Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Microbiological profiles were analysed and compared for intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections according to place of acquisition: community-acquired, with a separate analysis of healthcare-associated, and hospital-acquired.Material and Methods: Prospective cohort study performed at a university tertiary care hospital over 1 year. Inclusion criteria were meeting the Centers for Disease Control definition of intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections.Results: A total of 1035 patients were included in the study. More than 25% of intra-abdominal infections were polymicrobial; multi-drug resistant gram-negatives were 38% in community-acquired, 50% in healthcare-associated and 57% in hospital-acquired. E. coli was the most prevalent among urinary infections: 69% in community-acquired, 56% in healthcare-associated and 26% in hospital-acquired; ESBL producers’ pathogens were 10% in healthcare-associated and 3% in community-acquired and hospital-acquired. In respiratoryinfections Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most prevalent in community-acquired (54%) and MRSA in healthcare-associated (24%) and hospital-acquired (24%). A significant association was found between MRSA respiratory infection and hospitalization in the previous year (adjusted OR = 6.3), previous instrumentation (adjusted OR = 4.3) and previous antibiotic therapy (adjusted OR = 5.7); no cases were documented among patients without risk factors. Hospital mortality rate was 10% in community-acquired, 14% in healthcare-associated and 19% in hospital-acquired infection.Discussion and Conclusion: This study shows that healthcare-associated has a different microbiologic profile than those from community or hospital acquired for the four main focus of infection. Knowledge of this fact is important because the existing guidelines for community-acquired are not entirely applicable for this group of patients. |
id |
RCAP_626000b826a087a856643c7474788223 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired InfectionsDiferenças no Perfil Microbiológico entre as Infecções da Comunidade, Associadas a Cuidados de Saúde e NosocomiaisIntroduction: Microbiological profiles were analysed and compared for intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections according to place of acquisition: community-acquired, with a separate analysis of healthcare-associated, and hospital-acquired.Material and Methods: Prospective cohort study performed at a university tertiary care hospital over 1 year. Inclusion criteria were meeting the Centers for Disease Control definition of intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections.Results: A total of 1035 patients were included in the study. More than 25% of intra-abdominal infections were polymicrobial; multi-drug resistant gram-negatives were 38% in community-acquired, 50% in healthcare-associated and 57% in hospital-acquired. E. coli was the most prevalent among urinary infections: 69% in community-acquired, 56% in healthcare-associated and 26% in hospital-acquired; ESBL producers’ pathogens were 10% in healthcare-associated and 3% in community-acquired and hospital-acquired. In respiratoryinfections Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most prevalent in community-acquired (54%) and MRSA in healthcare-associated (24%) and hospital-acquired (24%). A significant association was found between MRSA respiratory infection and hospitalization in the previous year (adjusted OR = 6.3), previous instrumentation (adjusted OR = 4.3) and previous antibiotic therapy (adjusted OR = 5.7); no cases were documented among patients without risk factors. Hospital mortality rate was 10% in community-acquired, 14% in healthcare-associated and 19% in hospital-acquired infection.Discussion and Conclusion: This study shows that healthcare-associated has a different microbiologic profile than those from community or hospital acquired for the four main focus of infection. Knowledge of this fact is important because the existing guidelines for community-acquired are not entirely applicable for this group of patients.Introdução: Analisamos e comparamos os perfis microbiológicos, das infecções intra-abdominais, urinárias, respiratórias e bacteriemias, conforme o local de aquisição: da comunidade, com separação das infecções associadas a cuidados de saúde, ou nosocomiais.Material e Métodos: Coorte prospectiva, desenvolvida num hospital universitário ao longo de um ano. Critério de inclusão: cumprir a definição de infecção intra-abdominal, urinária, respiratória ou bacteriemia do Centers for Disease Control.Resultados: Foram incluídos 1035 doentes. Nas infecções intra-abdominais mais de 25% eram polimicrobianas; a percentagem de gram-negativos multi-resistentes foi 38% na comunidade, 50% nas associadas a cuidados de saúde e 57% nas nosocomiais. A E. coli foi o agente mais frequente nas infecções urinárias: 