Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, S. E. H.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Carvalho, H., Esteves, F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12350
Resumo: Purpose: The current study sought to explore the factor structure of the WHOQOL-Bref in a sample of adults with mental illness. Methods: The study sample consisted of 403 participants recruited from inpatients and outpatients mental health care facilities. Factorial construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency of domains was performed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: While four of the five factors were conceptually similar to the original WHOQOL-Bref, our results suggest an alternative 5-domain model (psychological, physical, socialrelationships, environment and level of independence) with good-fit and adequate internal consistency. Thus, the level of independence domain was added to the four domains of the WHOQOL-Bref, since it demonstrates to be a theoretical autonomous domain, as proposed by the WHOQOL-100. Conclusions: The WHOQOL-Bref has shown to be an appropriate measure for the assessment of QOL in psychiatric samples; thus, a valuable tool to be incorporated as part of the routine clinical evaluation and monitoring, as well as an important indicator of treatment outcome and research. Our findings suggest a conceptual distinction between the physical health domain and level of independence in this short version of the WHOQOL. Meanwhile, although additional challenges are posed regarding the dimensionality of the WHOQOL-Bref, future research should reexamine the construct validity of this instrument in other samples of psychiatric consumers.
id RCAP_7d27c1665c0999242c503f20b19b7481
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12350
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sampleWHOQOL-BrefQuality of lifeMental illnessConfirmatory factor analysisPsychometricsPurpose: The current study sought to explore the factor structure of the WHOQOL-Bref in a sample of adults with mental illness. Methods: The study sample consisted of 403 participants recruited from inpatients and outpatients mental health care facilities. Factorial construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency of domains was performed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: While four of the five factors were conceptually similar to the original WHOQOL-Bref, our results suggest an alternative 5-domain model (psychological, physical, socialrelationships, environment and level of independence) with good-fit and adequate internal consistency. Thus, the level of independence domain was added to the four domains of the WHOQOL-Bref, since it demonstrates to be a theoretical autonomous domain, as proposed by the WHOQOL-100. Conclusions: The WHOQOL-Bref has shown to be an appropriate measure for the assessment of QOL in psychiatric samples; thus, a valuable tool to be incorporated as part of the routine clinical evaluation and monitoring, as well as an important indicator of treatment outcome and research. Our findings suggest a conceptual distinction between the physical health domain and level of independence in this short version of the WHOQOL. Meanwhile, although additional challenges are posed regarding the dimensionality of the WHOQOL-Bref, future research should reexamine the construct validity of this instrument in other samples of psychiatric consumers.Elsevier2017-01-13T15:59:32Z2016-01-01T00:00:00Z20162019-04-10T14:42:25Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/12350eng0165-178110.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.007Oliveira, S. E. H.Carvalho, H.Esteves, F.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:53:45Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12350Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:26:59.782985Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
title Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
spellingShingle Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
Oliveira, S. E. H.
WHOQOL-Bref
Quality of life
Mental illness
Confirmatory factor analysis
Psychometrics
title_short Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
title_full Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
title_fullStr Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
title_full_unstemmed Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
title_sort Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
author Oliveira, S. E. H.
author_facet Oliveira, S. E. H.
Carvalho, H.
Esteves, F.
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, H.
Esteves, F.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, S. E. H.
Carvalho, H.
Esteves, F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv WHOQOL-Bref
Quality of life
Mental illness
Confirmatory factor analysis
Psychometrics
topic WHOQOL-Bref
Quality of life
Mental illness
Confirmatory factor analysis
Psychometrics
description Purpose: The current study sought to explore the factor structure of the WHOQOL-Bref in a sample of adults with mental illness. Methods: The study sample consisted of 403 participants recruited from inpatients and outpatients mental health care facilities. Factorial construct validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency of domains was performed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: While four of the five factors were conceptually similar to the original WHOQOL-Bref, our results suggest an alternative 5-domain model (psychological, physical, socialrelationships, environment and level of independence) with good-fit and adequate internal consistency. Thus, the level of independence domain was added to the four domains of the WHOQOL-Bref, since it demonstrates to be a theoretical autonomous domain, as proposed by the WHOQOL-100. Conclusions: The WHOQOL-Bref has shown to be an appropriate measure for the assessment of QOL in psychiatric samples; thus, a valuable tool to be incorporated as part of the routine clinical evaluation and monitoring, as well as an important indicator of treatment outcome and research. Our findings suggest a conceptual distinction between the physical health domain and level of independence in this short version of the WHOQOL. Meanwhile, although additional challenges are posed regarding the dimensionality of the WHOQOL-Bref, future research should reexamine the construct validity of this instrument in other samples of psychiatric consumers.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2016
2017-01-13T15:59:32Z
2019-04-10T14:42:25Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12350
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12350
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0165-1781
10.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134832914071552