Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49386 |
Resumo: | For some time, business improvement districts (BIDs) have entered into the discourse and practice of academics and urban planners. This model for town centre revitalization was created in North America, whose success has led to its transfer to a growing number of countries. This evolution highlights the importance of BIDs as an urban planning practice, as well as an object of study for academics interested in new models for intervening in central urban areas. BIDs are public–private partnerships, framed within an entrepreneurial logic of urban management that aims to increase the cities’ competitiveness. In this article, we aim to unfold the main research subjects of the literature focused on BIDs. We develop a systematic review for said endeavor, resorting to the established PRISMA protocol. After the screening and analysis of selected articles, four main research subjects were documented: (i) urban governance; (ii) urban policies: mobility and transfer; (iii) activities/axis of intervention; and (iv) types of BIDs/places of intervention. The selected literature enhances the contradictory nature of BIDs, ranging from the economic revitalization of city centres to the occasional exclusionary stance, in which it is developed. Our analysis also points to the important role of different actors in all stages of the policy transfer and implementation. |
id |
RCAP_64295dda624965aa339409d4d6c72da9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/49386 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center RevitalizationBusiness improvement districtsNeoliberalismNeoliberalisationPolicy transferPolicy mobilitiesPublic–private partnershipUrban governancePrivatizationUrban regenerationFor some time, business improvement districts (BIDs) have entered into the discourse and practice of academics and urban planners. This model for town centre revitalization was created in North America, whose success has led to its transfer to a growing number of countries. This evolution highlights the importance of BIDs as an urban planning practice, as well as an object of study for academics interested in new models for intervening in central urban areas. BIDs are public–private partnerships, framed within an entrepreneurial logic of urban management that aims to increase the cities’ competitiveness. In this article, we aim to unfold the main research subjects of the literature focused on BIDs. We develop a systematic review for said endeavor, resorting to the established PRISMA protocol. After the screening and analysis of selected articles, four main research subjects were documented: (i) urban governance; (ii) urban policies: mobility and transfer; (iii) activities/axis of intervention; and (iv) types of BIDs/places of intervention. The selected literature enhances the contradictory nature of BIDs, ranging from the economic revitalization of city centres to the occasional exclusionary stance, in which it is developed. Our analysis also points to the important role of different actors in all stages of the policy transfer and implementation.MDPIRepositório da Universidade de LisboaGuimarães, Pedro2021-09-01T14:01:34Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/49386engGuimarães, P. (2021). Business Improvement Districts: a systematic review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center revitalization. Land 10(9), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/land100909222073-445X10.3390/land10090922info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:53:09Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/49386Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:01:02.828872Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization |
title |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization |
spellingShingle |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization Guimarães, Pedro Business improvement districts Neoliberalism Neoliberalisation Policy transfer Policy mobilities Public–private partnership Urban governance Privatization Urban regeneration |
title_short |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization |
title_full |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization |
title_fullStr |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization |
title_sort |
Business Improvement Districts: A Systematic Review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center Revitalization |
author |
Guimarães, Pedro |
author_facet |
Guimarães, Pedro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, Pedro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Business improvement districts Neoliberalism Neoliberalisation Policy transfer Policy mobilities Public–private partnership Urban governance Privatization Urban regeneration |
topic |
Business improvement districts Neoliberalism Neoliberalisation Policy transfer Policy mobilities Public–private partnership Urban governance Privatization Urban regeneration |
description |
For some time, business improvement districts (BIDs) have entered into the discourse and practice of academics and urban planners. This model for town centre revitalization was created in North America, whose success has led to its transfer to a growing number of countries. This evolution highlights the importance of BIDs as an urban planning practice, as well as an object of study for academics interested in new models for intervening in central urban areas. BIDs are public–private partnerships, framed within an entrepreneurial logic of urban management that aims to increase the cities’ competitiveness. In this article, we aim to unfold the main research subjects of the literature focused on BIDs. We develop a systematic review for said endeavor, resorting to the established PRISMA protocol. After the screening and analysis of selected articles, four main research subjects were documented: (i) urban governance; (ii) urban policies: mobility and transfer; (iii) activities/axis of intervention; and (iv) types of BIDs/places of intervention. The selected literature enhances the contradictory nature of BIDs, ranging from the economic revitalization of city centres to the occasional exclusionary stance, in which it is developed. Our analysis also points to the important role of different actors in all stages of the policy transfer and implementation. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01T14:01:34Z 2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49386 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/49386 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, P. (2021). Business Improvement Districts: a systematic review of an Urban Governance Model towards City Center revitalization. Land 10(9), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10090922 2073-445X 10.3390/land10090922 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134558783799296 |