Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gil, Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rato, Margarida, Monteiro, Ana, Parente, Joana, Martins, César, Aranha, João, Silva, Maria João
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175
Resumo: Introduction: Biologic agents acquired a growing relevance in dermatology, however, adverse events (AE) and reasons to discontinue therapy are not completely known. The objective of this study is to analyse the reasons behind the discontinuation of biologics and characterize the AE in this population of patients. Material and Methods: Descriptive observational study, including patients over 18-years-old under treatment with biologic agents in the Dermatology Department of Hospital de Santarém, Portugal, between January/2007 and December/2017. We analysed reasons for therapeutic discontinuation, defined as the omission of at least 2 consecutive administrations, whatever the reason implicated and whether or not proposed by the dermatologist. Results: A total of 262 cycles of treatment were performed, in 138 patients (59.4% male, 40.6% female). Psoriasis was the most prevalent diagnosis (93.5% of the patients). Cycles of treatment with 8 biologic agents were analysed: etanercept (46.6%), adalimumab (31.3%) and ustekinumab (12.6%) were the most represented. During the study period, 167 suspensions were registered, for which 170 justifications were indicated. The most prevalent causes were: primary or secondary therapeutic failure (35,3%), AE (31.2%), factors related to the patient/noncompliance (17.1%), surgical intervention (7.1%) and excellent clinical response/absence of lesions (6.5%). Among therapeutic discontinuations motivated by AE (n=53), infections were the most frequent cause (35.8%, n=19), followed by malignancies (15.1%, n=8), hematological abnormalities (13.2%, n=7), neurological symptoms (9.4%, n=5) and local reactions at the injection site (5.7%, n=3). Discussion: The main cause for discontinuation of biologics was therapeutic failure, immediately followed by AE. Two different patterns of discontinuation were apparent: definitive suspension, commonly decided by the physician due to primary or secondary therapeutic failure, and temporary discontinuation, frequently without formal medical indication, due to AE, later resuming the same drug. We found a higher percentage of therapeutic cycles discontinued due to AE than reported in the literature. Temporary suspensions of the biologics due to AE, often not sufficiently valued by the dermatologist, are probably under-recognized and contribute to a suboptimal pattern of use of biologics and worse clinical outcomes.
id RCAP_77c488b17bcbf2a7662fd6e83f4d2a37
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 YearsPorque Suspendemos os Agentes Biológicos? Estudo Retrospectivo de 11 AnosBiological Therapy /adverse effectsWithholding TreatmentSuspensão do TratamentoTerapia Biológica/efeitos adversosIntroduction: Biologic agents acquired a growing relevance in dermatology, however, adverse events (AE) and reasons to discontinue therapy are not completely known. The objective of this study is to analyse the reasons behind the discontinuation of biologics and characterize the AE in this population of patients. Material and Methods: Descriptive observational study, including patients over 18-years-old under treatment with biologic agents in the Dermatology Department of Hospital de Santarém, Portugal, between January/2007 and December/2017. We analysed reasons for therapeutic discontinuation, defined as the omission of at least 2 consecutive administrations, whatever the reason implicated and whether or not proposed by the dermatologist. Results: A total of 262 cycles of treatment were performed, in 138 patients (59.4% male, 40.6% female). Psoriasis was the most prevalent diagnosis (93.5% of the patients). Cycles of treatment with 8 biologic agents were analysed: etanercept (46.6%), adalimumab (31.3%) and ustekinumab (12.6%) were the most represented. During the study period, 167 suspensions were registered, for which 170 justifications were indicated. The most prevalent causes were: primary or secondary therapeutic failure (35,3%), AE (31.2%), factors related to the patient/noncompliance (17.1%), surgical intervention (7.1%) and excellent clinical response/absence of lesions (6.5%). Among therapeutic discontinuations motivated by AE (n=53), infections were the most frequent cause (35.8%, n=19), followed by malignancies (15.1%, n=8), hematological abnormalities (13.2%, n=7), neurological symptoms (9.4%, n=5) and local reactions at the injection site (5.7%, n=3). Discussion: The main cause for discontinuation of biologics was therapeutic failure, immediately followed by AE. Two different patterns of discontinuation were apparent: definitive suspension, commonly decided by the physician due to primary or secondary therapeutic failure, and temporary discontinuation, frequently without formal medical indication, due to AE, later resuming the same drug. We found a higher percentage of therapeutic cycles discontinued due to AE than reported in the literature. Temporary suspensions of the biologics due to AE, often not sufficiently valued by the dermatologist, are probably under-recognized and contribute to a suboptimal pattern of use of biologics and worse clinical outcomes.Introdução: Os agentes biológicos assumiram uma relevância crescente no âmbito da Dermatologia. Contudo, os eventos adversos (EA) associados a estes tratamentos e as razões para a sua suspensão não estão totalmente esclarecidos. O Objectivo deste estudo é analisar os motivos que conduziram à suspensão de terapêuticas biológicas e caracterizar o perfil de EA na população de doentes sob esta terapêutica. Material e Métodos: Estudo observacional descritivo dos doentes acima de 18 anos sob terapêutica biológica no Serviço de Dermatologia do Hospital de Santarém EPE, entre Janeiro/2007 e Dezembro/2017. Foram avaliadas as causas de suspensão terapêutica, definida como a omissão de pelo menos 2 administrações consecutivas do fármaco, independentemente do motivo implicado e da existência, ou não, de recomendação médica para tal. Resultados: Foram avaliados 262 ciclos de tratamento, correspondentes a 138 doentes. Psoríase foi o diagnóstico predominante (93,5% dos doentes). Foram avaliados ciclos de tratamento com 8 biológicos, tendo o etanercept (46,6%), o adalimumab (31,3%) e o ustecinumab (12,6%) sido os mais representados. No período em estudo registaram-se 167 suspensões, invocando-se 