Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schütte, Beatrice
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Majewski, Lotta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741
Resumo: Artificial intelligence (AI) is an integral part of our everyday lives, able to perform a multitude of tasks with little to no human intervention. The number of devices with integrated digital features on the market, including consumer products, is constantly increasing. Many legal issues related to this phenomenon have not been comprehensively addressed or resolved yet. Also, the question arises whether the existing legal rules on damages liability can resolve cases involving AI so as to make case outcomes predictable across the Union. The EU institutions are in the process of evaluating if and to what extent new legislation regarding AI is needed, envisioning a European approach to avoid fragmentation of the Single Market. This article critically analyses the most relevant preparatory documents and proposals with regard to civil liability for AI issued by EU legislators. Moreover, it is crucial to clarify the applicability of existing EU legislation such as the framework concerning product safety and product liability to new technologies. To achieve a more predictable framework for the future, the legislation applicable to AI must be aligned and it must be evident which rules are applicable in which situation. The envisioned level playing field throughout the Single Market justifies harmonisation of many aspects of damages liability for AI-related harm. In the process, particular AI characteristics should be carefully considered in terms of questions such as causation, fault, and the burden of proof.
id RCAP_81a388164a3dcd5bcf05b3cbb18d5661
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single MarketArtificial intelligence (AI) is an integral part of our everyday lives, able to perform a multitude of tasks with little to no human intervention. The number of devices with integrated digital features on the market, including consumer products, is constantly increasing. Many legal issues related to this phenomenon have not been comprehensively addressed or resolved yet. Also, the question arises whether the existing legal rules on damages liability can resolve cases involving AI so as to make case outcomes predictable across the Union. The EU institutions are in the process of evaluating if and to what extent new legislation regarding AI is needed, envisioning a European approach to avoid fragmentation of the Single Market. This article critically analyses the most relevant preparatory documents and proposals with regard to civil liability for AI issued by EU legislators. Moreover, it is crucial to clarify the applicability of existing EU legislation such as the framework concerning product safety and product liability to new technologies. To achieve a more predictable framework for the future, the legislation applicable to AI must be aligned and it must be evident which rules are applicable in which situation. The envisioned level playing field throughout the Single Market justifies harmonisation of many aspects of damages liability for AI-related harm. In the process, particular AI characteristics should be carefully considered in terms of questions such as causation, fault, and the burden of proof.Universidade Católica Editora2022-03-23T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 6 No 1 (2022); 123-159Market and Competition Law Review; v. 6 n. 1 (2022); 123-1592184-000810.34632/mclawreview.2022.6.1reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10741https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10741/11051Copyright (c) 2022 Beatrice Schütte; Lotta Majewskihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchütte, BeatriceMajewski, Lotta2022-09-23T15:10:28Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:03:43.544983Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
title Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
spellingShingle Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
Schütte, Beatrice
title_short Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
title_full Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
title_fullStr Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
title_full_unstemmed Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
title_sort Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
author Schütte, Beatrice
author_facet Schütte, Beatrice
Majewski, Lotta
author_role author
author2 Majewski, Lotta
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schütte, Beatrice
Majewski, Lotta
description Artificial intelligence (AI) is an integral part of our everyday lives, able to perform a multitude of tasks with little to no human intervention. The number of devices with integrated digital features on the market, including consumer products, is constantly increasing. Many legal issues related to this phenomenon have not been comprehensively addressed or resolved yet. Also, the question arises whether the existing legal rules on damages liability can resolve cases involving AI so as to make case outcomes predictable across the Union. The EU institutions are in the process of evaluating if and to what extent new legislation regarding AI is needed, envisioning a European approach to avoid fragmentation of the Single Market. This article critically analyses the most relevant preparatory documents and proposals with regard to civil liability for AI issued by EU legislators. Moreover, it is crucial to clarify the applicability of existing EU legislation such as the framework concerning product safety and product liability to new technologies. To achieve a more predictable framework for the future, the legislation applicable to AI must be aligned and it must be evident which rules are applicable in which situation. The envisioned level playing field throughout the Single Market justifies harmonisation of many aspects of damages liability for AI-related harm. In the process, particular AI characteristics should be carefully considered in terms of questions such as causation, fault, and the burden of proof.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-23T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741
url https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10741
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10741/11051
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Beatrice Schütte; Lotta Majewski
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Beatrice Schütte; Lotta Majewski
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 6 No 1 (2022); 123-159
Market and Competition Law Review; v. 6 n. 1 (2022); 123-159
2184-0008
10.34632/mclawreview.2022.6.1
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130500707647488