Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Alberto J.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Curi, Denise, Bandeira, Ana Maria, Ferreira, Augusta, Tomé, Brízida, Joaquim, Carla, Santos, Carlos, Góis, Cristina, Meira, Deolinda, Azevedo, Graça, Inácio, Helena, Jesus, Mafalda, Teixeira, Maria Goreti, Monteiro, Patrícia, Duarte, Ruben, Marques, Rui Pedro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34115
Resumo: The concept of sustainable development (SD) was introduced in the “Our Common Future” report, launched in 1987, which influenced the emergence of many studies related to the role played by organizations as actors supporting SD. SD is a consolidated concept; however, since 1987, many political, social, and natural events have occurred on our planet, which have impacted companies’ behaviors. However, the diversity of research from different fields has provoked, among the academic community, a lack of clarity surrounding “sustainability” (S), “corporate sustainability” (CS) and “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) concepts. This lack of clarity can also be identified in companies, which have referred to “sustainability” only in the environmental field. Recently, increased discussions related to corporate sustainability metrics have shed light on the ESG criteria (environmental, social, and governance), increasing misperceptions associated with the concept. Ambiguous definitions and constructs may prevent managers from identifying sustainability goals for their companies. Therefore, literature reviews as a research method are more relevant than ever. Thus, in this work, we aim to answer the following question: How should we integrate different perspectives on corporate sustainability, in order to broaden the understanding of the concept? In this study, we conducted a focused bibliographic review and revisited the papers that most influenced the construction of the concepts. The information in this paper is helpful to improve the understanding of CS; to provide specific insights into the studies that have investigated this field; to help managers and entrepreneurs who are improving CS actions in their companies; and to support academia by putting together a large amount of information about this theme in one paper.
id RCAP_6a41096c6fcfe3b93bc80f560f998e77
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/34115
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructsSustainable developmentCorporate sustainabilityESGCorporate social responsibilityThe concept of sustainable development (SD) was introduced in the “Our Common Future” report, launched in 1987, which influenced the emergence of many studies related to the role played by organizations as actors supporting SD. SD is a consolidated concept; however, since 1987, many political, social, and natural events have occurred on our planet, which have impacted companies’ behaviors. However, the diversity of research from different fields has provoked, among the academic community, a lack of clarity surrounding “sustainability” (S), “corporate sustainability” (CS) and “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) concepts. This lack of clarity can also be identified in companies, which have referred to “sustainability” only in the environmental field. Recently, increased discussions related to corporate sustainability metrics have shed light on the ESG criteria (environmental, social, and governance), increasing misperceptions associated with the concept. Ambiguous definitions and constructs may prevent managers from identifying sustainability goals for their companies. Therefore, literature reviews as a research method are more relevant than ever. Thus, in this work, we aim to answer the following question: How should we integrate different perspectives on corporate sustainability, in order to broaden the understanding of the concept? In this study, we conducted a focused bibliographic review and revisited the papers that most influenced the construction of the concepts. The information in this paper is helpful to improve the understanding of CS; to provide specific insights into the studies that have investigated this field; to help managers and entrepreneurs who are improving CS actions in their companies; and to support academia by putting together a large amount of information about this theme in one paper.MDPI2022-07-05T16:29:44Z2022-04-07T00:00:00Z2022-04-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/34115eng10.3390/su14084413Costa, Alberto J.Curi, DeniseBandeira, Ana MariaFerreira, AugustaTomé, BrízidaJoaquim, CarlaSantos, CarlosGóis, CristinaMeira, DeolindaAzevedo, GraçaInácio, HelenaJesus, MafaldaTeixeira, Maria GoretiMonteiro, PatríciaDuarte, RubenMarques, Rui Pedroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:04:46Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/34115Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:05:02.541252Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
title Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
spellingShingle Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
Costa, Alberto J.
Sustainable development
Corporate sustainability
ESG
Corporate social responsibility
title_short Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
title_full Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
title_fullStr Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
title_full_unstemmed Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
title_sort Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
author Costa, Alberto J.
author_facet Costa, Alberto J.
Curi, Denise
Bandeira, Ana Maria
Ferreira, Augusta
Tomé, Brízida
Joaquim, Carla
Santos, Carlos
Góis, Cristina
Meira, Deolinda
Azevedo, Graça
Inácio, Helena
Jesus, Mafalda
Teixeira, Maria Goreti
Monteiro, Patrícia
Duarte, Ruben
Marques, Rui Pedro
author_role author
author2 Curi, Denise
Bandeira, Ana Maria
Ferreira, Augusta
Tomé, Brízida
Joaquim, Carla
Santos, Carlos
Góis, Cristina
Meira, Deolinda
Azevedo, Graça
Inácio, Helena
Jesus, Mafalda
Teixeira, Maria Goreti
Monteiro, Patrícia
Duarte, Ruben
Marques, Rui Pedro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Alberto J.
Curi, Denise
Bandeira, Ana Maria
Ferreira, Augusta
Tomé, Brízida
Joaquim, Carla
Santos, Carlos
Góis, Cristina
Meira, Deolinda
Azevedo, Graça
Inácio, Helena
Jesus, Mafalda
Teixeira, Maria Goreti
Monteiro, Patrícia
Duarte, Ruben
Marques, Rui Pedro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sustainable development
Corporate sustainability
ESG
Corporate social responsibility
topic Sustainable development
Corporate sustainability
ESG
Corporate social responsibility
description The concept of sustainable development (SD) was introduced in the “Our Common Future” report, launched in 1987, which influenced the emergence of many studies related to the role played by organizations as actors supporting SD. SD is a consolidated concept; however, since 1987, many political, social, and natural events have occurred on our planet, which have impacted companies’ behaviors. However, the diversity of research from different fields has provoked, among the academic community, a lack of clarity surrounding “sustainability” (S), “corporate sustainability” (CS) and “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) concepts. This lack of clarity can also be identified in companies, which have referred to “sustainability” only in the environmental field. Recently, increased discussions related to corporate sustainability metrics have shed light on the ESG criteria (environmental, social, and governance), increasing misperceptions associated with the concept. Ambiguous definitions and constructs may prevent managers from identifying sustainability goals for their companies. Therefore, literature reviews as a research method are more relevant than ever. Thus, in this work, we aim to answer the following question: How should we integrate different perspectives on corporate sustainability, in order to broaden the understanding of the concept? In this study, we conducted a focused bibliographic review and revisited the papers that most influenced the construction of the concepts. The information in this paper is helpful to improve the understanding of CS; to provide specific insights into the studies that have investigated this field; to help managers and entrepreneurs who are improving CS actions in their companies; and to support academia by putting together a large amount of information about this theme in one paper.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-05T16:29:44Z
2022-04-07T00:00:00Z
2022-04-07
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34115
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34115
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.3390/su14084413
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137705653698560