Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741 |
Resumo: | Artificial intelligence (AI) is an integral part of our everyday lives, able to perform a multitude of tasks with little to no human intervention. The number of devices with integrated digital features on the market, including consumer products, is constantly increasing. Many legal issues related to this phenomenon have not been comprehensively addressed or resolved yet. Also, the question arises whether the existing legal rules on damages liability can resolve cases involving AI so as to make case outcomes predictable across the Union. The EU institutions are in the process of evaluating if and to what extent new legislation regarding AI is needed, envisioning a European approach to avoid fragmentation of the Single Market. This article critically analyses the most relevant preparatory documents and proposals with regard to civil liability for AI issued by EU legislators. Moreover, it is crucial to clarify the applicability of existing EU legislation such as the framework concerning product safety and product liability to new technologies. To achieve a more predictable framework for the future, the legislation applicable to AI must be aligned and it must be evident which rules are applicable in which situation. The envisioned level playing field throughout the Single Market justifies harmonisation of many aspects of damages liability for AI-related harm. In the process, particular AI characteristics should be carefully considered in terms of questions such as causation, fault, and the burden of proof. |
id |
RCAP_81a388164a3dcd5bcf05b3cbb18d5661 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single MarketArtificial intelligence (AI) is an integral part of our everyday lives, able to perform a multitude of tasks with little to no human intervention. The number of devices with integrated digital features on the market, including consumer products, is constantly increasing. Many legal issues related to this phenomenon have not been comprehensively addressed or resolved yet. Also, the question arises whether the existing legal rules on damages liability can resolve cases involving AI so as to make case outcomes predictable across the Union. The EU institutions are in the process of evaluating if and to what extent new legislation regarding AI is needed, envisioning a European approach to avoid fragmentation of the Single Market. This article critically analyses the most relevant preparatory documents and proposals with regard to civil liability for AI issued by EU legislators. Moreover, it is crucial to clarify the applicability of existing EU legislation such as the framework concerning product safety and product liability to new technologies. To achieve a more predictable framework for the future, the legislation applicable to AI must be aligned and it must be evident which rules are applicable in which situation. The envisioned level playing field throughout the Single Market justifies harmonisation of many aspects of damages liability for AI-related harm. In the process, particular AI characteristics should be carefully considered in terms of questions such as causation, fault, and the burden of proof.Universidade Católica Editora2022-03-23T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 6 No 1 (2022); 123-159Market and Competition Law Review; v. 6 n. 1 (2022); 123-1592184-000810.34632/mclawreview.2022.6.1reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10741https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10741/11051Copyright (c) 2022 Beatrice Schütte; Lotta Majewskihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchütte, BeatriceMajewski, Lotta2022-09-23T15:10:28Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:03:43.544983Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market |
title |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market |
spellingShingle |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market Schütte, Beatrice |
title_short |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market |
title_full |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market |
title_fullStr |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market |
title_full_unstemmed |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market |
title_sort |
Private Liability for AI-Related Harm: Towards More Predictable Rules for the Single Market |
author |
Schütte, Beatrice |
author_facet |
Schütte, Beatrice Majewski, Lotta |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Majewski, Lotta |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schütte, Beatrice Majewski, Lotta |
description |
Artificial intelligence (AI) is an integral part of our everyday lives, able to perform a multitude of tasks with little to no human intervention. The number of devices with integrated digital features on the market, including consumer products, is constantly increasing. Many legal issues related to this phenomenon have not been comprehensively addressed or resolved yet. Also, the question arises whether the existing legal rules on damages liability can resolve cases involving AI so as to make case outcomes predictable across the Union. The EU institutions are in the process of evaluating if and to what extent new legislation regarding AI is needed, envisioning a European approach to avoid fragmentation of the Single Market. This article critically analyses the most relevant preparatory documents and proposals with regard to civil liability for AI issued by EU legislators. Moreover, it is crucial to clarify the applicability of existing EU legislation such as the framework concerning product safety and product liability to new technologies. To achieve a more predictable framework for the future, the legislation applicable to AI must be aligned and it must be evident which rules are applicable in which situation. The envisioned level playing field throughout the Single Market justifies harmonisation of many aspects of damages liability for AI-related harm. In the process, particular AI characteristics should be carefully considered in terms of questions such as causation, fault, and the burden of proof. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-23T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741 oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10741 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10741 https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2022.10741 https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10741/11051 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Beatrice Schütte; Lotta Majewski http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Beatrice Schütte; Lotta Majewski http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Editora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Editora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 6 No 1 (2022); 123-159 Market and Competition Law Review; v. 6 n. 1 (2022); 123-159 2184-0008 10.34632/mclawreview.2022.6.1 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130500707647488 |