãoJiménez-Arberas, EstíbalizPorto Trillo, PatriciaVilar Figueira, OlallaSaénz-López Buñuel, PedroPais, SandraTierra Orta, JoséPousada García, Thais2022-08-30T11:59:33Z2022-07-302022-08-11T11:50:03Z2022-07-30T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18191engInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (15): 9349 (2022)10.3390/ijerph191593491660-4601info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:30:24Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/18191Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:07:57.347759Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES) |
title |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES) |
spellingShingle |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES) Guerreiro, João Outcome measures Assistive technology (AT) Validation Spanish Satisfaction |
title_short |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES) |
title_full |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES) |
title_fullStr |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES) |
title_sort |
Cross-cultural validation of Quebec user satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0 for Spanish population (QUEST-2.0 ES) |
author |
Guerreiro, João |
author_facet |
Guerreiro, João Jiménez-Arberas, Estíbaliz Porto Trillo, Patricia Vilar Figueira, Olalla Saénz-López Buñuel, Pedro Pais, Sandra Tierra Orta, José Pousada García, Thais |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jiménez-Arberas, Estíbaliz Porto Trillo, Patricia Vilar Figueira, Olalla Saénz-López Buñuel, Pedro Pais, Sandra Tierra Orta, José Pousada García, Thais |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Sapientia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guerreiro, João Jiménez-Arberas, Estíbaliz Porto Trillo, Patricia Vilar Figueira, Olalla Saénz-López Buñuel, Pedro Pais, Sandra Tierra Orta, José Pousada García, Thais |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Outcome measures Assistive technology (AT) Validation Spanish Satisfaction |
topic |
Outcome measures Assistive technology (AT) Validation Spanish Satisfaction |
description |
Assistive technologies (ATs) are resources to promote the independence and participation of people with a disability. The use of standardized tools, based on outcome measures, is essential for guaranteeing high-quality rates. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with AT–2.0 (QUEST) is a scale to assess the satisfaction of people using any AT. Objectives: To translate and culturally validate the QUEST–2.0 for the Spanish population (QUEST 2.0-ES). Methods: A validation cross-design and descriptive study. The test–retest reliability, validity, and internal consistency of QUEST 2.0-ES were studied. It was divided into two phases: Sample 1 was formed by 26 persons; in sample 2, 30 persons participated. The conditions included neurological conditions, amputations, rare diseases, and deafness. Results: Thirty-five men and 21 women participated in total. The majority of AT used were those for mobility. QUEST 2.0-ES analysis showed internal consistency values between the test (α = 0.87) and retest versions (α = 0.89). The internal consistency was high for AT (test, α = 0.83; retest, α = 0.87) and Service (test, α = 0.80; retest, α = 0.80). The temporal reliability (1–2 weeks) for test–retest was 0.88. Conclusion: QUEST 2.0-ES showed good psychometric properties in terms of validity and test–retest reliability, and it is a good tool to assess the user’s satisfaction with ATs and services. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-30T11:59:33Z 2022-07-30 2022-08-11T11:50:03Z 2022-07-30T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18191 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18191 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (15): 9349 (2022) 10.3390/ijerph19159349 1660-4601 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133325518962688 |