Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/75181 |
Resumo: | Purpose - This study aims to investigate the performance of fundamental weighted portfolios (using sales, cash flows, dividends, book values and a composite of all these variables), an equal weighted portfolio and a smoothed cap-weighted (CW) portfolio in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) markets. The performance of these portfolios is compared with that of a CWportfolio for the period 2005 to 2015.Design/methodology/approach - The portfolios are formed using different concentration levels, different construction schemes and different sub-regions. The performance is assessed using a large set of risk-adjusted performance measures, including more robust measures in the context of multi-factor models, such as the Fama and French (1993) three-factor model, the Fama and French (2015) five-factormodel and a seven-factor model.Findings - The results show that the fundamental portfolios, with the exception of the sales portfolio, underperform the CW portfolio using either the traditional or more robust risk-adjusted performance measures. The underperformance of the fundamental portfolios is found to be robust using different concentration levels, different construction schemes and different sub-regions. The results also show that the equal weighted portfolio outperforms the CW portfolio using traditional risk-adjusted measures. However, after controlling for additional risk factors, this outperformance disappears.Practical implications - The failure of fundamental indexation in the emerging markets could help the researchers and the academics to search for the best weighting method that could be used as an alternative to theCW indexation method.Originality/value - The results of the study add evidence to the debatable propositions on the performance of fundamental portfolios in emerging markets. Furthermore, the findings may help domestic and international investors, practitioners and decision-makers to deepen their knowledge in terms of the best portfolio construction scheme in the MENA region. |
id |
RCAP_6d87b54534cdbd7e70aa3b75e2717584 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/75181 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets?MENA RegionCap-weighted portfoliosEqual weighted portfoliosFundamental weighted portfoliosSmoothed cap-weighted portfoliosCiências Sociais::Economia e GestãoSocial SciencesPurpose - This study aims to investigate the performance of fundamental weighted portfolios (using sales, cash flows, dividends, book values and a composite of all these variables), an equal weighted portfolio and a smoothed cap-weighted (CW) portfolio in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) markets. The performance of these portfolios is compared with that of a CWportfolio for the period 2005 to 2015.Design/methodology/approach - The portfolios are formed using different concentration levels, different construction schemes and different sub-regions. The performance is assessed using a large set of risk-adjusted performance measures, including more robust measures in the context of multi-factor models, such as the Fama and French (1993) three-factor model, the Fama and French (2015) five-factormodel and a seven-factor model.Findings - The results show that the fundamental portfolios, with the exception of the sales portfolio, underperform the CW portfolio using either the traditional or more robust risk-adjusted performance measures. The underperformance of the fundamental portfolios is found to be robust using different concentration levels, different construction schemes and different sub-regions. The results also show that the equal weighted portfolio outperforms the CW portfolio using traditional risk-adjusted measures. However, after controlling for additional risk factors, this outperformance disappears.Practical implications - The failure of fundamental indexation in the emerging markets could help the researchers and the academics to search for the best weighting method that could be used as an alternative to theCW indexation method.Originality/value - The results of the study add evidence to the debatable propositions on the performance of fundamental portfolios in emerging markets. Furthermore, the findings may help domestic and international investors, practitioners and decision-makers to deepen their knowledge in terms of the best portfolio construction scheme in the MENA region.This work was carried out within the funding with COMPETE reference no POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006683, with the FCT/MEC's (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P.) financial support through national funding and by the ERDF through the Operational Programme on "Competitiveness and Internationalization COMPETE 2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement".Emerald Group Publishing LtdUniversidade do MinhoAbadi, Rasha Tawfiq YousifSilva, Florinda2019-01-012019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/75181engAbadi, R.T. and Silva, F. (2019), "Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets?", International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-07-2018-02301753-839410.1108/IMEFM-07-2018-0230https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMEFM-07-2018-0230/full/htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:05:06Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/75181Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:55:29.391412Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets? |
title |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets? |
spellingShingle |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets? Abadi, Rasha Tawfiq Yousif MENA Region Cap-weighted portfolios Equal weighted portfolios Fundamental weighted portfolios Smoothed cap-weighted portfolios Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão Social Sciences |
title_short |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets? |
title_full |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets? |
title_fullStr |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets? |
title_sort |
Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets? |
author |
Abadi, Rasha Tawfiq Yousif |
author_facet |
Abadi, Rasha Tawfiq Yousif Silva, Florinda |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Florinda |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abadi, Rasha Tawfiq Yousif Silva, Florinda |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
MENA Region Cap-weighted portfolios Equal weighted portfolios Fundamental weighted portfolios Smoothed cap-weighted portfolios Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão Social Sciences |
topic |
MENA Region Cap-weighted portfolios Equal weighted portfolios Fundamental weighted portfolios Smoothed cap-weighted portfolios Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão Social Sciences |
description |
Purpose - This study aims to investigate the performance of fundamental weighted portfolios (using sales, cash flows, dividends, book values and a composite of all these variables), an equal weighted portfolio and a smoothed cap-weighted (CW) portfolio in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) markets. The performance of these portfolios is compared with that of a CWportfolio for the period 2005 to 2015.Design/methodology/approach - The portfolios are formed using different concentration levels, different construction schemes and different sub-regions. The performance is assessed using a large set of risk-adjusted performance measures, including more robust measures in the context of multi-factor models, such as the Fama and French (1993) three-factor model, the Fama and French (2015) five-factormodel and a seven-factor model.Findings - The results show that the fundamental portfolios, with the exception of the sales portfolio, underperform the CW portfolio using either the traditional or more robust risk-adjusted performance measures. The underperformance of the fundamental portfolios is found to be robust using different concentration levels, different construction schemes and different sub-regions. The results also show that the equal weighted portfolio outperforms the CW portfolio using traditional risk-adjusted measures. However, after controlling for additional risk factors, this outperformance disappears.Practical implications - The failure of fundamental indexation in the emerging markets could help the researchers and the academics to search for the best weighting method that could be used as an alternative to theCW indexation method.Originality/value - The results of the study add evidence to the debatable propositions on the performance of fundamental portfolios in emerging markets. Furthermore, the findings may help domestic and international investors, practitioners and decision-makers to deepen their knowledge in terms of the best portfolio construction scheme in the MENA region. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/75181 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/75181 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Abadi, R.T. and Silva, F. (2019), "Do fundamental portfolios outperform in the MENA equity markets?", International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-07-2018-0230 1753-8394 10.1108/IMEFM-07-2018-0230 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMEFM-07-2018-0230/full/html |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132340039974912 |