Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, H.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Cengiz, I. F., Silva, F. S., Reis, R. L., Oliveira, Joaquim M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66378
Resumo: Bone tissue has an astonishing self-healing capacity yet only for non-critical size defects (<6â mm) and clinical intervention is needed for critical-size defects and beyond that along with non-union bone fractures and bone defects larger than critical size represent a major healthcare problem. Autografts are, still, being used as preferred to treat large bone defects. Mostly, due to the presence of living differentiated and progenitor cells, its osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties that allow osteogenesis, vascularization, and provide structural support. Bone tissue engineering strategies have been proposed to overcome the limited supply of grafts. Complete and successful bone regeneration can be influenced by several factors namely: the age of the patient, health, gender and is expected that the ideal scaffold for bone regeneration combines factors such as bioactivity and osteoinductivity. The commercially available products have as their main function the replacement of bone. Moreover, scaffolds still present limitations including poor osteointegration and limited vascularization. The introduction of pores in scaffolds are being used to promote the osteointegration as it allows cell and vessel infiltration. Moreover, combinations with growth factors or coatings have been explored as they can improve the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of the scaffold. This review focuses on the bone defects treatments and on the research of scaffolds for bone regeneration. Moreover, it summarizes the latest progress in the development of coatings used in bone tissue engineering. Despite the interesting advances which include the development of hybrid scaffolds, there are still important challenges that need to be addressed in order to fasten translation of scaffolds into the clinical scenario. Finally, we must reflect on the main challenges for bone tissue regeneration. There is a need to achieve a proper mechanical properties to bear the load of movements; have a scaffolds with a structure that fit the bone anatomy.
id RCAP_692a295bbadb07a509aad822ee4fb427
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/66378
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone RegenerationboneCoatingScaffoldScience & TechnologyBone tissue has an astonishing self-healing capacity yet only for non-critical size defects (<6â mm) and clinical intervention is needed for critical-size defects and beyond that along with non-union bone fractures and bone defects larger than critical size represent a major healthcare problem. Autografts are, still, being used as preferred to treat large bone defects. Mostly, due to the presence of living differentiated and progenitor cells, its osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties that allow osteogenesis, vascularization, and provide structural support. Bone tissue engineering strategies have been proposed to overcome the limited supply of grafts. Complete and successful bone regeneration can be influenced by several factors namely: the age of the patient, health, gender and is expected that the ideal scaffold for bone regeneration combines factors such as bioactivity and osteoinductivity. The commercially available products have as their main function the replacement of bone. Moreover, scaffolds still present limitations including poor osteointegration and limited vascularization. The introduction of pores in scaffolds are being used to promote the osteointegration as it allows cell and vessel infiltration. Moreover, combinations with growth factors or coatings have been explored as they can improve the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of the scaffold. This review focuses on the bone defects treatments and on the research of scaffolds for bone regeneration. Moreover, it summarizes the latest progress in the development of coatings used in bone tissue engineering. Despite the interesting advances which include the development of hybrid scaffolds, there are still important challenges that need to be addressed in order to fasten translation of scaffolds into the clinical scenario. Finally, we must reflect on the main challenges for bone tissue regeneration. There is a need to achieve a proper mechanical properties to bear the load of movements; have a scaffolds with a structure that fit the bone anatomy.This article is a result of the project FROnTHERA(NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000023), supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the POR-TUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European RegionalDevelopment Fund (ERDF) and is supported by Portuguese Founda-tion for Science and Technology in the scope of the projects UID/EEA/04436/2013 and NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000018-HAMaBICo. JMOthanks the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)for the funds provided under the program Investigador FCT 2015 (IF/01285/2015).SpringerUniversidade do MinhoPereira, H.Cengiz, I. F.Silva, F. S.Reis, R. L.Oliveira, Joaquim M.2020-022020-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/66378engPereira H., Cengiz I. F., Silva F. S., Reis R. L., Oliveira J. M. Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, Vol. 31, pp. 27, doi:10.1007/s10856-020-06364-y, 20201573-483810.1007/s10856-020-06364-y32124052https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06364-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:41:47ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration
title Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration
spellingShingle Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration
Pereira, H.
bone
Coating
Scaffold
Science & Technology
title_short Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration
title_full Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration
title_sort Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration
author Pereira, H.
author_facet Pereira, H.
Cengiz, I. F.
Silva, F. S.
Reis, R. L.
Oliveira, Joaquim M.
author_role author
author2 Cengiz, I. F.
Silva, F. S.
Reis, R. L.
Oliveira, Joaquim M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, H.
Cengiz, I. F.
Silva, F. S.
Reis, R. L.
Oliveira, Joaquim M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bone
Coating
Scaffold
Science & Technology
topic bone
Coating
Scaffold
Science & Technology
description Bone tissue has an astonishing self-healing capacity yet only for non-critical size defects (<6â mm) and clinical intervention is needed for critical-size defects and beyond that along with non-union bone fractures and bone defects larger than critical size represent a major healthcare problem. Autografts are, still, being used as preferred to treat large bone defects. Mostly, due to the presence of living differentiated and progenitor cells, its osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties that allow osteogenesis, vascularization, and provide structural support. Bone tissue engineering strategies have been proposed to overcome the limited supply of grafts. Complete and successful bone regeneration can be influenced by several factors namely: the age of the patient, health, gender and is expected that the ideal scaffold for bone regeneration combines factors such as bioactivity and osteoinductivity. The commercially available products have as their main function the replacement of bone. Moreover, scaffolds still present limitations including poor osteointegration and limited vascularization. The introduction of pores in scaffolds are being used to promote the osteointegration as it allows cell and vessel infiltration. Moreover, combinations with growth factors or coatings have been explored as they can improve the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of the scaffold. This review focuses on the bone defects treatments and on the research of scaffolds for bone regeneration. Moreover, it summarizes the latest progress in the development of coatings used in bone tissue engineering. Despite the interesting advances which include the development of hybrid scaffolds, there are still important challenges that need to be addressed in order to fasten translation of scaffolds into the clinical scenario. Finally, we must reflect on the main challenges for bone tissue regeneration. There is a need to achieve a proper mechanical properties to bear the load of movements; have a scaffolds with a structure that fit the bone anatomy.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02
2020-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66378
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/66378
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Pereira H., Cengiz I. F., Silva F. S., Reis R. L., Oliveira J. M. Scaffolds and Coatings for Bone Regeneration, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, Vol. 31, pp. 27, doi:10.1007/s10856-020-06364-y, 2020
1573-4838
10.1007/s10856-020-06364-y
32124052
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06364-y
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777303820671385600