Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pratas, T. E.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Ramos, F. R., Rubio, L. J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28946
Resumo: This study aims to evaluate forecasting properties of classic methodologies (ARCH and GARCH models) in comparison with deep learning methodologies (MLP, RNN, and LSTM architectures) for predicting Bitcoin's volatility. As a new asset class with unique characteristics, Bitcoin's high volatility and structural breaks make forecasting challenging. Based on 2753 observations from 08-09-2014 to 01-05-2022, this study focuses on Bitcoin logarithmic returns. Results show that deep learning methodologies have advantages in terms of forecast quality, although significant computational costs are required. Although both MLP and RNN models produce smoother forecasts with less fluctuation, they fail to capture large spikes. The LSTM architecture, on the other hand, reacts strongly to such movements and tries to adjust its forecast accordingly. To compare forecasting accuracy at different horizons MAPE, MAE metrics are used. Diebold-Mariano tests were conducted to compare the forecast, confirming the superiority of deep learning methodologies. Overall, this study suggests that deep learning methodologies could provide a promising tool for forecasting Bitcoin returns (and therefore volatility), especially for short-term horizons.
id RCAP_67aa6c39f6be1c67d179d1c1c8296431
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/28946
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learningCryptocurrenciesBitcoinARCH/GARCH modelsDeep learningForecastingPrediction errorThis study aims to evaluate forecasting properties of classic methodologies (ARCH and GARCH models) in comparison with deep learning methodologies (MLP, RNN, and LSTM architectures) for predicting Bitcoin's volatility. As a new asset class with unique characteristics, Bitcoin's high volatility and structural breaks make forecasting challenging. Based on 2753 observations from 08-09-2014 to 01-05-2022, this study focuses on Bitcoin logarithmic returns. Results show that deep learning methodologies have advantages in terms of forecast quality, although significant computational costs are required. Although both MLP and RNN models produce smoother forecasts with less fluctuation, they fail to capture large spikes. The LSTM architecture, on the other hand, reacts strongly to such movements and tries to adjust its forecast accordingly. To compare forecasting accuracy at different horizons MAPE, MAE metrics are used. Diebold-Mariano tests were conducted to compare the forecast, confirming the superiority of deep learning methodologies. Overall, this study suggests that deep learning methodologies could provide a promising tool for forecasting Bitcoin returns (and therefore volatility), especially for short-term horizons.Springer2023-07-05T16:56:36Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z20232023-07-05T17:55:06Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/28946eng1309-422X10.1007/s40822-023-00232-0Pratas, T. E.Ramos, F. R.Rubio, L. J.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:34:27Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/28946Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:15:34.707496Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning
title Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning
spellingShingle Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning
Pratas, T. E.
Cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin
ARCH/GARCH models
Deep learning
Forecasting
Prediction error
title_short Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning
title_full Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning
title_fullStr Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning
title_sort Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Exploring the potential of deep learning
author Pratas, T. E.
author_facet Pratas, T. E.
Ramos, F. R.
Rubio, L. J.
author_role author
author2 Ramos, F. R.
Rubio, L. J.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pratas, T. E.
Ramos, F. R.
Rubio, L. J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin
ARCH/GARCH models
Deep learning
Forecasting
Prediction error
topic Cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin
ARCH/GARCH models
Deep learning
Forecasting
Prediction error
description This study aims to evaluate forecasting properties of classic methodologies (ARCH and GARCH models) in comparison with deep learning methodologies (MLP, RNN, and LSTM architectures) for predicting Bitcoin's volatility. As a new asset class with unique characteristics, Bitcoin's high volatility and structural breaks make forecasting challenging. Based on 2753 observations from 08-09-2014 to 01-05-2022, this study focuses on Bitcoin logarithmic returns. Results show that deep learning methodologies have advantages in terms of forecast quality, although significant computational costs are required. Although both MLP and RNN models produce smoother forecasts with less fluctuation, they fail to capture large spikes. The LSTM architecture, on the other hand, reacts strongly to such movements and tries to adjust its forecast accordingly. To compare forecasting accuracy at different horizons MAPE, MAE metrics are used. Diebold-Mariano tests were conducted to compare the forecast, confirming the superiority of deep learning methodologies. Overall, this study suggests that deep learning methodologies could provide a promising tool for forecasting Bitcoin returns (and therefore volatility), especially for short-term horizons.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-05T16:56:36Z
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
2023
2023-07-05T17:55:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28946
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28946
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1309-422X
10.1007/s40822-023-00232-0
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134713591365632