Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Chronic pain is a very debilitating and underestimated condition, affecting patients’ quality of life. Its prevalence is around 20% in adult European population and about 36.7% in Portugal adult population. Neuropathic pain represents about 7% - 8% of all chronic pain conditions in Europe and accounts for more depression, anxiety and sleep disorders than any other type of pain. For this reason, chronic neuropathic pain is now considered as a common public health problem with a major impact on health related costs.Objectives: To understand patients’ satisfaction regarding topical treatment with lidocaine patches in some clinical conditions of neuropathic localized chronic pain.Methods: A telephone survey of 6 questions specifically designed for this study was applied to all the patients followed in consultation for chronic neuropathic pain to whom lidocaine patches were recommended. This retrospective study took place in Hospital de Braga, at the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Service, between December 2015 and December 2016.Results: Fifty two patients in such conditions were identified, but only 31 were included (27 women and 4 men). Four groups were then formed, according to diagnosis or consultation purpose: Pain after surgical intervention (n=21), peripheral canal syndromes (n=3), post-herpetic neuralgia (n=1) and Morton neuroma (n=6). Twenty four patients (77%) were satisfied with the recommended treatment with lidocaine patches, with post-herpetic neuralgia attending for the biggest score for pain relief (50%), followed by pain after surgical intervention group (47% in pain relief). Eighteen out of 31 patients also tried other therapeutic options, including pharmacological or physiotherapy.Conclusion: Despite some limitations of this study, such as small simple size and heterogeneity between the groups, most of the patients felt satisfied with lidocaine patches treatment. This study enhances the potential of using lidocaine patches in different contexts of localized neuropathic pain other than Post-herpetic Neuralgia. The authors suggest, however, the need for more clinical studies to sustainably propose treatment with lidocaine patches in localized neuropathic pain. |
id |
RCAP_6beb73ff9e690e2e395fa2bb52b11511 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our ExperienceEmplastro de Lidocaína como Tratamento na Dor Neuropática: A Nossa ExperiênciaLidocaine; Neuralgia/drug therapy; Transdermal PatchEmplastro Transdérmico; Lidocaína; Neuralgia/tratamentoIntroduction: Chronic pain is a very debilitating and underestimated condition, affecting patients’ quality of life. Its prevalence is around 20% in adult European population and about 36.7% in Portugal adult population. Neuropathic pain represents about 7% - 8% of all chronic pain conditions in Europe and accounts for more depression, anxiety and sleep disorders than any other type of pain. For this reason, chronic neuropathic pain is now considered as a common public health problem with a major impact on health related costs.Objectives: To understand patients’ satisfaction regarding topical treatment with lidocaine patches in some clinical conditions of neuropathic localized chronic pain.Methods: A telephone survey of 6 questions specifically designed for this study was applied to all the patients followed in consultation for chronic neuropathic pain to whom lidocaine patches were recommended. This retrospective study took place in Hospital de Braga, at the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Service, between December 2015 and December 2016.Results: Fifty two patients in such conditions were identified, but only 31 were included (27 women and 4 men). Four groups were then formed, according to diagnosis or consultation purpose: Pain after surgical intervention (n=21), peripheral canal syndromes (n=3), post-herpetic neuralgia (n=1) and Morton neuroma (n=6). Twenty four patients (77%) were satisfied with the recommended treatment with lidocaine patches, with post-herpetic neuralgia attending for the biggest score for pain relief (50%), followed by pain after surgical intervention group (47% in pain relief). Eighteen out of 31 patients also tried other therapeutic options, including pharmacological or physiotherapy.Conclusion: Despite some limitations of this study, such as small simple size and heterogeneity between the groups, most of the patients felt satisfied with lidocaine patches treatment. This study enhances the potential of using lidocaine patches in different contexts of localized neuropathic pain other than Post-herpetic Neuralgia. The authors suggest, however, the need for more clinical studies to sustainably propose treatment with lidocaine patches in localized neuropathic pain.introdução: A dor crónica é um problema complexo que afeta o indivíduo e a sua qualidade de vida. O seu impacto ainda é pouco conhecido, mas estima-se que atinja cerca de 20% da população adulta em toda a Europa e 36,7% da população adulta em Portugal. A dor neuropática, prevalente em cerca de 7% - 8% dos doentes com dor crónica na Europa, é uma das suas formas de manifestação. Comorbilidades como depressão, ansiedade e distúrbios do sono surgem mais associados a este tipo de dor do que a qualquer outro. A dor neuropática é por isso um problema de saúde pública com grande impacto nos custos relacionados com a saúde.Objetivos: Perceber o grau de satisfação dos doentes relativamente ao tratamento tópico com emplastros de lidocaína no que concerne ao tratamento de alguns quadros de dor neuropática localizada.Material e Métodos: Foi aplicado um inquérito telefónico a todos os doentes seguidos em consulta de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação (MFR) do Hospital de Braga (HB) com