Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Roos Lindgreen, Erik
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Opferkuch, Katelin, Walker, Anna Maria, Salomone, Roberta, Reyes, Tatiana, Raggi, Andrea, Simboli, Alberto, Vermeulen, Walter, Caeiro, Sandra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/12032
Resumo: An emerging research area is dedicated to developing approaches for assessing the ‘circularity’ of companies and their products, within the context of sustainability goals. However, empirical evidence on the uptake of these assessment approaches remains scarce. Using a purposive sampling, we conducted a survey receiving 155 responses and held 43 semi-structured interviews with Dutch and Italian companies active in circular economy (CE), pursuing three research aims: to explore the use of CE and sustainability assessment approaches; to study the process of developing assessment approaches; and to uncover benefits of—and barriers to—CE assessment. While we find high variability of assessment approaches, most often, companies develop tailor-made sustainability indicators and apply life cycle assessments to CE strategies. Importantly, assessment development for CE practices requires and facilitates collaboration with external stakeholders. Finally, we reflect on the paradox of standardisation versus tailoring of assessment approaches within the CE reality and recommend establishing company needs and capabilities before designing assessment approaches.
id RCAP_71351c27722ef520f55e64c0f870844f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/12032
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economyCircularity indicatorsCorporate sustainabilityMaterial flow analysisMixed methodsStakeholder engagementSustainability assessmentAn emerging research area is dedicated to developing approaches for assessing the ‘circularity’ of companies and their products, within the context of sustainability goals. However, empirical evidence on the uptake of these assessment approaches remains scarce. Using a purposive sampling, we conducted a survey receiving 155 responses and held 43 semi-structured interviews with Dutch and Italian companies active in circular economy (CE), pursuing three research aims: to explore the use of CE and sustainability assessment approaches; to study the process of developing assessment approaches; and to uncover benefits of—and barriers to—CE assessment. While we find high variability of assessment approaches, most often, companies develop tailor-made sustainability indicators and apply life cycle assessments to CE strategies. Importantly, assessment development for CE practices requires and facilitates collaboration with external stakeholders. Finally, we reflect on the paradox of standardisation versus tailoring of assessment approaches within the CE reality and recommend establishing company needs and capabilities before designing assessment approaches.This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 765198. The authors want to acknowledge and thank all of the survey and interview respondents who participated in this research for their time and valuable contributions; special thanks to the Ecoinnovazione team for supporting the creation and testing of the survey and Nadia Lambiase from Mercato Circolare as well as other CE network coordinators for helping us to disseminate the survey and Alfredo Cartone for his insights concerning the statistical analysis. Also, thanks for the support given to CENSE by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the strategic project UID/AMB/04085/2019.Repositório AbertoRoos Lindgreen, ErikOpferkuch, KatelinWalker, Anna MariaSalomone, RobertaReyes, TatianaRaggi, AndreaSimboli, AlbertoVermeulen, WalterCaeiro, Sandra2022-07-14T15:06:59Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/12032eng0964-4733 (Print)https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2962info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-16T15:41:04Zoai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/12032Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:51:23.136550Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy
title Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy
spellingShingle Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy
Roos Lindgreen, Erik
Circularity indicators
Corporate sustainability
Material flow analysis
Mixed methods
Stakeholder engagement
Sustainability assessment
title_short Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy
title_full Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy
title_fullStr Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy
title_full_unstemmed Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy
title_sort Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy
author Roos Lindgreen, Erik
author_facet Roos Lindgreen, Erik
Opferkuch, Katelin
Walker, Anna Maria
Salomone, Roberta
Reyes, Tatiana
Raggi, Andrea
Simboli, Alberto
Vermeulen, Walter
Caeiro, Sandra
author_role author
author2 Opferkuch, Katelin
Walker, Anna Maria
Salomone, Roberta
Reyes, Tatiana
Raggi, Andrea
Simboli, Alberto
Vermeulen, Walter
Caeiro, Sandra
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Aberto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Roos Lindgreen, Erik
Opferkuch, Katelin
Walker, Anna Maria
Salomone, Roberta
Reyes, Tatiana
Raggi, Andrea
Simboli, Alberto
Vermeulen, Walter
Caeiro, Sandra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Circularity indicators
Corporate sustainability
Material flow analysis
Mixed methods
Stakeholder engagement
Sustainability assessment
topic Circularity indicators
Corporate sustainability
Material flow analysis
Mixed methods
Stakeholder engagement
Sustainability assessment
description An emerging research area is dedicated to developing approaches for assessing the ‘circularity’ of companies and their products, within the context of sustainability goals. However, empirical evidence on the uptake of these assessment approaches remains scarce. Using a purposive sampling, we conducted a survey receiving 155 responses and held 43 semi-structured interviews with Dutch and Italian companies active in circular economy (CE), pursuing three research aims: to explore the use of CE and sustainability assessment approaches; to study the process of developing assessment approaches; and to uncover benefits of—and barriers to—CE assessment. While we find high variability of assessment approaches, most often, companies develop tailor-made sustainability indicators and apply life cycle assessments to CE strategies. Importantly, assessment development for CE practices requires and facilitates collaboration with external stakeholders. Finally, we reflect on the paradox of standardisation versus tailoring of assessment approaches within the CE reality and recommend establishing company needs and capabilities before designing assessment approaches.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-14T15:06:59Z
2022
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/12032
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/12032
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0964-4733 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2962
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135104135593984