Characterization of biofilm formation on a humic material

• Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, A. L.
• Data de Publicação: 2008
• Outros Autores: Brito, A. G., Janknecht, P., Silva, J., Machado, A. V., Nogueira, R.
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/8355
• topic: Humic material; Biofilm; Flowcell; Community composition; FTIR; Science & Technology

Biofilms are major sites of carbon cycling in streams. Therefore, it is crucial to improve knowledge about biofilms’ structure and microbial composition to understand their contribution in the self-purification of surface water. The present work intends to study biofilm formation in the presence of humic substances (HSs) as a carbon source. Two biofilm flowcells were operated in parallel; one with synthetic stream water, displaying a background carbon concentration of 1.26 ± 0.84 mg L−1, the other with added HSs and an overall carbon concentration of 9.68 ± 1.00 mg L−1. From the biofilms’ results of culturable and total countable cells, it can be concluded that the presence of HSs did not significantly enhance the biofilm cell density. However, the biofilm formed in the presence of HSs presented slightly higher values of volatile suspended solids (VSS) and protein. One possible explanation for this result is that HSs adsorbed to the polymeric matrix of the biofilm and were included in the quantification of VSS and protein. The microbial composition of the biofilm with addition of HSs was characterized by the presence of bacteria belonging to beta-Proteobacteria, Cupriavidus metallidurans and several species of the genus Ralstonia were identified, and gamma-Proteobacteria, represented by Escherichia coli. In the biofilm formed without HSs addition beta-Proteobacteria, represented by the species Variovorax paradoxus, and bacteria belonging to the group Bacteroidetes were detected. In conclusion, the presence of HSs did not significantly enhance biofilm cell density but influenced the bacterial diversity in the biofilm.