Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34632/gaudiumsciendi.2017.2943 |
Resumo: | Hipparchusis a Platonic dialogue that begins abruptly with the question: "what is the love of profit, who are the profiteers?". It shows how Socrates defies conventions and seeks the root of Greek traditional ethics. Socrates dialogues with a fellow Athenian who believes that the love of profit deserves censure; he questions the young, forcing him to review his own principles and, finally, leaves him perplexed. The reference to Hipparchus comes as a detour in the dialogue. Hipparchus was the son of tyrant Pisistratus, but Socrates argues that the tyranny of Hipparchus was in fact benign and wise; that he was in fact trying to educate his fellow citizens, leading them to admire his superior wisdom. The long praise of Hipparchus is poisonous: the supposed rehabilitation reinforces the negative impression on the reader, but no one is surprised that Socrates was convicted of corrupting the youth by encouraging disrespect of moral traditions of the city. The text conveys, therefore, the "popular" vision of Socrates, which ultimately leads to his conviction. |
id |
RCAP_7fbcab4c783704dd7368b1107947bdee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2943 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tiraniaHipparchusis a Platonic dialogue that begins abruptly with the question: "what is the love of profit, who are the profiteers?". It shows how Socrates defies conventions and seeks the root of Greek traditional ethics. Socrates dialogues with a fellow Athenian who believes that the love of profit deserves censure; he questions the young, forcing him to review his own principles and, finally, leaves him perplexed. The reference to Hipparchus comes as a detour in the dialogue. Hipparchus was the son of tyrant Pisistratus, but Socrates argues that the tyranny of Hipparchus was in fact benign and wise; that he was in fact trying to educate his fellow citizens, leading them to admire his superior wisdom. The long praise of Hipparchus is poisonous: the supposed rehabilitation reinforces the negative impression on the reader, but no one is surprised that Socrates was convicted of corrupting the youth by encouraging disrespect of moral traditions of the city. The text conveys, therefore, the "popular" vision of Socrates, which ultimately leads to his conviction.Hiparco é um diálogo atribuído a Platão que começa abruptamente com uma das habituais questões socráticas: "Oque é o amor do lucro?". Mostra o modo como Sócrates desafia as convenções e busca a base da ética tradicional. No Hiparco, Sócrates conversa com um companheiro ateniense que defende que o amor do lucro merece censura; questiona o jovem, forçando-o a rever os seus princípios e finalmente deixa-o perplexo. A referência a Hiparco surge como por acaso no meio do diálogo. Hiparco era filho do tirano Pisístrato, mas Sócrates defende que a tirania de Hiparco era na verdade benigna e sábia, que este mais não fez que tentar educar os seus concidadãos, levando-os a admirar a sua superior sabedoria. O longo louvor de Hiparco é venenoso: a suposta reabilitação reforça no leitor a impressão negativa, mas ninguém se surpreende de que Sócrates tenha sido condenado por corromper os jovens incentivando o desrespeito das tradições morais da cidade. Os textos transmitem, portanto, a visão "popular" de Sócrates que levaria, finalmente, à sua condenação.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2017-01-01T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/gaudiumsciendi.2017.2943oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2943Gaudium Sciendi; No 11 (2017); 53-79Gaudium Sciendi; n. 11 (2017); 53-792182-760510.34632/gaudiumsciendi.2017.n11reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gaudiumsciendi/article/view/2943https://doi.org/10.34632/gaudiumsciendi.2017.2943https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gaudiumsciendi/article/view/2943/2844Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 José A. Colenhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColen, José A.2022-09-20T11:32:35Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2943Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:49:32.486906Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania |
title |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania |
spellingShingle |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania Colen, José A. |
title_short |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania |
title_full |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania |
title_fullStr |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania |
title_sort |
Hiparco atribuído a Platão e a natureza da tirania |
author |
Colen, José A. |
author_facet |
Colen, José A. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Colen, José A. |
description |
Hipparchusis a Platonic dialogue that begins abruptly with the question: "what is the love of profit, who are the profiteers?". It shows how Socrates defies conventions and seeks the root of Greek traditional ethics. Socrates dialogues with a fellow Athenian who believes that the love of profit deserves censure; he questions the young, forcing him to review his own principles and, finally, leaves him perplexed. The reference to Hipparchus comes as a detour in the dialogue. Hipparchus was the son of tyrant Pisistratus, but Socrates argues that the tyranny of Hipparchus was in fact benign and wise; that he was in fact trying to educate his fellow citizens, leading them to admire his superior wisdom. The long praise of Hipparchus is poisonous: the supposed rehabilitation reinforces the negative impression on the reader, but no one is surprised that Socrates was convicted of corrupting the youth by encouraging disrespect of moral traditions of the city. The text conveys, therefore, the "popular" vision of Socrates, which ultimately leads to his conviction. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34632/gaudiumsciendi.2017.2943 oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2943 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34632/gaudiumsciendi.2017.2943 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2943 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gaudiumsciendi/article/view/2943 https://doi.org/10.34632/gaudiumsciendi.2017.2943 https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/gaudiumsciendi/article/view/2943/2844 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 José A. Colen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 José A. Colen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gaudium Sciendi; No 11 (2017); 53-79 Gaudium Sciendi; n. 11 (2017); 53-79 2182-7605 10.34632/gaudiumsciendi.2017.n11 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130360141840384 |