When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Correia, Isabel
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Alves, Hélder, Sutton, Robbie M., Ramos, Miguel, Pereira, Maria Gouveia, Vala, Jorge
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/8928
Resumo: Two factors increase the threat for individuals’ belief in a just world (BJW) posed by an innocent victim: the degree of the observer’s explicit endorsement of BJW and the fact that the victim shares a common identity with the observer. In this paper, we aim to investigate whether or not these two factors (BJW and ingroup identification) have an interaction effect on each of two mechanisms that reduce the threat to BJW: victim derogation and psychological distancing from the victims. In two studies with university students we predicted and found that BJW interacted with identification with an ingroup victim to predict victim derogation (Study 1) and disidentification from the group shared with the victim (Study 2). In Study 1, the positive relationship between BJW and derogation was significant for strongly identified participants but not for weakly identified participants. In Study 2, high BJW was associated with low ingroup identification only when group salience was activated.
id RCAP_7cc900c60768840396426001e52a989c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/8928
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identificationTwo factors increase the threat for individuals’ belief in a just world (BJW) posed by an innocent victim: the degree of the observer’s explicit endorsement of BJW and the fact that the victim shares a common identity with the observer. In this paper, we aim to investigate whether or not these two factors (BJW and ingroup identification) have an interaction effect on each of two mechanisms that reduce the threat to BJW: victim derogation and psychological distancing from the victims. In two studies with university students we predicted and found that BJW interacted with identification with an ingroup victim to predict victim derogation (Study 1) and disidentification from the group shared with the victim (Study 2). In Study 1, the positive relationship between BJW and derogation was significant for strongly identified participants but not for weakly identified participants. In Study 2, high BJW was associated with low ingroup identification only when group salience was activated.Repositório da Universidade de LisboaCorreia, IsabelAlves, HélderSutton, Robbie M.Ramos, MiguelPereira, Maria GouveiaVala, Jorge2013-08-01T10:34:08Z20122012-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/8928engCorreia, I., Alves, H., Sutton, R., Ramos, M., Gouveia-Pereira, Maria, Vala, J. (2012). When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 53 (6), 747-52info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T15:53:00Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/8928Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:33:17.145368Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification
title When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification
spellingShingle When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification
Correia, Isabel
title_short When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification
title_full When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification
title_fullStr When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification
title_full_unstemmed When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification
title_sort When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification
author Correia, Isabel
author_facet Correia, Isabel
Alves, Hélder
Sutton, Robbie M.
Ramos, Miguel
Pereira, Maria Gouveia
Vala, Jorge
author_role author
author2 Alves, Hélder
Sutton, Robbie M.
Ramos, Miguel
Pereira, Maria Gouveia
Vala, Jorge
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Correia, Isabel
Alves, Hélder
Sutton, Robbie M.
Ramos, Miguel
Pereira, Maria Gouveia
Vala, Jorge
description Two factors increase the threat for individuals’ belief in a just world (BJW) posed by an innocent victim: the degree of the observer’s explicit endorsement of BJW and the fact that the victim shares a common identity with the observer. In this paper, we aim to investigate whether or not these two factors (BJW and ingroup identification) have an interaction effect on each of two mechanisms that reduce the threat to BJW: victim derogation and psychological distancing from the victims. In two studies with university students we predicted and found that BJW interacted with identification with an ingroup victim to predict victim derogation (Study 1) and disidentification from the group shared with the victim (Study 2). In Study 1, the positive relationship between BJW and derogation was significant for strongly identified participants but not for weakly identified participants. In Study 2, high BJW was associated with low ingroup identification only when group salience was activated.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
2013-08-01T10:34:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/8928
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/8928
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Correia, I., Alves, H., Sutton, R., Ramos, M., Gouveia-Pereira, Maria, Vala, J. (2012). When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 53 (6), 747-52
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134227064684544