Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Biologic agents acquired a growing relevance in dermatology, however, adverse events (AE) and reasons to discontinue therapy are not completely known. The objective of this study is to analyse the reasons behind the discontinuation of biologics and characterize the AE in this population of patients. Material and Methods: Descriptive observational study, including patients over 18-years-old under treatment with biologic agents in the Dermatology Department of Hospital de Santarém, Portugal, between January/2007 and December/2017. We analysed reasons for therapeutic discontinuation, defined as the omission of at least 2 consecutive administrations, whatever the reason implicated and whether or not proposed by the dermatologist. Results: A total of 262 cycles of treatment were performed, in 138 patients (59.4% male, 40.6% female). Psoriasis was the most prevalent diagnosis (93.5% of the patients). Cycles of treatment with 8 biologic agents were analysed: etanercept (46.6%), adalimumab (31.3%) and ustekinumab (12.6%) were the most represented. During the study period, 167 suspensions were registered, for which 170 justifications were indicated. The most prevalent causes were: primary or secondary therapeutic failure (35,3%), AE (31.2%), factors related to the patient/noncompliance (17.1%), surgical intervention (7.1%) and excellent clinical response/absence of lesions (6.5%). Among therapeutic discontinuations motivated by AE (n=53), infections were the most frequent cause (35.8%, n=19), followed by malignancies (15.1%, n=8), hematological abnormalities (13.2%, n=7), neurological symptoms (9.4%, n=5) and local reactions at the injection site (5.7%, n=3). Discussion: The main cause for discontinuation of biologics was therapeutic failure, immediately followed by AE. Two different patterns of discontinuation were apparent: definitive suspension, commonly decided by the physician due to primary or secondary therapeutic failure, and temporary discontinuation, frequently without formal medical indication, due to AE, later resuming the same drug. We found a higher percentage of therapeutic cycles discontinued due to AE than reported in the literature. Temporary suspensions of the biologics due to AE, often not sufficiently valued by the dermatologist, are probably under-recognized and contribute to a suboptimal pattern of use of biologics and worse clinical outcomes. |
id |
RCAP_77c488b17bcbf2a7662fd6e83f4d2a37 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 YearsPorque Suspendemos os Agentes Biológicos? Estudo Retrospectivo de 11 AnosBiological Therapy /adverse effectsWithholding TreatmentSuspensão do TratamentoTerapia Biológica/efeitos adversosIntroduction: Biologic agents acquired a growing relevance in dermatology, however, adverse events (AE) and reasons to discontinue therapy are not completely known. The objective of this study is to analyse the reasons behind the discontinuation of biologics and characterize the AE in this population of patients. Material and Methods: Descriptive observational study, including patients over 18-years-old under treatment with biologic agents in the Dermatology Department of Hospital de Santarém, Portugal, between January/2007 and December/2017. We analysed reasons for therapeutic discontinuation, defined as the omission of at least 2 consecutive administrations, whatever the reason implicated and whether or not proposed by the dermatologist. Results: A total of 262 cycles of treatment were performed, in 138 patients (59.4% male, 40.6% female). Psoriasis was the most prevalent diagnosis (93.5% of the patients). Cycles of treatment with 8 biologic agents were analysed: etanercept (46.6%), adalimumab (31.3%) and ustekinumab (12.6%) were the most represented. During the study period, 167 suspensions were registered, for which 170 justifications were indicated. The most prevalent causes were: primary or secondary therapeutic failure (35,3%), AE (31.2%), factors related to the patient/noncompliance (17.1%), surgical intervention (7.1%) and excellent clinical response/absence of lesions (6.5%). Among therapeutic discontinuations motivated by AE (n=53), infections were the most frequent cause (35.8%, n=19), followed by malignancies (15.1%, n=8), hematological abnormalities (13.2%, n=7), neurological symptoms (9.4%, n=5) and local reactions at the injection site (5.7%, n=3). Discussion: The main cause for discontinuation of biologics was therapeutic failure, immediately followed by AE. Two different patterns of discontinuation were apparent: definitive suspension, commonly decided by the physician due to primary or secondary therapeutic failure, and temporary discontinuation, frequently without formal medical indication, due to AE, later resuming the same drug. We found a higher percentage of therapeutic cycles discontinued due to AE than reported in the literature. Temporary suspensions of the biologics due to AE, often not sufficiently valued by the dermatologist, are probably under-recognized and contribute to a suboptimal pattern of use of biologics and worse clinical outcomes.Introdução: Os agentes biológicos assumiram uma relevância crescente no âmbito da Dermatologia. Contudo, os eventos adversos (EA) associados a estes tratamentos e as razões para a sua suspensão não estão totalmente esclarecidos. O Objectivo deste estudo é analisar os motivos que conduziram à suspensão de terapêuticas biológicas e caracterizar o perfil de EA na população de doentes sob esta terapêutica. Material e Métodos: Estudo observacional descritivo dos doentes acima de 18 anos sob terapêutica biológica no Serviço de Dermatologia do Hospital de Santarém EPE, entre Janeiro/2007 e Dezembro/2017. Foram avaliadas as causas de suspensão terapêutica, definida como a omissão de pelo menos 2 administrações consecutivas do fármaco, independentemente do motivo implicado e da existência, ou não, de recomendação médica para tal. Resultados: Foram avaliados 262 ciclos de tratamento, correspondentes a 138 doentes. Psoríase foi o diagnóstico predominante (93,5% dos doentes). Foram avaliados ciclos de tratamento com 8 biológicos, tendo o etanercept (46,6%), o adalimumab (31,3%) e o ustecinumab (12,6%) sido os mais representados. No período em estudo registaram-se 167 suspensões, invocando-se 170 justificações. Os fundamentos mais frequentes para a suspensão dos biológicos