Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Antunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245
Resumo: Introduction: Chronic pain is a very debilitating and underestimated condition, affecting patients’ quality of life. Its prevalence is around 20% in adult European population and about 36.7% in Portugal adult population. Neuropathic pain represents about 7% - 8% of all chronic pain conditions in Europe and accounts for more depression, anxiety and sleep disorders than any other type of pain. For this reason, chronic neuropathic pain is now considered as a common public health problem with a major impact on health related costs.Objectives: To understand patients’ satisfaction regarding topical treatment with lidocaine patches in some clinical conditions of neuropathic localized chronic pain.Methods: A telephone survey of 6 questions specifically designed for this study was applied to all the patients followed in consultation for chronic neuropathic pain to whom lidocaine patches were recommended. This retrospective study took place in Hospital de Braga, at the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Service, between December 2015 and December 2016.Results: Fifty two patients in such conditions were identified, but only 31 were included (27 women and 4 men). Four groups were then formed, according to diagnosis or consultation purpose: Pain after surgical intervention (n=21), peripheral canal syndromes (n=3), post-herpetic neuralgia (n=1) and Morton neuroma (n=6). Twenty four patients (77%) were satisfied with the recommended treatment with lidocaine patches, with post-herpetic neuralgia attending for the biggest score for pain relief (50%), followed by pain after surgical intervention group (47% in pain relief). Eighteen out of 31 patients also tried other therapeutic options, including pharmacological or physiotherapy.Conclusion: Despite some limitations of this study, such as small simple size and heterogeneity between the groups, most of the patients felt satisfied with lidocaine patches treatment. This study enhances the potential of using lidocaine patches in different contexts of localized neuropathic pain other than Post-herpetic Neuralgia. The authors suggest, however, the need for more clinical studies to sustainably propose treatment with lidocaine patches in localized neuropathic pain.
id RCAP_6beb73ff9e690e2e395fa2bb52b11511
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our ExperienceEmplastro de Lidocaína como Tratamento na Dor Neuropática: A Nossa ExperiênciaLidocaine; Neuralgia/drug therapy; Transdermal PatchEmplastro Transdérmico; Lidocaína; Neuralgia/tratamentoIntroduction: Chronic pain is a very debilitating and underestimated condition, affecting patients’ quality of life. Its prevalence is around 20% in adult European population and about 36.7% in Portugal adult population. Neuropathic pain represents about 7% - 8% of all chronic pain conditions in Europe and accounts for more depression, anxiety and sleep disorders than any other type of pain. For this reason, chronic neuropathic pain is now considered as a common public health problem with a major impact on health related costs.Objectives: To understand patients’ satisfaction regarding topical treatment with lidocaine patches in some clinical conditions of neuropathic localized chronic pain.Methods: A telephone survey of 6 questions specifically designed for this study was applied to all the patients followed in consultation for chronic neuropathic pain to whom lidocaine patches were recommended. This retrospective study took place in Hospital de Braga, at the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Service, between December 2015 and December 2016.Results: Fifty two patients in such conditions were identified, but only 31 were included (27 women and 4 men). Four groups were then formed, according to diagnosis or consultation purpose: Pain after surgical intervention (n=21), peripheral canal syndromes (n=3), post-herpetic neuralgia (n=1) and Morton neuroma (n=6). Twenty four patients (77%) were satisfied with the recommended treatment with lidocaine patches, with post-herpetic neuralgia attending for the biggest score for pain relief (50%), followed by pain after surgical intervention group (47% in pain relief). Eighteen out of 31 patients also tried other therapeutic options, including pharmacological or physiotherapy.Conclusion: Despite some limitations of this study, such as small simple size and heterogeneity between the groups, most of the patients felt satisfied with lidocaine patches treatment. This study enhances the potential of using lidocaine patches in different contexts of localized neuropathic pain other than Post-herpetic Neuralgia. The authors suggest, however, the need for more clinical studies to sustainably propose treatment with lidocaine patches in localized neuropathic pain.introdução: A dor crónica é um problema complexo que afeta o indivíduo e a sua qualidade de vida. O seu impacto ainda é pouco conhecido, mas estima-se que atinja cerca de 20% da população adulta em toda a Europa e 36,7% da população adulta em Portugal. A dor neuropática, prevalente em cerca de 7% - 8% dos doentes com dor crónica na Europa, é uma das suas formas de manifestação. Comorbilidades como depressão, ansiedade e distúrbios do sono surgem mais associados a este tipo de dor do que a qualquer outro. A dor neuropática é por isso um problema de saúde pública com grande impacto nos custos relacionados com a saúde.Objetivos: Perceber o grau de satisfação dos doentes relativamente ao tratamento tópico com emplastros de lidocaína no que concerne ao tratamento de alguns quadros de dor neuropática localizada.Material e Métodos: Foi aplicado um inquérito telefónico a todos os doentes seguidos em consulta de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação (MFR) do Hospital de Braga (HB) com dor neuropática de evolução crónica e a quem foi prescrito tratamento com emplastro de lidocaína