dor neuropática de evolução crónica e a quem foi prescrito tratamento com emplastro de lidocaína entre Dezembro de 2015 e Dezembro de 2016.Resultados: Dos 52 doentes que cumpriam os critérios, 31 foram incluídos (27 mulheres e 4 homens). Foram divididos consoante o diagnóstico/motivo de consulta nos seguintes grupos: Dor após intervenção cirúrgica (n=21); síndromes canalares periféricas (n=3); nevralgia pós-herpética (n=1) e nevroma de Morton (n=6). Vinte e quatro doentes (77%) referiram melhoria com o tratamento prescrito, sendo esta mais marcada no doente com nevralgia pós-herpética (50% de melhoria), seguido do grupo Dor após intervenção cirúrgica (47% de melhoria). Dezoito doentes (58%) realizaram ainda outros tratamentos (farmacológicos e não farmacológicos) para a dor que apresentavam.Conclusão: Apesar das limitações do estudo, de que se salienta amostragem pequena e heterogeneidade dos grupos, a maioria dos doentes mostrou-se satisfeita com o tratamento prescrito. O trabalho permitiu constatar o potencial de utilização deste fármaco em diferentes contextos de dor neuropática localizada, muito frequentes na prática clínica de MFR. Os autores sugerem, contudo, a necessidade de mais estudos clínicos para propor de forma sustentada o tratamento com emplastro de lidocaína na dor neuropática localizada.Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação2019-01-04T00:00:00Zjournal articlejournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação; v. 30, n. 3 (2018): Ano 26; 83-900872-9204reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/245https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/245/160Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, PortugalAntunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal2022-09-20T15:28:39Zoai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:51:15.468464Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience Emplastro de Lidocaína como Tratamento na Dor Neuropática: A Nossa Experiência |
title |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience |
spellingShingle |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal Lidocaine; Neuralgia/drug therapy; Transdermal Patch Emplastro Transdérmico; Lidocaína; Neuralgia/tratamento |
title_short |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience |
title_full |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience |
title_fullStr |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience |
title_sort |
Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience |
author |
Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal |
author_facet |
Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal Antunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Antunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal Antunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lidocaine; Neuralgia/drug therapy; Transdermal Patch Emplastro Transdérmico; Lidocaína; Neuralgia/tratamento |
topic |
Lidocaine; Neuralgia/drug therapy; Transdermal Patch Emplastro Transdérmico; Lidocaína; Neuralgia/tratamento |
description |
Introduction: Chronic pain is a very debilitating and underestimated condition, affecting patients’ quality of life. Its prevalence is around 20% in adult European population and about 36.7% in Portugal adult population. Neuropathic pain represents about 7% - 8% of all chronic pain conditions in Europe and accounts for more depression, anxiety and sleep disorders than any other type of pain. For this reason, chronic neuropathic pain is now considered as a common public health problem with a major impact on health related costs.Objectives: To understand patients’ satisfaction regarding topical treatment with lidocaine patches in some clinical conditions of neuropathic localized chronic pain.Methods: A telephone survey of 6 questions specifically designed for this study was applied to all the patients followed in consultation for chronic neuropathic pain to whom lidocaine patches were recommended. This retrospective study took place in Hospital de Braga, at the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Service, between December 2015 and December 2016.Results: Fifty two patients in such conditions were identified, but only 31 were included (27 women and 4 men). Four groups were then formed, according to diagnosis or consultation purpose: Pain after surgical intervention (n=21), peripheral canal syndromes (n=3), post-herpetic neuralgia (n=1) and Morton neuroma (n=6). Twenty four patients (77%) were satisfied with the recommended treatment with lidocaine patches, with post-herpetic neuralgia attending for the biggest score for pain relief (50%), followed by pain after surgical intervention group (47% in pain relief). Eighteen out of 31 patients also tried other therapeutic options, including pharmacological or physiotherapy.Conclusion: Despite some limitations of this study, such as small simple size and heterogeneity between the groups, most of the patients felt satisfied with lidocaine patches treatment. This study enhances the potential of using lidocaine patches in different contexts of localized neuropathic pain other than Post-herpetic Neuralgia. The authors suggest, however, the need for more clinical studies to sustainably propose treatment with lidocaine patches in localized neuropathic pain. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-04T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245 oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/245 https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245 https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/245/160 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação; v. 30, n. 3 (2018): Ano 26; 83-90 0872-9204 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817554058624368640 |