Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duarte, C
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Ferreira, R, Mackie, SL, Kirwan, JR, Pereira da Silva, JA
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/1971
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To identify the instruments used to assess polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) in published studies. METHODS: A systematic literature review of clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies related to PMR, published from 1970 to 2014, was carried out. All outcome and assessment instruments were extracted and categorized according to core areas and domains, as defined by the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) Filter 2.0. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles (3221 patients) were included: 12 randomized controlled trials (RCT); 3 nonrandomized trials; and 20 observational studies. More than 20 domains were identified, measured by 29 different instruments. The most frequently used measures were pain, morning stiffness, patient global assessment and physician global assessment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. The definition of outcomes varied considerably between studies. CONCLUSION: The outcome measures and instruments used in PMR are numerous and diversely defined. The establishment of a core set of validated and standardized outcome measurements is needed.
id RCAP_81e97e083f6e3a86d8a4084c49d57a64
oai_identifier_str oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/1971
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Reviewvaliação de ResultadosPolimialgia ReumáticaFemaleOBJECTIVE: To identify the instruments used to assess polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) in published studies. METHODS: A systematic literature review of clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies related to PMR, published from 1970 to 2014, was carried out. All outcome and assessment instruments were extracted and categorized according to core areas and domains, as defined by the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) Filter 2.0. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles (3221 patients) were included: 12 randomized controlled trials (RCT); 3 nonrandomized trials; and 20 observational studies. More than 20 domains were identified, measured by 29 different instruments. The most frequently used measures were pain, morning stiffness, patient global assessment and physician global assessment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. The definition of outcomes varied considerably between studies. CONCLUSION: The outcome measures and instruments used in PMR are numerous and diversely defined. The establishment of a core set of validated and standardized outcome measurements is needed.RIHUCDuarte, CFerreira, RMackie, SLKirwan, JRPereira da Silva, JA2016-10-26T15:20:27Z2015-122015-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/1971engJ Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;42(12):2503-11.10.3899/jrheum.150515info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:23:16Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/1971Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:04:24.785422Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review
title Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review
spellingShingle Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review
Duarte, C
valiação de Resultados
Polimialgia Reumática
Female
title_short Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review
title_full Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review
title_sort Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review
author Duarte, C
author_facet Duarte, C
Ferreira, R
Mackie, SL
Kirwan, JR
Pereira da Silva, JA
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, R
Mackie, SL
Kirwan, JR
Pereira da Silva, JA
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RIHUC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte, C
Ferreira, R
Mackie, SL
Kirwan, JR
Pereira da Silva, JA
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv valiação de Resultados
Polimialgia Reumática
Female
topic valiação de Resultados
Polimialgia Reumática
Female
description OBJECTIVE: To identify the instruments used to assess polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) in published studies. METHODS: A systematic literature review of clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies related to PMR, published from 1970 to 2014, was carried out. All outcome and assessment instruments were extracted and categorized according to core areas and domains, as defined by the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) Filter 2.0. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles (3221 patients) were included: 12 randomized controlled trials (RCT); 3 nonrandomized trials; and 20 observational studies. More than 20 domains were identified, measured by 29 different instruments. The most frequently used measures were pain, morning stiffness, patient global assessment and physician global assessment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. The definition of outcomes varied considerably between studies. CONCLUSION: The outcome measures and instruments used in PMR are numerous and diversely defined. The establishment of a core set of validated and standardized outcome measurements is needed.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12
2015-12-01T00:00:00Z
2016-10-26T15:20:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/1971
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/1971
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;42(12):2503-11.
10.3899/jrheum.150515
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131706813317120