entre Dezembro de 2015 e Dezembro de 2016.Resultados: Dos 52 doentes que cumpriam os critérios, 31 foram incluídos (27 mulheres e 4 homens). Foram divididos consoante o diagnóstico/motivo de consulta nos seguintes grupos: Dor após intervenção cirúrgica (n=21); síndromes canalares periféricas (n=3); nevralgia pós-herpética (n=1) e nevroma de Morton (n=6). Vinte e quatro doentes (77%) referiram melhoria com o tratamento prescrito, sendo esta mais marcada no doente com nevralgia pós-herpética (50% de melhoria), seguido do grupo Dor após intervenção cirúrgica (47% de melhoria). Dezoito doentes (58%) realizaram ainda outros tratamentos (farmacológicos e não farmacológicos) para a dor que apresentavam.Conclusão: Apesar das limitações do estudo, de que se salienta amostragem pequena e heterogeneidade dos grupos, a maioria dos doentes mostrou-se satisfeita com o tratamento prescrito. O trabalho permitiu constatar o potencial de utilização deste fármaco em diferentes contextos de dor neuropática localizada, muito frequentes na prática clínica de MFR. Os autores sugerem, contudo, a necessidade de mais estudos clínicos para propor de forma sustentada o tratamento com emplastro de lidocaína na dor neuropática localizada.Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação2019-01-04T00:00:00Zjournal articlejournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação; v. 30, n. 3 (2018): Ano 26; 83-900872-9204reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/245https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/245/160Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, PortugalAntunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal2022-09-20T15:28:39Zoai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:51:15.468464Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
Emplastro de Lidocaína como Tratamento na Dor Neuropática: A Nossa Experiência
title Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
spellingShingle Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
Lidocaine; Neuralgia/drug therapy; Transdermal Patch
Emplastro Transdérmico; Lidocaína; Neuralgia/tratamento
title_short Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
title_full Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
title_fullStr Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
title_full_unstemmed Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
title_sort Lidocaine Patch as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain: Our Experience
author Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
author_facet Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
Antunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
author_role author
author2 Antunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gemelgo, Cláudia; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
Antunes, Filipe; Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lidocaine; Neuralgia/drug therapy; Transdermal Patch
Emplastro Transdérmico; Lidocaína; Neuralgia/tratamento
topic Lidocaine; Neuralgia/drug therapy; Transdermal Patch
Emplastro Transdérmico; Lidocaína; Neuralgia/tratamento
description Introduction: Chronic pain is a very debilitating and underestimated condition, affecting patients’ quality of life. Its prevalence is around 20% in adult European population and about 36.7% in Portugal adult population. Neuropathic pain represents about 7% - 8% of all chronic pain conditions in Europe and accounts for more depression, anxiety and sleep disorders than any other type of pain. For this reason, chronic neuropathic pain is now considered as a common public health problem with a major impact on health related costs.Objectives: To understand patients’ satisfaction regarding topical treatment with lidocaine patches in some clinical conditions of neuropathic localized chronic pain.Methods: A telephone survey of 6 questions specifically designed for this study was applied to all the patients followed in consultation for chronic neuropathic pain to whom lidocaine patches were recommended. This retrospective study took place in Hospital de Braga, at the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Service, between December 2015 and December 2016.Results: Fifty two patients in such conditions were identified, but only 31 were included (27 women and 4 men). Four groups were then formed, according to diagnosis or consultation purpose: Pain after surgical intervention (n=21), peripheral canal syndromes (n=3), post-herpetic neuralgia (n=1) and Morton neuroma (n=6). Twenty four patients (77%) were satisfied with the recommended treatment with lidocaine patches, with post-herpetic neuralgia attending for the biggest score for pain relief (50%), followed by pain after surgical intervention group (47% in pain relief). Eighteen out of 31 patients also tried other therapeutic options, including pharmacological or physiotherapy.Conclusion: Despite some limitations of this study, such as small simple size and heterogeneity between the groups, most of the patients felt satisfied with lidocaine patches treatment. This study enhances the potential of using lidocaine patches in different contexts of localized neuropathic pain other than Post-herpetic Neuralgia. The authors suggest, however, the need for more clinical studies to sustainably propose treatment with lidocaine patches in localized neuropathic pain.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-04T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245
oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245
url https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.spmfrjournal.org:article/245
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/245
https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.245
https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/245/160
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação; v. 30, n. 3 (2018): Ano 26; 83-90
0872-9204
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130376318222336