Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso, Teresa
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Orquídea, Aragão, Irene, Costa-Pereira, Altamiro, Sarmento, António
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208
Resumo: Introduction: Microbiological profiles were analysed and compared for intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections according to place of acquisition: community-acquired, with a separate analysis of healthcare-associated, and hospital-acquired.Material and Methods: Prospective cohort study performed at a university tertiary care hospital over 1 year. Inclusion criteria were meeting the Centers for Disease Control definition of intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections.Results: A total of 1035 patients were included in the study. More than 25% of intra-abdominal infections were polymicrobial; multi-drug resistant gram-negatives were 38% in community-acquired, 50% in healthcare-associated and 57% in hospital-acquired. E. coli was the most prevalent among urinary infections: 69% in community-acquired, 56% in healthcare-associated and 26% in hospital-acquired; ESBL producers’ pathogens were 10% in healthcare-associated and 3% in community-acquired and hospital-acquired. In respiratoryinfections Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most prevalent in community-acquired (54%) and MRSA in healthcare-associated (24%) and hospital-acquired (24%). A significant association was found between MRSA respiratory infection and hospitalization in the previous year (adjusted OR = 6.3), previous instrumentation (adjusted OR = 4.3) and previous antibiotic therapy (adjusted OR = 5.7); no cases were documented among patients without risk factors. Hospital mortality rate was 10% in community-acquired, 14% in healthcare-associated and 19% in hospital-acquired infection.Discussion and Conclusion: This study shows that healthcare-associated has a different microbiologic profile than those from community or hospital acquired for the four main focus of infection. Knowledge of this fact is important because the existing guidelines for community-acquired are not entirely applicable for this group of patients.
id RCAP_626000b826a087a856643c7474788223
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired InfectionsDiferenças no Perfil Microbiológico entre as Infecções da Comunidade, Associadas a Cuidados de Saúde e NosocomiaisIntroduction: Microbiological profiles were analysed and compared for intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections according to place of acquisition: community-acquired, with a separate analysis of healthcare-associated, and hospital-acquired.Material and Methods: Prospective cohort study performed at a university tertiary care hospital over 1 year. Inclusion criteria were meeting the Centers for Disease Control definition of intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections.Results: A total of 1035 patients were included in the study. More than 25% of intra-abdominal infections were polymicrobial; multi-drug resistant gram-negatives were 38% in community-acquired, 50% in healthcare-associated and 57% in hospital-acquired. E. coli was the most prevalent among urinary infections: 69% in community-acquired, 56% in healthcare-associated and 26% in hospital-acquired; ESBL producers’ pathogens were 10% in healthcare-associated and 3% in community-acquired and hospital-acquired. In respiratoryinfections Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most prevalent in community-acquired (54%) and MRSA in healthcare-associated (24%) and hospital-acquired (24%). A significant association was found between MRSA respiratory infection and hospitalization in the previous year (adjusted OR = 6.3), previous instrumentation (adjusted OR = 4.3) and previous antibiotic therapy (adjusted OR = 5.7); no cases were documented among patients without risk factors. Hospital mortality rate was 10% in community-acquired, 14% in healthcare-associated and 19% in hospital-acquired infection.Discussion and Conclusion: This study shows that healthcare-associated has a different microbiologic profile than those from community or hospital acquired for the four main focus of infection. Knowledge of this fact is important because the existing guidelines for community-acquired are not entirely applicable for this group of patients.Introdução: Analisamos e comparamos os perfis microbiológicos, das infecções intra-abdominais, urinárias, respiratórias e bacteriemias, conforme o local de aquisição: da comunidade, com separação das infecções associadas a cuidados de saúde, ou nosocomiais.Material e Métodos: Coorte prospectiva, desenvolvida num hospital universitário ao longo de um ano. Critério de inclusão: cumprir a definição de infecção intra-abdominal, urinária, respiratória ou bacteriemia do Centers for Disease Control.Resultados: Foram incluídos 1035 doentes. Nas infecções intra-abdominais mais de 25% eram