Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34115 |
Resumo: | The concept of sustainable development (SD) was introduced in the “Our Common Future” report, launched in 1987, which influenced the emergence of many studies related to the role played by organizations as actors supporting SD. SD is a consolidated concept; however, since 1987, many political, social, and natural events have occurred on our planet, which have impacted companies’ behaviors. However, the diversity of research from different fields has provoked, among the academic community, a lack of clarity surrounding “sustainability” (S), “corporate sustainability” (CS) and “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) concepts. This lack of clarity can also be identified in companies, which have referred to “sustainability” only in the environmental field. Recently, increased discussions related to corporate sustainability metrics have shed light on the ESG criteria (environmental, social, and governance), increasing misperceptions associated with the concept. Ambiguous definitions and constructs may prevent managers from identifying sustainability goals for their companies. Therefore, literature reviews as a research method are more relevant than ever. Thus, in this work, we aim to answer the following question: How should we integrate different perspectives on corporate sustainability, in order to broaden the understanding of the concept? In this study, we conducted a focused bibliographic review and revisited the papers that most influenced the construction of the concepts. The information in this paper is helpful to improve the understanding of CS; to provide specific insights into the studies that have investigated this field; to help managers and entrepreneurs who are improving CS actions in their companies; and to support academia by putting together a large amount of information about this theme in one paper. |
id |
RCAP_6a41096c6fcfe3b93bc80f560f998e77 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/34115 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructsSustainable developmentCorporate sustainabilityESGCorporate social responsibilityThe concept of sustainable development (SD) was introduced in the “Our Common Future” report, launched in 1987, which influenced the emergence of many studies related to the role played by organizations as actors supporting SD. SD is a consolidated concept; however, since 1987, many political, social, and natural events have occurred on our planet, which have impacted companies’ behaviors. However, the diversity of research from different fields has provoked, among the academic community, a lack of clarity surrounding “sustainability” (S), “corporate sustainability” (CS) and “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) concepts. This lack of clarity can also be identified in companies, which have referred to “sustainability” only in the environmental field. Recently, increased discussions related to corporate sustainability metrics have shed light on the ESG criteria (environmental, social, and governance), increasing misperceptions associated with the concept. Ambiguous definitions and constructs may prevent managers from identifying sustainability goals for their companies. Therefore, literature reviews as a research method are more relevant than ever. Thus, in this work, we aim to answer the following question: How should we integrate different perspectives on corporate sustainability, in order to broaden the understanding of the concept? In this study, we conducted a focused bibliographic review and revisited the papers that most influenced the construction of the concepts. The information in this paper is helpful to improve the understanding of CS; to provide specific insights into the studies that have investigated this field; to help managers and entrepreneurs who are improving CS actions in their companies; and to support academia by putting together a large amount of information about this theme in one paper.MDPI2022-07-05T16:29:44Z2022-04-07T00:00:00Z2022-04-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/34115eng10.3390/su14084413Costa, Alberto J.Curi, DeniseBandeira, Ana MariaFerreira, AugustaTomé, BrízidaJoaquim, CarlaSantos, CarlosGóis, CristinaMeira, DeolindaAzevedo, GraçaInácio, HelenaJesus, MafaldaTeixeira, Maria GoretiMonteiro, PatríciaDuarte, RubenMarques, Rui Pedroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T04:36:57Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/34115Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-06T04:36:57Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs |
title |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs |
spellingShingle |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs Costa, Alberto J. Sustainable development Corporate sustainability ESG Corporate social responsibility |
title_short |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs |
title_full |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs |
title_fullStr |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs |
title_sort |
Literature review and theoretical framework of the evolution and interconnectedness of corporate sustainability constructs |
author |
Costa, Alberto J. |
author_facet |
Costa, Alberto J. Curi, Denise Bandeira, Ana Maria Ferreira, Augusta Tomé, Brízida Joaquim, Carla Santos, Carlos Góis, Cristina Meira, Deolinda Azevedo, Graça Inácio, Helena Jesus, Mafalda Teixeira, Maria Goreti Monteiro, Patrícia Duarte, Ruben Marques, Rui Pedro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Curi, Denise Bandeira, Ana Maria Ferreira, Augusta Tomé, Brízida Joaquim, Carla Santos, Carlos Góis, Cristina Meira, Deolinda Azevedo, Graça Inácio, Helena Jesus, Mafalda Teixeira, Maria Goreti Monteiro, Patrícia Duarte, Ruben Marques, Rui Pedro |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Alberto J. Curi, Denise Bandeira, Ana Maria Ferreira, Augusta Tomé, Brízida Joaquim, Carla Santos, Carlos Góis, Cristina Meira, Deolinda Azevedo, Graça Inácio, Helena Jesus, Mafalda Teixeira, Maria Goreti Monteiro, Patrícia Duarte, Ruben Marques, Rui Pedro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sustainable development Corporate sustainability ESG Corporate social responsibility |
topic |
Sustainable development Corporate sustainability ESG Corporate social responsibility |
description |
The concept of sustainable development (SD) was introduced in the “Our Common Future” report, launched in 1987, which influenced the emergence of many studies related to the role played by organizations as actors supporting SD. SD is a consolidated concept; however, since 1987, many political, social, and natural events have occurred on our planet, which have impacted companies’ behaviors. However, the diversity of research from different fields has provoked, among the academic community, a lack of clarity surrounding “sustainability” (S), “corporate sustainability” (CS) and “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) concepts. This lack of clarity can also be identified in companies, which have referred to “sustainability” only in the environmental field. Recently, increased discussions related to corporate sustainability metrics have shed light on the ESG criteria (environmental, social, and governance), increasing misperceptions associated with the concept. Ambiguous definitions and constructs may prevent managers from identifying sustainability goals for their companies. Therefore, literature reviews as a research method are more relevant than ever. Thus, in this work, we aim to answer the following question: How should we integrate different perspectives on corporate sustainability, in order to broaden the understanding of the concept? In this study, we conducted a focused bibliographic review and revisited the papers that most influenced the construction of the concepts. The information in this paper is helpful to improve the understanding of CS; to provide specific insights into the studies that have investigated this field; to help managers and entrepreneurs who are improving CS actions in their companies; and to support academia by putting together a large amount of information about this theme in one paper. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-05T16:29:44Z 2022-04-07T00:00:00Z 2022-04-07 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34115 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34115 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.3390/su14084413 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817543808011730944 |