“Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gebert, Raoul
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6833
Resumo: In December 2021, the European Commission proposed a directive creating five criteria for the presumed classification of platform economy workers as salaried employees. The issue is timely, of course, as the digital organisation of work continues to grow rapidly. Our article contrasts the merits and limitations of this initiative to the Canadian experience concerning so-called independent contractors in the platform economy. In fact, Canadian labour law has long recognised a third status of workers—dependent contractors. It permits collective bargaining, while platform workers remain autonomous, notably for tax purposes. Immediately, the striking similarities between the European Union’s five criteria and judicial tests applied by Canadian labour tribunals seem to indicate that both entities are moving in the same direction. However, the federal structure of labour law in Canada and the single market’s social dimension also pose important challenges regarding the uniform implementation of new protections. Based on recent fieldwork in Toronto, and as the European Union directive moves into the approval and implementation stages, our article addresses the research question of how basic labour rights in the platform economy progress similarly (or differently), and which actors are driving the change on each side of the Atlantic. We argue that this policy field provides labour market actors with opportunities for “institutional experimentation” navigating the openings and limitations of federalism.
id RCAP_75eb0ef526b0abe03cfc3203db0febcf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6833
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform WorkersCanada; digital labour platforms; European Union; labour law; labour policy; trade unionsIn December 2021, the European Commission proposed a directive creating five criteria for the presumed classification of platform economy workers as salaried employees. The issue is timely, of course, as the digital organisation of work continues to grow rapidly. Our article contrasts the merits and limitations of this initiative to the Canadian experience concerning so-called independent contractors in the platform economy. In fact, Canadian labour law has long recognised a third status of workers—dependent contractors. It permits collective bargaining, while platform workers remain autonomous, notably for tax purposes. Immediately, the striking similarities between the European Union’s five criteria and judicial tests applied by Canadian labour tribunals seem to indicate that both entities are moving in the same direction. However, the federal structure of labour law in Canada and the single market’s social dimension also pose important challenges regarding the uniform implementation of new protections. Based on recent fieldwork in Toronto, and as the European Union directive moves into the approval and implementation stages, our article addresses the research question of how basic labour rights in the platform economy progress similarly (or differently), and which actors are driving the change on each side of the Atlantic. We argue that this policy field provides labour market actors with opportunities for “institutional experimentation” navigating the openings and limitations of federalism.Cogitatio Press2023-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6833https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6833Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies; 276-2882183-246310.17645/pag.i360reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6833https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6833/3394https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/6833/3454Copyright (c) 2023 Raoul Gebertinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGebert, Raoul2023-11-23T15:15:20Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6833Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:31:38.433887Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers
title “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers
spellingShingle “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers
Gebert, Raoul
Canada; digital labour platforms; European Union; labour law; labour policy; trade unions
title_short “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers
title_full “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers
title_fullStr “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers
title_full_unstemmed “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers
title_sort “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers
author Gebert, Raoul
author_facet Gebert, Raoul
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gebert, Raoul
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Canada; digital labour platforms; European Union; labour law; labour policy; trade unions
topic Canada; digital labour platforms; European Union; labour law; labour policy; trade unions
description In December 2021, the European Commission proposed a directive creating five criteria for the presumed classification of platform economy workers as salaried employees. The issue is timely, of course, as the digital organisation of work continues to grow rapidly. Our article contrasts the merits and limitations of this initiative to the Canadian experience concerning so-called independent contractors in the platform economy. In fact, Canadian labour law has long recognised a third status of workers—dependent contractors. It permits collective bargaining, while platform workers remain autonomous, notably for tax purposes. Immediately, the striking similarities between the European Union’s five criteria and judicial tests applied by Canadian labour tribunals seem to indicate that both entities are moving in the same direction. However, the federal structure of labour law in Canada and the single market’s social dimension also pose important challenges regarding the uniform implementation of new protections. Based on recent fieldwork in Toronto, and as the European Union directive moves into the approval and implementation stages, our article addresses the research question of how basic labour rights in the platform economy progress similarly (or differently), and which actors are driving the change on each side of the Atlantic. We argue that this policy field provides labour market actors with opportunities for “institutional experimentation” navigating the openings and limitations of federalism.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6833
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6833
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6833
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6833
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6833/3394
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/6833/3454
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Raoul Gebert
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Raoul Gebert
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies; 276-288
2183-2463
10.17645/pag.i360
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133584105144320