The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Juola, Patrick
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/6118
Resumo: A key step forward in the professionalization of forensic science is the  development of standards of practice and protocols. Based on his analysis of the Rowling case, Juola (2015) proposed a systematic protocol for authorship verifi- cation. We present both a theoretical and an empirical analysis of the accuracy of this protocol. We further present a demonstration of this analysis in terms of a high-profile case of political activism. We show that this protocol produces accurate and understandable analyses of the likelihood of common authorship.
id RCAP_84b0b8ca2d45184fe4dcc0f8f6d7ecc0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/6118
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship AttributionArticlesA key step forward in the professionalization of forensic science is the  development of standards of practice and protocols. Based on his analysis of the Rowling case, Juola (2015) proposed a systematic protocol for authorship verifi- cation. We present both a theoretical and an empirical analysis of the accuracy of this protocol. We further present a demonstration of this analysis in terms of a high-profile case of political activism. We show that this protocol produces accurate and understandable analyses of the likelihood of common authorship.Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto2019-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/6118por2183-3745Juola, Patrickinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-01-13T03:47:37Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/6118Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:31:23.389443Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution
title The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution
spellingShingle The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution
Juola, Patrick
Articles
title_short The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution
title_full The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution
title_fullStr The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution
title_full_unstemmed The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution
title_sort The Rowling Protocol, Steven Bannon, and Rogue POTUS Staff: a Study in Computational Authorship Attribution
author Juola, Patrick
author_facet Juola, Patrick
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Juola, Patrick
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Articles
topic Articles
description A key step forward in the professionalization of forensic science is the  development of standards of practice and protocols. Based on his analysis of the Rowling case, Juola (2015) proposed a systematic protocol for authorship verifi- cation. We present both a theoretical and an empirical analysis of the accuracy of this protocol. We further present a demonstration of this analysis in terms of a high-profile case of political activism. We show that this protocol produces accurate and understandable analyses of the likelihood of common authorship.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/6118
url https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/6118
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-3745
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130768481452032

Registros relacionados