Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gales, Tammy
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Solan, Lawrence M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/3286
Resumo: “It has been said that the victim of a sexual assault is actually assaulted twice – once by the offender and once by the criminal justice system2”. In the U.S. court system, the principal player is the defense lawyer who crossexamines the complaining witness. The literature to date has not linguistically examined the extent to which the actual questioning differs from questioning in similar cases. Thus, we ask: other than the fact that the crime is so personal, what is different about the language of sexual and non-sexual assault trials? We obtained one transcript of three types of trial (sexual assault by a male on a female; non-sexual assault by a male on a female; and non-sexual assault by a male on a male) and analyzed the cross-examinations using Appraisal Analysis (Martin and White, 2005), which identifies a speaker or writer’s stance toward another person or proposition. The findings revealed similar strategies; however, while all three lawyers effectively and legally discredit the witness, there are subtle differences in the judgements they imply. Of course, we cannot generalize the findings from these three cases to claim distinctions between the cross-examination strategies used in sexual and non-sexual assault cases. However, our main goal in this initial study is to demonstrate the usefulness of Appraisal Analysis as a tool for achieving a more nuanced understanding of the use of stance markers during cross-examination. It may be that it is this strategy that inhibits many women from pursuing rape cases in court; if so, Appraisal Analysis would be a useful tool for future research on a larger data set.
id RCAP_7567b4397fe047c7c23b76d11c09b754
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/3286
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal AnalysisArticles“It has been said that the victim of a sexual assault is actually assaulted twice – once by the offender and once by the criminal justice system2”. In the U.S. court system, the principal player is the defense lawyer who crossexamines the complaining witness. The literature to date has not linguistically examined the extent to which the actual questioning differs from questioning in similar cases. Thus, we ask: other than the fact that the crime is so personal, what is different about the language of sexual and non-sexual assault trials? We obtained one transcript of three types of trial (sexual assault by a male on a female; non-sexual assault by a male on a female; and non-sexual assault by a male on a male) and analyzed the cross-examinations using Appraisal Analysis (Martin and White, 2005), which identifies a speaker or writer’s stance toward another person or proposition. The findings revealed similar strategies; however, while all three lawyers effectively and legally discredit the witness, there are subtle differences in the judgements they imply. Of course, we cannot generalize the findings from these three cases to claim distinctions between the cross-examination strategies used in sexual and non-sexual assault cases. However, our main goal in this initial study is to demonstrate the usefulness of Appraisal Analysis as a tool for achieving a more nuanced understanding of the use of stance markers during cross-examination. It may be that it is this strategy that inhibits many women from pursuing rape cases in court; if so, Appraisal Analysis would be a useful tool for future research on a larger data set.Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto2017-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/3286por2183-3745Gales, TammySolan, Lawrence M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-01-13T03:47:28Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/3286Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:31:22.522426Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis
title Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis
spellingShingle Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis
Gales, Tammy
Articles
title_short Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis
title_full Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis
title_fullStr Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis
title_sort Witness Cross-Examinations in Non-Stranger Assault Crimes: An Appraisal Analysis
author Gales, Tammy
author_facet Gales, Tammy
Solan, Lawrence M.
author_role author
author2 Solan, Lawrence M.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gales, Tammy
Solan, Lawrence M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Articles
topic Articles
description “It has been said that the victim of a sexual assault is actually assaulted twice – once by the offender and once by the criminal justice system2”. In the U.S. court system, the principal player is the defense lawyer who crossexamines the complaining witness. The literature to date has not linguistically examined the extent to which the actual questioning differs from questioning in similar cases. Thus, we ask: other than the fact that the crime is so personal, what is different about the language of sexual and non-sexual assault trials? We obtained one transcript of three types of trial (sexual assault by a male on a female; non-sexual assault by a male on a female; and non-sexual assault by a male on a male) and analyzed the cross-examinations using Appraisal Analysis (Martin and White, 2005), which identifies a speaker or writer’s stance toward another person or proposition. The findings revealed similar strategies; however, while all three lawyers effectively and legally discredit the witness, there are subtle differences in the judgements they imply. Of course, we cannot generalize the findings from these three cases to claim distinctions between the cross-examination strategies used in sexual and non-sexual assault cases. However, our main goal in this initial study is to demonstrate the usefulness of Appraisal Analysis as a tool for achieving a more nuanced understanding of the use of stance markers during cross-examination. It may be that it is this strategy that inhibits many women from pursuing rape cases in court; if so, Appraisal Analysis would be a useful tool for future research on a larger data set.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-18
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/3286
url https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/3286
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-3745
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130768459431936