A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yang, Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25770/artc.11152
Resumo: In 1959 C.P. Snow published his widely influential Two Cultures, which set out to diagnose the then discernibly growing divide between the humanities and the sciences.  Although Snow’s recognition was prescient in light of today’s capital-intensive domination of the sciences over the ever-fractured, underfunded humanities in the neoliberal university, his analysis was based on a one-dimensional faith in scientific progress.  Contrary to Snow’s condescending characterization of Luddites and their intellectual analogues as indulging in an “Edenic fantasy”, the compatriot social historians of Snow’s times revealed the exact opposite: that it was the historical process of enclosures and capitalist expropriation that prompted the commoners’ insurrectionary struggles of machine-breaking in defense of their culture at the point of production and reproduction.  Any collective effort toward the making of a “third culture” is bound to fail without properly situating the arts/sciences cultural divide as an organic part of this historical privatization of knowledge and social relations.
id RCAP_618ccdb19abbfa480fcf5be341390df3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/11152
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century LaterA Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century LaterESSAYIn 1959 C.P. Snow published his widely influential Two Cultures, which set out to diagnose the then discernibly growing divide between the humanities and the sciences.  Although Snow’s recognition was prescient in light of today’s capital-intensive domination of the sciences over the ever-fractured, underfunded humanities in the neoliberal university, his analysis was based on a one-dimensional faith in scientific progress.  Contrary to Snow’s condescending characterization of Luddites and their intellectual analogues as indulging in an “Edenic fantasy”, the compatriot social historians of Snow’s times revealed the exact opposite: that it was the historical process of enclosures and capitalist expropriation that prompted the commoners’ insurrectionary struggles of machine-breaking in defense of their culture at the point of production and reproduction.  Any collective effort toward the making of a “third culture” is bound to fail without properly situating the arts/sciences cultural divide as an organic part of this historical privatization of knowledge and social relations.2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25770/artc.11152por1646-3463Yang, Manuelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-10T15:45:52Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/11152Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:57:20.722948Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
title A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
spellingShingle A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
Yang, Manuel
ESSAY
title_short A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
title_full A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
title_fullStr A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
title_full_unstemmed A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
title_sort A Historical Bridge over the Troubled Water of Humanities and Sciences: Rethinking C.P. Snow’s The Two Cultures Half-a-Century Later
author Yang, Manuel
author_facet Yang, Manuel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yang, Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ESSAY
topic ESSAY
description In 1959 C.P. Snow published his widely influential Two Cultures, which set out to diagnose the then discernibly growing divide between the humanities and the sciences.  Although Snow’s recognition was prescient in light of today’s capital-intensive domination of the sciences over the ever-fractured, underfunded humanities in the neoliberal university, his analysis was based on a one-dimensional faith in scientific progress.  Contrary to Snow’s condescending characterization of Luddites and their intellectual analogues as indulging in an “Edenic fantasy”, the compatriot social historians of Snow’s times revealed the exact opposite: that it was the historical process of enclosures and capitalist expropriation that prompted the commoners’ insurrectionary struggles of machine-breaking in defense of their culture at the point of production and reproduction.  Any collective effort toward the making of a “third culture” is bound to fail without properly situating the arts/sciences cultural divide as an organic part of this historical privatization of knowledge and social relations.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25770/artc.11152
url https://doi.org/10.25770/artc.11152
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1646-3463
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130441001730048