polimicrobianas; a percentagem de gram-negativos multi-resistentes foi 38% na comunidade, 50% nas associadas a cuidados de saúde e 57% nas nosocomiais. A E. coli foi o agente mais frequente nas infecções urinárias: 69% na comunidade, 56% nas associadas a cuidados de saúde e 26% nas nosocomiais; a produção de ESBL foi 10% nas associadas a cuidados de saúde e 3% na comunidade e nosocomiais. Nas infecções respiratórias o Streptococcus pneumonia foi o agente mais frequente na comunidade (54%) e o MRSA o mais frequente nas associadas a cuidados de saúde (24%) e nosocomiais (24%). Foi encontrada uma associação significativa entre a infecção por MRSA e a hospitalização no último ano (OR ajustado = 6,3), instrumentação prévia (OR ajustado = 4,3) e antibioterapia prévia (OR = 5,7); não se documentaram casos em doentes sem estes factores de risco. A mortalidade hospitalar foi 10% na infecção da comunidade, 14%nas associadas a cuidados de saúde e 19% na nosocomial.Discussão e Conclusão: Este estudo demonstra que as infecções associadas a cuidados de saúde apresentam perfis microbiológicos diferentes das da comunidade e nosocomiais para cada foco de infecção. Este conhecimento é importante porque as recomendações existentes para as infecções da comunidade não se aplicam a este grupo de doentes.Ordem dos Médicos2013-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2013): July-August; 377-384Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 26 N.º 4 (2013): Julho-Agosto; 377-3841646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208/3711Cardoso, TeresaRibeiro, OrquídeaAragão, IreneCosta-Pereira, AltamiroSarmento, Antónioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T10:55:53Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:16:23.533990Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
Diferenças no Perfil Microbiológico entre as Infecções da Comunidade, Associadas a Cuidados de Saúde e Nosocomiais
title Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
spellingShingle Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
Cardoso, Teresa
title_short Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
title_full Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
title_fullStr Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
title_sort Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
author Cardoso, Teresa
author_facet Cardoso, Teresa
Ribeiro, Orquídea
Aragão, Irene
Costa-Pereira, Altamiro
Sarmento, António
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Orquídea
Aragão, Irene
Costa-Pereira, Altamiro
Sarmento, António
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso, Teresa
Ribeiro, Orquídea
Aragão, Irene
Costa-Pereira, Altamiro
Sarmento, António
description Introduction: Microbiological profiles were analysed and compared for intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections according to place of acquisition: community-acquired, with a separate analysis of healthcare-associated, and hospital-acquired.Material and Methods: Prospective cohort study performed at a university tertiary care hospital over 1 year. Inclusion criteria were meeting the Centers for Disease Control definition of intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections.Results: A total of 1035 patients were included in the study. More than 25% of intra-abdominal infections were polymicrobial; multi-drug resistant gram-negatives were 38% in community-acquired, 50% in healthcare-associated and 57% in hospital-acquired. E. coli was the most prevalent among urinary infections: 69% in community-acquired, 56% in healthcare-associated and 26% in hospital-acquired; ESBL producers’ pathogens were 10% in healthcare-associated and 3% in community-acquired and hospital-acquired. In respiratoryinfections Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most prevalent in community-acquired (54%) and MRSA in healthcare-associated (24%) and hospital-acquired (24%). A significant association was found between MRSA respiratory infection and hospitalization in the previous year (adjusted OR = 6.3), previous instrumentation (adjusted OR = 4.3) and previous antibiotic therapy (adjusted OR = 5.7); no cases were documented among patients without risk factors. Hospital mortality rate was 10% in community-acquired, 14% in healthcare-associated and 19% in hospital-acquired infection.Discussion and Conclusion: This study shows that healthcare-associated has a different microbiologic profile than those from community or hospital acquired for the four main focus of infection. Knowledge of this fact is important because the existing guidelines for community-acquired are not entirely applicable for this group of patients.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208/3711
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2013): July-August; 377-384
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 26 N.º 4 (2013): Julho-Agosto; 377-384
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130617801080832