Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schapals, Aljosha Karim
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bruns, Axel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5401
Resumo: The “fake news” phenomenon has permeated academic scholarship and popular debate since the 2016 US presidential election. Much has been written on the circulation of “fake news” and other forms of mis- and disinformation online. Despite its ongoing proliferation, less effort has been made to better understand the work of those engaged in daily news production—journalists themselves. Funded by the Australian Research Council project Journalism Beyond the Crisis, this study investigates how journalists perceive and respond to this phenomenon at a time when the industry has come under significant attack, and trust in news media has fallen globally. To do so, it draws on in-depth interviews with journalists in Australia and the UK, providing topical insights on their perceptions of and reactions to this profoundly delegitimising force. While on one hand, our findings show journalists expressing significant concern about the rise of “fake news,” they also proactively seek—and, in some cases, implement—deliberate counterstrategies to defend their profession. These strategies range from discursive means—such as stressing and re-asserting journalists’ professional authority and legitimacy—to tangible measures at an organisational level, including newsroom diversity and increased transparency in the news production process.
id RCAP_7e8cb45ed5cc8db3bf8986b5f7a04ef7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5401
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Forcefact-checking; fake news; journalism; misinformation; news verification; objectivity; professional roles; Trump electionThe “fake news” phenomenon has permeated academic scholarship and popular debate since the 2016 US presidential election. Much has been written on the circulation of “fake news” and other forms of mis- and disinformation online. Despite its ongoing proliferation, less effort has been made to better understand the work of those engaged in daily news production—journalists themselves. Funded by the Australian Research Council project Journalism Beyond the Crisis, this study investigates how journalists perceive and respond to this phenomenon at a time when the industry has come under significant attack, and trust in news media has fallen globally. To do so, it draws on in-depth interviews with journalists in Australia and the UK, providing topical insights on their perceptions of and reactions to this profoundly delegitimising force. While on one hand, our findings show journalists expressing significant concern about the rise of “fake news,” they also proactively seek—and, in some cases, implement—deliberate counterstrategies to defend their profession. These strategies range from discursive means—such as stressing and re-asserting journalists’ professional authority and legitimacy—to tangible measures at an organisational level, including newsroom diversity and increased transparency in the news production process.Cogitatio2022-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5401oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5401Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Journalism, Activism, and Social Media: Exploring the Shifts in Journalistic Roles, Performance, and Interconnectedness; 5-162183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5401https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5401https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5401/5401Copyright (c) 2022 Aljosha Karim Schapals, Axel Brunsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchapals, Aljosha KarimBruns, Axel2022-12-20T10:57:47Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5401Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:30.529919Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force
title Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force
spellingShingle Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force
Schapals, Aljosha Karim
fact-checking; fake news; journalism; misinformation; news verification; objectivity; professional roles; Trump election
title_short Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force
title_full Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force
title_fullStr Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force
title_full_unstemmed Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force
title_sort Responding to “Fake News”: Journalistic Perceptions of and Reactions to a Delegitimising Force
author Schapals, Aljosha Karim
author_facet Schapals, Aljosha Karim
Bruns, Axel
author_role author
author2 Bruns, Axel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schapals, Aljosha Karim
Bruns, Axel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv fact-checking; fake news; journalism; misinformation; news verification; objectivity; professional roles; Trump election
topic fact-checking; fake news; journalism; misinformation; news verification; objectivity; professional roles; Trump election
description The “fake news” phenomenon has permeated academic scholarship and popular debate since the 2016 US presidential election. Much has been written on the circulation of “fake news” and other forms of mis- and disinformation online. Despite its ongoing proliferation, less effort has been made to better understand the work of those engaged in daily news production—journalists themselves. Funded by the Australian Research Council project Journalism Beyond the Crisis, this study investigates how journalists perceive and respond to this phenomenon at a time when the industry has come under significant attack, and trust in news media has fallen globally. To do so, it draws on in-depth interviews with journalists in Australia and the UK, providing topical insights on their perceptions of and reactions to this profoundly delegitimising force. While on one hand, our findings show journalists expressing significant concern about the rise of “fake news,” they also proactively seek—and, in some cases, implement—deliberate counterstrategies to defend their profession. These strategies range from discursive means—such as stressing and re-asserting journalists’ professional authority and legitimacy—to tangible measures at an organisational level, including newsroom diversity and increased transparency in the news production process.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5401
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5401
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5401
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5401
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5401
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5401/5401
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Aljosha Karim Schapals, Axel Bruns
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Aljosha Karim Schapals, Axel Bruns
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Journalism, Activism, and Social Media: Exploring the Shifts in Journalistic Roles, Performance, and Interconnectedness; 5-16
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130653426450433