170 justificações. Os fundamentos mais frequentes para a suspensão dos biológicos foram: falência primária ou secundária (35,3%), EA (31,2%), factores relacionados com o doente/má adesão à terapêutica (17,1%), intervenção cirúrgica (7,1%) e excelente resposta clínica/ausência de lesões (6,5%). Nas suspensões terapêuticas motivadas por EA (n=53), as infecções foram a causa mais frequente (35,8%, n=19), seguidas de neoplasias (15,1%, n=8), alterações hematológicas (13,2%, n=7), sintomatologia neurológica (9,4%, n=5) e reacções no local da injecção (5,7%, n=3). Conclusão: A principal causa de suspensão de biológicos foi a falência terapêutica, logo seguida dos EA. Dois padrões distintos de suspensão dos biológicos foram aparentes: a descontinuação definitiva, geralmente decretada pelo médico por falência terapêutica primária ou secundária, e a suspensão temporária, frequentemente sem indicação médica formal, por EA, mais tarde retomando o mesmo agente biológico. Determinámos uma incidência superior de ciclos terapêuticos suspensos por EA do que o reportado na literatura. As suspensões temporárias por EA, frequentemente não valorizadas pelo dermatologista, são provavelmente sub-reconhecidas e contribuem para um padrão deficitário de utilização dos biológicos, com prejuízo dos resultados clínicos obtidos.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2020-07-14T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 78 No 2 (2020): April - June; 123-128Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 78 n. 2 (2020): Abril - Junho; 123-1282182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1175https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1175/833Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereologyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGil, FranciscoRato, MargaridaMonteiro, AnaParente, JoanaMartins, CésarAranha, JoãoSilva, Maria João2022-10-06T12:35:14Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:12.765286Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
Porque Suspendemos os Agentes Biológicos? Estudo Retrospectivo de 11 Anos
title Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
spellingShingle Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
Gil, Francisco
Biological Therapy /adverse effects
Withholding Treatment
Suspensão do Tratamento
Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos
title_short Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
title_full Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
title_fullStr Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
title_full_unstemmed Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
title_sort Why do we Discontinue Biologic Agents? A Retrospective Study of 11 Years
author Gil, Francisco
author_facet Gil, Francisco
Rato, Margarida
Monteiro, Ana
Parente, Joana
Martins, César
Aranha, João
Silva, Maria João
author_role author
author2 Rato, Margarida
Monteiro, Ana
Parente, Joana
Martins, César
Aranha, João
Silva, Maria João
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gil, Francisco
Rato, Margarida
Monteiro, Ana
Parente, Joana
Martins, César
Aranha, João
Silva, Maria João
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biological Therapy /adverse effects
Withholding Treatment
Suspensão do Tratamento
Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos
topic Biological Therapy /adverse effects
Withholding Treatment
Suspensão do Tratamento
Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos
description Introduction: Biologic agents acquired a growing relevance in dermatology, however, adverse events (AE) and reasons to discontinue therapy are not completely known. The objective of this study is to analyse the reasons behind the discontinuation of biologics and characterize the AE in this population of patients. Material and Methods: Descriptive observational study, including patients over 18-years-old under treatment with biologic agents in the Dermatology Department of Hospital de Santarém, Portugal, between January/2007 and December/2017. We analysed reasons for therapeutic discontinuation, defined as the omission of at least 2 consecutive administrations, whatever the reason implicated and whether or not proposed by the dermatologist. Results: A total of 262 cycles of treatment were performed, in 138 patients (59.4% male, 40.6% female). Psoriasis was the most prevalent diagnosis (93.5% of the patients). Cycles of treatment with 8 biologic agents were analysed: etanercept (46.6%), adalimumab (31.3%) and ustekinumab (12.6%) were the most represented. During the study period, 167 suspensions were registered, for which 170 justifications were indicated. The most prevalent causes were: primary or secondary therapeutic failure (35,3%), AE (31.2%), factors related to the patient/noncompliance (17.1%), surgical intervention (7.1%) and excellent clinical response/absence of lesions (6.5%). Among therapeutic discontinuations motivated by AE (n=53), infections were the most frequent cause (35.8%, n=19), followed by malignancies (15.1%, n=8), hematological abnormalities (13.2%, n=7), neurological symptoms (9.4%, n=5) and local reactions at the injection site (5.7%, n=3). Discussion: The main cause for discontinuation of biologics was therapeutic failure, immediately followed by AE. Two different patterns of discontinuation were apparent: definitive suspension, commonly decided by the physician due to primary or secondary therapeutic failure, and temporary discontinuation, frequently without formal medical indication, due to AE, later resuming the same drug. We found a higher percentage of therapeutic cycles discontinued due to AE than reported in the literature. Temporary suspensions of the biologics due to AE, often not sufficiently valued by the dermatologist, are probably under-recognized and contribute to a suboptimal pattern of use of biologics and worse clinical outcomes.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-14T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175
url https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1175
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1175
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.2.1175
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1175/833
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 78 No 2 (2020): April - June; 123-128
Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 78 n. 2 (2020): Abril - Junho; 123-128
2182-2409
2182-2395
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130567646642176