69% na comunidade, 56% nas associadas a cuidados de saúde e 26% nas nosocomiais; a produção de ESBL foi 10% nas associadas a cuidados de saúde e 3% na comunidade e nosocomiais. Nas infecções respiratórias o Streptococcus pneumonia foi o agente mais frequente na comunidade (54%) e o MRSA o mais frequente nas associadas a cuidados de saúde (24%) e nosocomiais (24%). Foi encontrada uma associação significativa entre a infecção por MRSA e a hospitalização no último ano (OR ajustado = 6,3), instrumentação prévia (OR ajustado = 4,3) e antibioterapia prévia (OR = 5,7); não se documentaram casos em doentes sem estes factores de risco. A mortalidade hospitalar foi 10% na infecção da comunidade, 14%nas associadas a cuidados de saúde e 19% na nosocomial.Discussão e Conclusão: Este estudo demonstra que as infecções associadas a cuidados de saúde apresentam perfis microbiológicos diferentes das da comunidade e nosocomiais para cada foco de infecção. Este conhecimento é importante porque as recomendações existentes para as infecções da comunidade não se aplicam a este grupo de doentes.Ordem dos Médicos2013-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2013): July-August; 377-384Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 26 N.º 4 (2013): Julho-Agosto; 377-3841646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208/3711Cardoso, TeresaRibeiro, OrquídeaAragão, IreneCosta-Pereira, AltamiroSarmento, Antónioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T10:55:53Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:16:23.533990Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections Diferenças no Perfil Microbiológico entre as Infecções da Comunidade, Associadas a Cuidados de Saúde e Nosocomiais |
title |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections |
spellingShingle |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections Cardoso, Teresa |
title_short |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections |
title_full |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections |
title_fullStr |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections |
title_sort |
Differences in Microbiological Profile between Community-Acquired, Healthcare-Associated and Hospital-Acquired Infections |
author |
Cardoso, Teresa |
author_facet |
Cardoso, Teresa Ribeiro, Orquídea Aragão, Irene Costa-Pereira, Altamiro Sarmento, António |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Orquídea Aragão, Irene Costa-Pereira, Altamiro Sarmento, António |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso, Teresa Ribeiro, Orquídea Aragão, Irene Costa-Pereira, Altamiro Sarmento, António |
description |
Introduction: Microbiological profiles were analysed and compared for intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections according to place of acquisition: community-acquired, with a separate analysis of healthcare-associated, and hospital-acquired.Material and Methods: Prospective cohort study performed at a university tertiary care hospital over 1 year. Inclusion criteria were meeting the Centers for Disease Control definition of intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections.Results: A total of 1035 patients were included in the study. More than 25% of intra-abdominal infections were polymicrobial; multi-drug resistant gram-negatives were 38% in community-acquired, 50% in healthcare-associated and 57% in hospital-acquired. E. coli was the most prevalent among urinary infections: 69% in community-acquired, 56% in healthcare-associated and 26% in hospital-acquired; ESBL producers’ pathogens were 10% in healthcare-associated and 3% in community-acquired and hospital-acquired. In respiratoryinfections Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most prevalent in community-acquired (54%) and MRSA in healthcare-associated (24%) and hospital-acquired (24%). A significant association was found between MRSA respiratory infection and hospitalization in the previous year (adjusted OR = 6.3), previous instrumentation (adjusted OR = 4.3) and previous antibiotic therapy (adjusted OR = 5.7); no cases were documented among patients without risk factors. Hospital mortality rate was 10% in community-acquired, 14% in healthcare-associated and 19% in hospital-acquired infection.Discussion and Conclusion: This study shows that healthcare-associated has a different microbiologic profile than those from community or hospital acquired for the four main focus of infection. Knowledge of this fact is important because the existing guidelines for community-acquired are not entirely applicable for this group of patients. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/208 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/208/3711 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2013): July-August; 377-384 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 26 N.º 4 (2013): Julho-Agosto; 377-384 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130617801080832 |