Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Figueiral, Marta, Sena, André, Pereira, Filipe, Junqueira, Nádia, Velho, Tiago, Almeida, Ana, Nobre, Angelo, Pinto, Fausto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.48729/pjctvs.321
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.321
Resumo: Introduction: Aortic stenosis remains the number one heart valve pathology. The drive to improve the surgical outcomes brought to focus rapid deployment valves (RDV), which reduce aortic cross-clamping and cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) times. However, some centers have reported a higher rate of conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of conduction abnormalities after aortic valve replacement with RDV, as well as its impact on immediate postoperative outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of associated conductions disorders and PPM implantation rates, as well as post-operative outcomes of all patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement between April 2014 and December 2019 with an RDV. Comparative analysis between the group with PPM implantation and the one with no PPM implantation. Patients with previous PPM implantation, reoperations and patients with missing pre or postoperative ECG data were excluded. Results: We studied 201 patients. The majority of conduction abnormalities were left bundle branch block (54,0%). Twenty-six PPM were implanted (12,6%). Pre-operative characteristic between the groups were similar and little differences were found in regard to most complications. However, the PPM group showed significantly higher rates of stroke (7.7% vs 0.0%, p=0.016) and hemodynamic support for longer than 24 hours (60.0% vs 36.1%, p=0.028). From the multivariable analysis, preoperative right bundle branch block was the only independent risk factor associated with PPM. Conclusions: PPM implantation rates with RDV are relatively high and are associated with prolonged hospital and ICU stays, postoperative stroke rates and requirement of aminergic support. Their use should be made on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the existence of preoperative conduction disorders, especially right bundle branch block.
id RCAP_608460c964e0be8cb79d51f66cec2f19
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.pjctvs.com:article/321
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic BioprosthesisAortic valve replacementrapid deployment bioprosthesespacemakercomplete atrioventricular blockIntroduction: Aortic stenosis remains the number one heart valve pathology. The drive to improve the surgical outcomes brought to focus rapid deployment valves (RDV), which reduce aortic cross-clamping and cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) times. However, some centers have reported a higher rate of conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of conduction abnormalities after aortic valve replacement with RDV, as well as its impact on immediate postoperative outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of associated conductions disorders and PPM implantation rates, as well as post-operative outcomes of all patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement between April 2014 and December 2019 with an RDV. Comparative analysis between the group with PPM implantation and the one with no PPM implantation. Patients with previous PPM implantation, reoperations and patients with missing pre or postoperative ECG data were excluded. Results: We studied 201 patients. The majority of conduction abnormalities were left bundle branch block (54,0%). Twenty-six PPM were implanted (12,6%). Pre-operative characteristic between the groups were similar and little differences were found in regard to most complications. However, the PPM group showed significantly higher rates of stroke (7.7% vs 0.0%, p=0.016) and hemodynamic support for longer than 24 hours (60.0% vs 36.1%, p=0.028). From the multivariable analysis, preoperative right bundle branch block was the only independent risk factor associated with PPM. Conclusions: PPM implantation rates with RDV are relatively high and are associated with prolonged hospital and ICU stays, postoperative stroke rates and requirement of aminergic support. Their use should be made on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the existence of preoperative conduction disorders, especially right bundle branch block.SOCIEDADE PORTUGUESA DE CIRURGIA CARDIO-TORÁCICA E VASCULAR2023-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.321https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.321Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar; 23-302184-9927reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://pjctvs.com/index.php/journal/article/view/321https://pjctvs.com/index.php/journal/article/view/321/298Copyright (c) 2023 Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, RicardoFigueiral, MartaSena, AndréPereira, FilipeJunqueira, NádiaVelho, TiagoAlmeida, AnaNobre, AngeloPinto, Fausto2023-04-08T04:40:36Zoai:oai.pjctvs.com:article/321Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:49:00.779386Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
title Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
spellingShingle Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
Ferreira, Ricardo
Aortic valve replacement
rapid deployment bioprostheses
pacemaker
complete atrioventricular block
Ferreira, Ricardo
Aortic valve replacement
rapid deployment bioprostheses
pacemaker
complete atrioventricular block
title_short Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
title_full Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
title_fullStr Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
title_sort Conduction Disorders And Their Clinical Impact After Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Aortic Bioprosthesis
author Ferreira, Ricardo
author_facet Ferreira, Ricardo
Ferreira, Ricardo
Figueiral, Marta
Sena, André
Pereira, Filipe
Junqueira, Nádia
Velho, Tiago
Almeida, Ana
Nobre, Angelo
Pinto, Fausto
Figueiral, Marta
Sena, André
Pereira, Filipe
Junqueira, Nádia
Velho, Tiago
Almeida, Ana
Nobre, Angelo
Pinto, Fausto
author_role author
author2 Figueiral, Marta
Sena, André
Pereira, Filipe
Junqueira, Nádia
Velho, Tiago
Almeida, Ana
Nobre, Angelo
Pinto, Fausto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Ricardo
Figueiral, Marta
Sena, André
Pereira, Filipe
Junqueira, Nádia
Velho, Tiago
Almeida, Ana
Nobre, Angelo
Pinto, Fausto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aortic valve replacement
rapid deployment bioprostheses
pacemaker
complete atrioventricular block
topic Aortic valve replacement
rapid deployment bioprostheses
pacemaker
complete atrioventricular block
description Introduction: Aortic stenosis remains the number one heart valve pathology. The drive to improve the surgical outcomes brought to focus rapid deployment valves (RDV), which reduce aortic cross-clamping and cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) times. However, some centers have reported a higher rate of conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of conduction abnormalities after aortic valve replacement with RDV, as well as its impact on immediate postoperative outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of associated conductions disorders and PPM implantation rates, as well as post-operative outcomes of all patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement between April 2014 and December 2019 with an RDV. Comparative analysis between the group with PPM implantation and the one with no PPM implantation. Patients with previous PPM implantation, reoperations and patients with missing pre or postoperative ECG data were excluded. Results: We studied 201 patients. The majority of conduction abnormalities were left bundle branch block (54,0%). Twenty-six PPM were implanted (12,6%). Pre-operative characteristic between the groups were similar and little differences were found in regard to most complications. However, the PPM group showed significantly higher rates of stroke (7.7% vs 0.0%, p=0.016) and hemodynamic support for longer than 24 hours (60.0% vs 36.1%, p=0.028). From the multivariable analysis, preoperative right bundle branch block was the only independent risk factor associated with PPM. Conclusions: PPM implantation rates with RDV are relatively high and are associated with prolonged hospital and ICU stays, postoperative stroke rates and requirement of aminergic support. Their use should be made on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the existence of preoperative conduction disorders, especially right bundle branch block.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-04
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.321
https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.321
url https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.321
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pjctvs.com/index.php/journal/article/view/321
https://pjctvs.com/index.php/journal/article/view/321/298
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SOCIEDADE PORTUGUESA DE CIRURGIA CARDIO-TORÁCICA E VASCULAR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SOCIEDADE PORTUGUESA DE CIRURGIA CARDIO-TORÁCICA E VASCULAR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023): Jan - Mar; 23-30
2184-9927
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822239125322858496
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.48729/pjctvs.321