Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gomes, Teresa
Publication Date: 2015
Other Authors: Dias, Teresa, Cadavez, Vasco, Andrade, João Verdial, Morais, Jorge Sá, Ramalhosa, Elsa, Estevinho, Leticia M.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/14168
Summary: Mead is a traditional alcoholic beverage obtained by fermenting mead wort; however, its production still remains frequently an empirical exercise. Different meads can be produced, depending on fermentation conditions. Nevertheless, to date few studies have been developed on factors that may influence mead quality. The main objective of this work was to study the influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability. Different meads were produced with two sweetness levels (sweet and dry meads) and three ethanol contents (18, 20, 22% (v/v)), adjusted by brandy addition. Afterwards, meads acceptability was evaluated by sensory analysis through a consumers’ panel (n=108) along with chemical analysis by HPLC-RID of glucose, fructose, ethanol, glycerol and acetic acid. The sweet (75 g glucose+fructose/L) and dry (23 g glucose+fructose/L) meads presented glycerol contents equal to 5.10±0.54 and 5.96±0.95 g/L, respectively, that were desirable since glycerol improves mead quality. Low concentrations of acetic acid were determined (0.46±0.08 and 0.57±0.09 g/L), avoiding the vinegar off-character. Concerning sensory analysis, the alcohol content of mead had no effect on the sensory attributes studied, namely, aroma, sweetness, flavour, alcohol feeling and general appreciation. Regarding sweetness, the “sweet meads” were the most appreciated by the consumers (score of 5.4±2.56), whereas the “dry meads” (score of 2.7±2.23) showed low acceptability. In conclusion, this work revealed that sweetness is a sensory key attribute for mead acceptance by the consumers, whereas ethanol content (18 to 22% (v/v)) is not.
id RCAP_85c1c9c87cc36631dc3cac83115de49e
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/14168
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptabilityMeadSweetnessEthanol contentFermentationsSensory analysisMead is a traditional alcoholic beverage obtained by fermenting mead wort; however, its production still remains frequently an empirical exercise. Different meads can be produced, depending on fermentation conditions. Nevertheless, to date few studies have been developed on factors that may influence mead quality. The main objective of this work was to study the influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability. Different meads were produced with two sweetness levels (sweet and dry meads) and three ethanol contents (18, 20, 22% (v/v)), adjusted by brandy addition. Afterwards, meads acceptability was evaluated by sensory analysis through a consumers’ panel (n=108) along with chemical analysis by HPLC-RID of glucose, fructose, ethanol, glycerol and acetic acid. The sweet (75 g glucose+fructose/L) and dry (23 g glucose+fructose/L) meads presented glycerol contents equal to 5.10±0.54 and 5.96±0.95 g/L, respectively, that were desirable since glycerol improves mead quality. Low concentrations of acetic acid were determined (0.46±0.08 and 0.57±0.09 g/L), avoiding the vinegar off-character. Concerning sensory analysis, the alcohol content of mead had no effect on the sensory attributes studied, namely, aroma, sweetness, flavour, alcohol feeling and general appreciation. Regarding sweetness, the “sweet meads” were the most appreciated by the consumers (score of 5.4±2.56), whereas the “dry meads” (score of 2.7±2.23) showed low acceptability. In conclusion, this work revealed that sweetness is a sensory key attribute for mead acceptance by the consumers, whereas ethanol content (18 to 22% (v/v)) is not.Biblioteca Digital do IPBGomes, TeresaDias, TeresaCadavez, VascoAndrade, João VerdialMorais, Jorge SáRamalhosa, ElsaEstevinho, Leticia M.2017-03-16T09:21:31Z20152015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/14168engGomes, Teresa; Dias, Teresa; Cadavez, Vasco; Verdial, João; Morais, Jorge Sá; Ramalhosa, Elsa; Estevinho, Leticia M. (2016). Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. ISSN 1230-0322. 65:2, p. 137-1421230-032210.1515/pjfns-2015-0006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T10:33:18Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/14168Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:04:03.524465Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability
title Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability
spellingShingle Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability
Gomes, Teresa
Mead
Sweetness
Ethanol content
Fermentations
Sensory analysis
title_short Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability
title_full Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability
title_fullStr Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability
title_full_unstemmed Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability
title_sort Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability
author Gomes, Teresa
author_facet Gomes, Teresa
Dias, Teresa
Cadavez, Vasco
Andrade, João Verdial
Morais, Jorge Sá
Ramalhosa, Elsa
Estevinho, Leticia M.
author_role author
author2 Dias, Teresa
Cadavez, Vasco
Andrade, João Verdial
Morais, Jorge Sá
Ramalhosa, Elsa
Estevinho, Leticia M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Teresa
Dias, Teresa
Cadavez, Vasco
Andrade, João Verdial
Morais, Jorge Sá
Ramalhosa, Elsa
Estevinho, Leticia M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mead
Sweetness
Ethanol content
Fermentations
Sensory analysis
topic Mead
Sweetness
Ethanol content
Fermentations
Sensory analysis
description Mead is a traditional alcoholic beverage obtained by fermenting mead wort; however, its production still remains frequently an empirical exercise. Different meads can be produced, depending on fermentation conditions. Nevertheless, to date few studies have been developed on factors that may influence mead quality. The main objective of this work was to study the influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability. Different meads were produced with two sweetness levels (sweet and dry meads) and three ethanol contents (18, 20, 22% (v/v)), adjusted by brandy addition. Afterwards, meads acceptability was evaluated by sensory analysis through a consumers’ panel (n=108) along with chemical analysis by HPLC-RID of glucose, fructose, ethanol, glycerol and acetic acid. The sweet (75 g glucose+fructose/L) and dry (23 g glucose+fructose/L) meads presented glycerol contents equal to 5.10±0.54 and 5.96±0.95 g/L, respectively, that were desirable since glycerol improves mead quality. Low concentrations of acetic acid were determined (0.46±0.08 and 0.57±0.09 g/L), avoiding the vinegar off-character. Concerning sensory analysis, the alcohol content of mead had no effect on the sensory attributes studied, namely, aroma, sweetness, flavour, alcohol feeling and general appreciation. Regarding sweetness, the “sweet meads” were the most appreciated by the consumers (score of 5.4±2.56), whereas the “dry meads” (score of 2.7±2.23) showed low acceptability. In conclusion, this work revealed that sweetness is a sensory key attribute for mead acceptance by the consumers, whereas ethanol content (18 to 22% (v/v)) is not.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2017-03-16T09:21:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/14168
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/14168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Gomes, Teresa; Dias, Teresa; Cadavez, Vasco; Verdial, João; Morais, Jorge Sá; Ramalhosa, Elsa; Estevinho, Leticia M. (2016). Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. ISSN 1230-0322. 65:2, p. 137-142
1230-0322
10.1515/pjfns-2015-0006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135287085891584