Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meier, J
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Filipescu, D, Kozek-Langenecker, S, Llau Pitarch, J, Mallett, S, Martus, P, Matot, I, ETPOS collaborators
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2957
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Transfusion of allogeneic blood influences outcome after surgery. Despite widespread availability of transfusion guidelines, transfusion practices might vary among physicians, departments, hospitals and countries. Our aim was to determine the amount of packed red blood cells (pRBC) and blood products transfused intraoperatively, and to describe factors determining transfusion throughout Europe. METHODS: We did a prospective observational cohort study enrolling 5803 patients in 126 European centres that received at least one pRBC unit intraoperatively, during a continuous three month period in 2013. RESULTS: The overall intraoperative transfusion rate was 1.8%; 59% of transfusions were at least partially initiated as a result of a physiological transfusion trigger- mostly because of hypotension (55.4%) and/or tachycardia (30.7%). Haemoglobin (Hb)- based transfusion trigger alone initiated only 8.5% of transfusions. The Hb concentration [mean (sd)] just before transfusion was 8.1 (1.7) g dl(-1) and increased to 9.8 (1.8) g dl(-1) after transfusion. The mean number of intraoperatively transfused pRBC units was 2.5 (2.7) units (median 2). CONCLUSION: Although European Society of Anaesthesiology transfusion guidelines are moderately implemented in Europe with respect to Hb threshold for transfusion (7-9 g dl(-1)), there is still an urgent need for further educational efforts that focus on the number of pRBC units to be transfused at this threshold.
id RCAP_6a470054c1e8426ed215935b2a873732
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/2957
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in EuropeBlood TransfusionCohort StudiesEuropeFemaleHospitalsHumansIntraoperative CareMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesCHLC ANSBACKGROUND: Transfusion of allogeneic blood influences outcome after surgery. Despite widespread availability of transfusion guidelines, transfusion practices might vary among physicians, departments, hospitals and countries. Our aim was to determine the amount of packed red blood cells (pRBC) and blood products transfused intraoperatively, and to describe factors determining transfusion throughout Europe. METHODS: We did a prospective observational cohort study enrolling 5803 patients in 126 European centres that received at least one pRBC unit intraoperatively, during a continuous three month period in 2013. RESULTS: The overall intraoperative transfusion rate was 1.8%; 59% of transfusions were at least partially initiated as a result of a physiological transfusion trigger- mostly because of hypotension (55.4%) and/or tachycardia (30.7%). Haemoglobin (Hb)- based transfusion trigger alone initiated only 8.5% of transfusions. The Hb concentration [mean (sd)] just before transfusion was 8.1 (1.7) g dl(-1) and increased to 9.8 (1.8) g dl(-1) after transfusion. The mean number of intraoperatively transfused pRBC units was 2.5 (2.7) units (median 2). CONCLUSION: Although European Society of Anaesthesiology transfusion guidelines are moderately implemented in Europe with respect to Hb threshold for transfusion (7-9 g dl(-1)), there is still an urgent need for further educational efforts that focus on the number of pRBC units to be transfused at this threshold.ElsevierRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEMeier, JFilipescu, DKozek-Langenecker, SLlau Pitarch, JMallett, SMartus, PMatot, IETPOS collaborators2018-03-15T16:00:59Z2016-022016-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2957engBr J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):255-6110.1093/bja/aev456info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:40:30Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/2957Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:20:16.628056Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe
title Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe
spellingShingle Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe
Meier, J
Blood Transfusion
Cohort Studies
Europe
Female
Hospitals
Humans
Intraoperative Care
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
CHLC ANS
title_short Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe
title_full Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe
title_fullStr Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe
title_sort Intraoperative Transfusion Practices in Europe
author Meier, J
author_facet Meier, J
Filipescu, D
Kozek-Langenecker, S
Llau Pitarch, J
Mallett, S
Martus, P
Matot, I
ETPOS collaborators
author_role author
author2 Filipescu, D
Kozek-Langenecker, S
Llau Pitarch, J
Mallett, S
Martus, P
Matot, I
ETPOS collaborators
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meier, J
Filipescu, D
Kozek-Langenecker, S
Llau Pitarch, J
Mallett, S
Martus, P
Matot, I
ETPOS collaborators
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Blood Transfusion
Cohort Studies
Europe
Female
Hospitals
Humans
Intraoperative Care
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
CHLC ANS
topic Blood Transfusion
Cohort Studies
Europe
Female
Hospitals
Humans
Intraoperative Care
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
CHLC ANS
description BACKGROUND: Transfusion of allogeneic blood influences outcome after surgery. Despite widespread availability of transfusion guidelines, transfusion practices might vary among physicians, departments, hospitals and countries. Our aim was to determine the amount of packed red blood cells (pRBC) and blood products transfused intraoperatively, and to describe factors determining transfusion throughout Europe. METHODS: We did a prospective observational cohort study enrolling 5803 patients in 126 European centres that received at least one pRBC unit intraoperatively, during a continuous three month period in 2013. RESULTS: The overall intraoperative transfusion rate was 1.8%; 59% of transfusions were at least partially initiated as a result of a physiological transfusion trigger- mostly because of hypotension (55.4%) and/or tachycardia (30.7%). Haemoglobin (Hb)- based transfusion trigger alone initiated only 8.5% of transfusions. The Hb concentration [mean (sd)] just before transfusion was 8.1 (1.7) g dl(-1) and increased to 9.8 (1.8) g dl(-1) after transfusion. The mean number of intraoperatively transfused pRBC units was 2.5 (2.7) units (median 2). CONCLUSION: Although European Society of Anaesthesiology transfusion guidelines are moderately implemented in Europe with respect to Hb threshold for transfusion (7-9 g dl(-1)), there is still an urgent need for further educational efforts that focus on the number of pRBC units to be transfused at this threshold.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02
2016-02-01T00:00:00Z
2018-03-15T16:00:59Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2957
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2957
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):255-61
10.1093/bja/aev456
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131298800861184