Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bennett, Karen
Data de Publicação: 2011
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/5850
Resumo: This chapter uses Tönnies’ notions of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft to examine the issue of plagiarism from a culturalist perspective. According to this, plagiarism is understood not as a universal or unequivocal evil, but as one component of a particular ethical system that took hold within a specific historical and social context, roughly contemporary with the European Enlightenment. Today, that ethical framework is so deeply entrenched in the power structures of the modern world that its values go largely unquestioned in countries at the centre of the world economic system. However, as we move away from the centre towards the periphery, we find that those values become weaker, and may enter into conflict with another moral code, which is usually more traditional in nature, though no less coherent. Indeed, in some parts of the world, it is those traditional values that actually hold sway in local universities, raising serious problems for academic mobility and the internationalization of knowledge. The very concept of plagiarism is also full of inherent contradictions, caused, at least in part, by historical tensions generated by the passage from one kind of society to the other. Vestiges of the Gemeinschaft continue to penetrate all aspects of modern university culture, ranging from teaching practices (the persistence of imitatio in academic writing courses) and hierarchical relations (the power balance inherent in the tutor/student dynamic) to the very philosophy of knowledge underlying modern science (where the rhetorical implications of the citation procedure sit uncomfortably alongside a metadiscourse of transcendental truth). Hence, this chapter argues that, in a context of increased globalization, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the various dynamics at work in this complex concept.
id RCAP_7d346962698cb4ca4afbffdfdd1f646d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/5850
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic PlagiarismPlagiarismGemeinschaftGesellschaftSemi-peripheryPeripheryAcademic WritingThis chapter uses Tönnies’ notions of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft to examine the issue of plagiarism from a culturalist perspective. According to this, plagiarism is understood not as a universal or unequivocal evil, but as one component of a particular ethical system that took hold within a specific historical and social context, roughly contemporary with the European Enlightenment. Today, that ethical framework is so deeply entrenched in the power structures of the modern world that its values go largely unquestioned in countries at the centre of the world economic system. However, as we move away from the centre towards the periphery, we find that those values become weaker, and may enter into conflict with another moral code, which is usually more traditional in nature, though no less coherent. Indeed, in some parts of the world, it is those traditional values that actually hold sway in local universities, raising serious problems for academic mobility and the internationalization of knowledge. The very concept of plagiarism is also full of inherent contradictions, caused, at least in part, by historical tensions generated by the passage from one kind of society to the other. Vestiges of the Gemeinschaft continue to penetrate all aspects of modern university culture, ranging from teaching practices (the persistence of imitatio in academic writing courses) and hierarchical relations (the power balance inherent in the tutor/student dynamic) to the very philosophy of knowledge underlying modern science (where the rhetorical implications of the citation procedure sit uncomfortably alongside a metadiscourse of transcendental truth). Hence, this chapter argues that, in a context of increased globalization, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the various dynamics at work in this complex concept.Lit VerlagRepositório da Universidade de LisboaBennett, Karen2012-04-03T10:52:28Z20112011-01-01T00:00:00Zbook partinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/5850engBennett, Karen. 2011. ‘Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism’ in Thomas Rommel (ed.) Plagiate - Gefahr für die Wissenschaft? Berlin: Lit Verlag. 53-69978-3-643-11254-5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-11-20T17:07:59Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/5850Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-11-20T17:07:59Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism
title Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism
spellingShingle Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism
Bennett, Karen
Plagiarism
Gemeinschaft
Gesellschaft
Semi-periphery
Periphery
Academic Writing
title_short Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism
title_full Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism
title_fullStr Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism
title_full_unstemmed Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism
title_sort Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism
author Bennett, Karen
author_facet Bennett, Karen
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bennett, Karen
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plagiarism
Gemeinschaft
Gesellschaft
Semi-periphery
Periphery
Academic Writing
topic Plagiarism
Gemeinschaft
Gesellschaft
Semi-periphery
Periphery
Academic Writing
description This chapter uses Tönnies’ notions of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft to examine the issue of plagiarism from a culturalist perspective. According to this, plagiarism is understood not as a universal or unequivocal evil, but as one component of a particular ethical system that took hold within a specific historical and social context, roughly contemporary with the European Enlightenment. Today, that ethical framework is so deeply entrenched in the power structures of the modern world that its values go largely unquestioned in countries at the centre of the world economic system. However, as we move away from the centre towards the periphery, we find that those values become weaker, and may enter into conflict with another moral code, which is usually more traditional in nature, though no less coherent. Indeed, in some parts of the world, it is those traditional values that actually hold sway in local universities, raising serious problems for academic mobility and the internationalization of knowledge. The very concept of plagiarism is also full of inherent contradictions, caused, at least in part, by historical tensions generated by the passage from one kind of society to the other. Vestiges of the Gemeinschaft continue to penetrate all aspects of modern university culture, ranging from teaching practices (the persistence of imitatio in academic writing courses) and hierarchical relations (the power balance inherent in the tutor/student dynamic) to the very philosophy of knowledge underlying modern science (where the rhetorical implications of the citation procedure sit uncomfortably alongside a metadiscourse of transcendental truth). Hence, this chapter argues that, in a context of increased globalization, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the various dynamics at work in this complex concept.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2012-04-03T10:52:28Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv book part
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/5850
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/5850
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bennett, Karen. 2011. ‘Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: The Geopolitics of Academic Plagiarism’ in Thomas Rommel (ed.) Plagiate - Gefahr für die Wissenschaft? Berlin: Lit Verlag. 53-69
978-3-643-11254-5
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lit Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lit Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817548765576298496