foram: falência primária ou secundária (35,3%), EA (31,2%), factores relacionados com o doente/má adesão à terapêutica (17,1%), intervenção cirúrgica (7,1%) e excelente resposta clínica/ausência de lesões (6,5%). Nas suspensões terapêuticas motivadas por EA (n=53), as infecções foram a causa mais frequente (35,8%, n=19), seguidas de neoplasias (15,1%, n=8), alterações hematológicas (13,2%, n=7), sintomatologia neurológica (9,4%, n=5) e reacções no local da injecção (5,7%, n=3). Conclusão: A principal causa de suspensão de biológicos foi a falência terapêutica, logo seguida dos EA. Dois padrões distintos de suspensão dos biológicos foram aparentes: a descontinuação definitiva, geralmente decretada pelo médico por falência terapêutica primária ou secundária, e a suspensão temporária, frequentemente sem indicação médica formal, por EA, mais tarde retomando o mesmo agente biológico. Determinámos uma incidência superior de ciclos terapêuticos suspensos por EA do que o reportado na literatura. As suspensões temporárias por EA, frequentemente não valorizadas pelo dermatologista, são provavelmente sub-reconhecidas e contribuem para um padrão deficitário de utilização dos biológicos, com prejuízo dos resultados clínicos obtidos.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2020-07-14T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 78 No 2 (2020): April - June; 123-128Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 78 n. 2 (2020): Abril - Junho; 123-1282182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1175https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1175/833Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereologyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGil, FranciscoRato, MargaridaMonteiro, AnaParente, JoanaMartins, CésarAranha, JoãoSilva, Maria João2022-10-06T12:35:14Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:12.765286Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years Porque Suspendemos os Agentes Biológicos? Estudo Retrospectivo de 11 Anos |
title |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years |
spellingShingle |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years Gil, Francisco Biological Therapy /adverse effects Withholding Treatment Suspensão do Tratamento Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos |
title_short |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years |
title_full |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years |
title_fullStr |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years |
title_sort |
Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years |
author |
Gil, Francisco |
author_facet |
Gil, Francisco Rato, Margarida Monteiro, Ana Parente, Joana Martins, César Aranha, João Silva, Maria João |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rato, Margarida Monteiro, Ana Parente, Joana Martins, César Aranha, João Silva, Maria João |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gil, Francisco Rato, Margarida Monteiro, Ana Parente, Joana Martins, César Aranha, João Silva, Maria João |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biological Therapy /adverse effects Withholding Treatment Suspensão do Tratamento Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos |
topic |
Biological Therapy /adverse effects Withholding Treatment Suspensão do Tratamento Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos |
description |
Introduction: Biologic agents acquired a growing relevance in dermatology, however, adverse events (AE) and reasons to discontinue therapy are not completely known. The objective of this study is to analyse the reasons behind the discontinuation of biologics and characterize the AE in this population of patients. Material and Methods: Descriptive observational study, including patients over 18-years-old under treatment with biologic agents in the Dermatology Department of Hospital de Santarém, Portugal, between January/2007 and December/2017. We analysed reasons for therapeutic discontinuation, defined as the omission of at least 2 consecutive administrations, whatever the reason implicated and whether or not proposed by the dermatologist. Results: A total of 262 cycles of treatment were performed, in 138 patients (59.4% male, 40.6% female). Psoriasis was the most prevalent diagnosis (93.5% of the patients). Cycles of treatment with 8 biologic agents were analysed: etanercept (46.6%), adalimumab (31.3%) and ustekinumab (12.6%) were the most represented. During the study period, 167 suspensions were registered, for which 170 justifications were indicated. The most prevalent causes were: primary or secondary therapeutic failure (35,3%), AE (31.2%), factors related to the patient/noncompliance (17.1%), surgical intervention (7.1%) and excellent clinical response/absence of lesions (6.5%). Among therapeutic discontinuations motivated by AE (n=53), infections were the most frequent cause (35.8%, n=19), followed by malignancies (15.1%, n=8), hematological abnormalities (13.2%, n=7), neurological symptoms (9.4%, n=5) and local reactions at the injection site (5.7%, n=3). Discussion: The main cause for discontinuation of biologics was therapeutic failure, immediately followed by AE. Two different patterns of discontinuation were apparent: definitive suspension, commonly decided by the physician due to primary or secondary therapeutic failure, and temporary discontinuation, frequently without formal medical indication, due to AE, later resuming the same drug. We found a higher percentage of therapeutic cycles discontinued due to AE than reported in the literature. Temporary suspensions of the biologics due to AE, often not sufficiently valued by the dermatologist, are probably under-recognized and contribute to a suboptimal pattern of use of biologics and worse clinical outcomes. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-14T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175 oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1175 https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175 https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1175/833 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 78 No 2 (2020): April - June; 123-128 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 78 n. 2 (2020): Abril - Junho; 123-128 2182-2409 2182-2395 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130567646642176 |