Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antoni Casasempere-Satorres
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: María Luisa Vercher-Ferrándiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257
Resumo: The review process of the literature is a complex part of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research, developed throughout the entire investigation, from the formulation of the study problem, through the improvement of a conceptual framework to the rise of the discussion or theoretical dialogue. The objective of this paper is to offer an innovative procedure that facilitates a systematic review of the literature in qualitative research based on a methodologically structured analytical process, documentary analysis, and supported by the technical possibilities offered by computer tools such as Mendeley or MAXQDA. The methodological procedure of the Bibliographic Documentary Analysis includes the support to the development of the purpose of the investigation by establishing the investigative limits of the study, facilitating the elaboration of a conceptual framework by allowing the articulation of indicators based on concepts and the development of the study discussion or theoretical dialogue. The result is the smooth integration of documentary material into a database with the support of paraphrase, strategy to summarize data and develop analytical categories. The procedure has been successfully tested in different investigations providing greater clarity to the process of reviewing the literature in qualitative research.
id RCAP_80f30d257dbfe6fa08fed5d68fe66273
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/44
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative researchAnálisis documental bibliográfico. Obteniendo el máximo rendimiento a la revisión de la literatura en investigaciones cualitativasLiterature Review; Documentary Analysis; Mendeley; MAXQDA; Paraphrases.Revisión Literatura; Análisis Documental; Mendeley; MAXQDA; Paráfrasis.The review process of the literature is a complex part of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research, developed throughout the entire investigation, from the formulation of the study problem, through the improvement of a conceptual framework to the rise of the discussion or theoretical dialogue. The objective of this paper is to offer an innovative procedure that facilitates a systematic review of the literature in qualitative research based on a methodologically structured analytical process, documentary analysis, and supported by the technical possibilities offered by computer tools such as Mendeley or MAXQDA. The methodological procedure of the Bibliographic Documentary Analysis includes the support to the development of the purpose of the investigation by establishing the investigative limits of the study, facilitating the elaboration of a conceptual framework by allowing the articulation of indicators based on concepts and the development of the study discussion or theoretical dialogue. The result is the smooth integration of documentary material into a database with the support of paraphrase, strategy to summarize data and develop analytical categories. The procedure has been successfully tested in different investigations providing greater clarity to the process of reviewing the literature in qualitative research.El proceso de revisión de la literatura es una parte compleja de las investigaciones cualitativas, cuantitativas y mixtas desarrollándose a lo largo de toda la investigación, desde la formulación del problema del estudio, pasando por la elaboración de un marco conceptual hasta el desarrollo de la discusión o diálogo teorético. El objetivo del presente trabajo se centra en ofrecer un procedimiento innovador que facilita una revisión sistemática de la literatura en investigaciones cualitativas basada en un proceso analítico metodológicamente estructurado, análisis documental, y apoyado por las posibilidades técnicas que ofrecen las herramientas informáticas como Mendeley o MAXQDA. El procedimiento metodológico de Análisis Documental Bibliográfico sirve como soporte al desarrollo del propósito de la investigación al establecer los límites investigadores del estudio, propicia la elaboración de un marco conceptual al permitir la articulación de indicadores a partir de conceptos y facilita el desarrollo de la discusión del estudio o diálogo teorético. El resultado es la fluida integración del material documental en una base de datos que sirve de apoyo a las paráfrasis resultantes siendo ésta una estrategia para resumir datos y elaborar categorías analíticas. El procedimiento se ha probado exitosamente en diferentes investigaciones aportando una mayor claridad al proceso de revisión de la literatura en investigaciones cualitativas.Ludomedia2020-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: advances and challenges; 247-257New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales: avances y desafíos; 247-257New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios; 247-2572184-777010.36367/ntqr.4.2020reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPspahttps://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/44https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/44/38Antoni Casasempere-SatorresMaría Luisa Vercher-Ferrándizinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-08-13T09:12:03Zoai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/44Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:47:54.690048Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research
Análisis documental bibliográfico. Obteniendo el máximo rendimiento a la revisión de la literatura en investigaciones cualitativas
title Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research
spellingShingle Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research
Antoni Casasempere-Satorres
Literature Review; Documentary Analysis; Mendeley; MAXQDA; Paraphrases.
Revisión Literatura; Análisis Documental; Mendeley; MAXQDA; Paráfrasis.
title_short Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research
title_full Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research
title_fullStr Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research
title_full_unstemmed Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research
title_sort Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research
author Antoni Casasempere-Satorres
author_facet Antoni Casasempere-Satorres
María Luisa Vercher-Ferrándiz
author_role author
author2 María Luisa Vercher-Ferrándiz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antoni Casasempere-Satorres
María Luisa Vercher-Ferrándiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Literature Review; Documentary Analysis; Mendeley; MAXQDA; Paraphrases.
Revisión Literatura; Análisis Documental; Mendeley; MAXQDA; Paráfrasis.
topic Literature Review; Documentary Analysis; Mendeley; MAXQDA; Paraphrases.
Revisión Literatura; Análisis Documental; Mendeley; MAXQDA; Paráfrasis.
description The review process of the literature is a complex part of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research, developed throughout the entire investigation, from the formulation of the study problem, through the improvement of a conceptual framework to the rise of the discussion or theoretical dialogue. The objective of this paper is to offer an innovative procedure that facilitates a systematic review of the literature in qualitative research based on a methodologically structured analytical process, documentary analysis, and supported by the technical possibilities offered by computer tools such as Mendeley or MAXQDA. The methodological procedure of the Bibliographic Documentary Analysis includes the support to the development of the purpose of the investigation by establishing the investigative limits of the study, facilitating the elaboration of a conceptual framework by allowing the articulation of indicators based on concepts and the development of the study discussion or theoretical dialogue. The result is the smooth integration of documentary material into a database with the support of paraphrase, strategy to summarize data and develop analytical categories. The procedure has been successfully tested in different investigations providing greater clarity to the process of reviewing the literature in qualitative research.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257
url https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/44
https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/44/38
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: advances and challenges; 247-257
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales: avances y desafíos; 247-257
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios; 247-257
2184-7770
10.36367/ntqr.4.2020
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130346288054272

Registros relacionados