Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/6115 |
Resumo: | The authorship of questioned documents often constitutes important evidence in criminal and civil cases. Linguistic stylistic analysis can often help to determine authorship. Computational methods have been applied to authorship analysis in academia for decades, and in recent years have achieved the levels of reliability needed for application to real-world cases. This article surveys the dierent types of computational authorship analysis methods and their components in a practical vein—describing the assumptions each makes, the analytic controls they require, and the tests needed to measure and ensure their reliability. Specically, I discuss many of the potential pitfalls in their application, to guide practitioners in more eectively achieving trustworthy and understandable results. It must always be remembered, though, that there is no substitute for expertise, experience, and careful human judgment. |
id |
RCAP_e28718c154132447a256f9fbd8fccd99 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/6115 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and PitfallsArticlesThe authorship of questioned documents often constitutes important evidence in criminal and civil cases. Linguistic stylistic analysis can often help to determine authorship. Computational methods have been applied to authorship analysis in academia for decades, and in recent years have achieved the levels of reliability needed for application to real-world cases. This article surveys the dierent types of computational authorship analysis methods and their components in a practical vein—describing the assumptions each makes, the analytic controls they require, and the tests needed to measure and ensure their reliability. Specically, I discuss many of the potential pitfalls in their application, to guide practitioners in more eectively achieving trustworthy and understandable results. It must always be remembered, though, that there is no substitute for expertise, experience, and careful human judgment.Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto2019-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/6115por2183-3745Argamon, Shlomo Engelsoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-01-13T03:47:36Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/6115Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:31:23.258815Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls |
title |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls |
spellingShingle |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls Argamon, Shlomo Engelson Articles |
title_short |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls |
title_full |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls |
title_fullStr |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls |
title_full_unstemmed |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls |
title_sort |
Computational Forensic Authorship Analysis: Promises and Pitfalls |
author |
Argamon, Shlomo Engelson |
author_facet |
Argamon, Shlomo Engelson |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Argamon, Shlomo Engelson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Articles |
topic |
Articles |
description |
The authorship of questioned documents often constitutes important evidence in criminal and civil cases. Linguistic stylistic analysis can often help to determine authorship. Computational methods have been applied to authorship analysis in academia for decades, and in recent years have achieved the levels of reliability needed for application to real-world cases. This article surveys the dierent types of computational authorship analysis methods and their components in a practical vein—describing the assumptions each makes, the analytic controls they require, and the tests needed to measure and ensure their reliability. Specically, I discuss many of the potential pitfalls in their application, to guide practitioners in more eectively achieving trustworthy and understandable results. It must always be remembered, though, that there is no substitute for expertise, experience, and careful human judgment. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/6115 |
url |
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/6115 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2183-3745 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130768478306304 |