Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/14995 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To evaluate the differences between three methods of classification of recurrences in patients with head and neck tumours treated with Radiation Therapy (RT). Materials and methods: 367 patients with head and neck tumours were included in the study. Tumour recurrences were delineated in the CT images taken during patient follow-up and deformable registration was used to transfer this volume into the planning CT. The methods used to classify recurrences were: methodCTV quantified the intersection volume between the recurrence and the Clinical Target Volume (CTV); methodTV quantified the intersection between the Treated Volume and the recurrence (for method CTV and TV, recurrences were classified in-field if more than 95% of their volume were inside the volume of interest, marginal if the intersection was between 20-95% and outfield otherwise); and methodCOM was based on the position of the Centre Of Mass of the recurrence. A dose assessment in the recurrence volume was also made. Results: The 2-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional recurrence incidence was 10%. Tumour recurrences occurred in 22 patients in a mean time of 16.5 ± 9.4 months resulting in 28 recurrence volumes. The percentage of in-field recurrences for methods CTV, TV and COM was 7%, 43% and 50%, respectively. Agreement between the three methods in characterizing individually in-field and marginal recurrences was found only in six cases. Methods CTV and COM agreed in 14. The percentage of outfield recurrences was 29% using all methods. For local recurrences (in-field or marginal to gross disease) the average difference between the prescribed dose and D 98% in the recurrence volume was -5.2 ± 3.5% (range: -10.1%-0.9%). Conclusions: The classification of in-field and marginal recurrences is very dependent on the method used to characterize recurrences. Using methods TV and COM the largest percentage of tumour recurrences occurred in-field in tissues irradiated with high doses. Keywords: Head and neck tumours, Radiation therapy, Characterization of tumour recurrences, Geometric methods, Dosimetric assessment |
id |
RCAP_7b961581003fea2fe52a7148914ca23e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/14995 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumoursHead and neck tumoursRadiation therapyCharacterization of tumour recurrencesGeometric methodsDosimetric assessmentPurpose: To evaluate the differences between three methods of classification of recurrences in patients with head and neck tumours treated with Radiation Therapy (RT). Materials and methods: 367 patients with head and neck tumours were included in the study. Tumour recurrences were delineated in the CT images taken during patient follow-up and deformable registration was used to transfer this volume into the planning CT. The methods used to classify recurrences were: methodCTV quantified the intersection volume between the recurrence and the Clinical Target Volume (CTV); methodTV quantified the intersection between the Treated Volume and the recurrence (for method CTV and TV, recurrences were classified in-field if more than 95% of their volume were inside the volume of interest, marginal if the intersection was between 20-95% and outfield otherwise); and methodCOM was based on the position of the Centre Of Mass of the recurrence. A dose assessment in the recurrence volume was also made. Results: The 2-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional recurrence incidence was 10%. Tumour recurrences occurred in 22 patients in a mean time of 16.5 ± 9.4 months resulting in 28 recurrence volumes. The percentage of in-field recurrences for methods CTV, TV and COM was 7%, 43% and 50%, respectively. Agreement between the three methods in characterizing individually in-field and marginal recurrences was found only in six cases. Methods CTV and COM agreed in 14. The percentage of outfield recurrences was 29% using all methods. For local recurrences (in-field or marginal to gross disease) the average difference between the prescribed dose and D 98% in the recurrence volume was -5.2 ± 3.5% (range: -10.1%-0.9%). Conclusions: The classification of in-field and marginal recurrences is very dependent on the method used to characterize recurrences. Using methods TV and COM the largest percentage of tumour recurrences occurred in-field in tissues irradiated with high doses. Keywords: Head and neck tumours, Radiation therapy, Characterization of tumour recurrences, Geometric methods, Dosimetric assessmentBioMed Central2016-01-06T16:50:33Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z2015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/14995eng1748-717X10.1186/s13014-015-0345-4Ferreira, Brigida CostaMarques, Rui ValeKhouri, LeilaSantos, TâniaSá-Couto, PedroLopes, Maria do Carmoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T03:55:46Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/14995Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-06T03:55:46Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours |
title |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours |
spellingShingle |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours Ferreira, Brigida Costa Head and neck tumours Radiation therapy Characterization of tumour recurrences Geometric methods Dosimetric assessment |
title_short |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours |
title_full |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours |
title_fullStr |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours |
title_sort |
Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours |
author |
Ferreira, Brigida Costa |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Brigida Costa Marques, Rui Vale Khouri, Leila Santos, Tânia Sá-Couto, Pedro Lopes, Maria do Carmo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques, Rui Vale Khouri, Leila Santos, Tânia Sá-Couto, Pedro Lopes, Maria do Carmo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Brigida Costa Marques, Rui Vale Khouri, Leila Santos, Tânia Sá-Couto, Pedro Lopes, Maria do Carmo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Head and neck tumours Radiation therapy Characterization of tumour recurrences Geometric methods Dosimetric assessment |
topic |
Head and neck tumours Radiation therapy Characterization of tumour recurrences Geometric methods Dosimetric assessment |
description |
Purpose: To evaluate the differences between three methods of classification of recurrences in patients with head and neck tumours treated with Radiation Therapy (RT). Materials and methods: 367 patients with head and neck tumours were included in the study. Tumour recurrences were delineated in the CT images taken during patient follow-up and deformable registration was used to transfer this volume into the planning CT. The methods used to classify recurrences were: methodCTV quantified the intersection volume between the recurrence and the Clinical Target Volume (CTV); methodTV quantified the intersection between the Treated Volume and the recurrence (for method CTV and TV, recurrences were classified in-field if more than 95% of their volume were inside the volume of interest, marginal if the intersection was between 20-95% and outfield otherwise); and methodCOM was based on the position of the Centre Of Mass of the recurrence. A dose assessment in the recurrence volume was also made. Results: The 2-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional recurrence incidence was 10%. Tumour recurrences occurred in 22 patients in a mean time of 16.5 ± 9.4 months resulting in 28 recurrence volumes. The percentage of in-field recurrences for methods CTV, TV and COM was 7%, 43% and 50%, respectively. Agreement between the three methods in characterizing individually in-field and marginal recurrences was found only in six cases. Methods CTV and COM agreed in 14. The percentage of outfield recurrences was 29% using all methods. For local recurrences (in-field or marginal to gross disease) the average difference between the prescribed dose and D 98% in the recurrence volume was -5.2 ± 3.5% (range: -10.1%-0.9%). Conclusions: The classification of in-field and marginal recurrences is very dependent on the method used to characterize recurrences. Using methods TV and COM the largest percentage of tumour recurrences occurred in-field in tissues irradiated with high doses. Keywords: Head and neck tumours, Radiation therapy, Characterization of tumour recurrences, Geometric methods, Dosimetric assessment |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z 2015 2016-01-06T16:50:33Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/14995 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/14995 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1748-717X 10.1186/s13014-015-0345-4 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BioMed Central |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BioMed Central |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817543547261288448 |