Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Saramago, André
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/28699
Resumo: Norbert Elias frequently describes figurational sociology as an attempt to produce more realitycongruent ‘means of orientation’ that might help people acquire greater ‘control’ over their social processes. This paper addresses the important theme of ‘control’ in figurational sociology by arguing that Elias does not provide a satisfactory justification of why control should be privileged by figurational sociologists as one of the goals of social scientific endeavour, nor does he adequately address the political implications of this normative stance. The paper attempts to clarify Elias’s notion of, and attributed value to, ‘control’, through a reinterpretation of Karl Marx’s work that shows the connection between Marx’s and Elias’s conceptions of science. Finally, the paper argues that figurational sociology can build upon Elias’s work on the involvement and detachment balance in order to develop the resources to more adequately justify the normative value Elias places upon the extension of human ‘control’, and also deal with its political implications.
id RCAP_85d84c91f82619b05d6ad9ac973664d5
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/28699
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational SociologyNorbert Elias; Karl Marx; Means of orientation; Control; Involvement– Detachment balanceNorbert Elias frequently describes figurational sociology as an attempt to produce more realitycongruent ‘means of orientation’ that might help people acquire greater ‘control’ over their social processes. This paper addresses the important theme of ‘control’ in figurational sociology by arguing that Elias does not provide a satisfactory justification of why control should be privileged by figurational sociologists as one of the goals of social scientific endeavour, nor does he adequately address the political implications of this normative stance. The paper attempts to clarify Elias’s notion of, and attributed value to, ‘control’, through a reinterpretation of Karl Marx’s work that shows the connection between Marx’s and Elias’s conceptions of science. Finally, the paper argues that figurational sociology can build upon Elias’s work on the involvement and detachment balance in order to develop the resources to more adequately justify the normative value Elias places upon the extension of human ‘control’, and also deal with its political implications.Repositório da Universidade de LisboaSaramago, André2023-09-21T10:36:32Z2015-032015-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/28699enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-09-24T01:32:23Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/28699Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:54.031130Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology
title Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology
spellingShingle Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology
Saramago, André
Norbert Elias; Karl Marx; Means of orientation; Control; Involvement– Detachment balance
title_short Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology
title_full Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology
title_fullStr Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology
title_full_unstemmed Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology
title_sort Problems of Orientation and Control: Marx, Elias and the Involvement–Detachment Balance in Figurational Sociology
author Saramago, André
author_facet Saramago, André
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Saramago, André
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Norbert Elias; Karl Marx; Means of orientation; Control; Involvement– Detachment balance
topic Norbert Elias; Karl Marx; Means of orientation; Control; Involvement– Detachment balance
description Norbert Elias frequently describes figurational sociology as an attempt to produce more realitycongruent ‘means of orientation’ that might help people acquire greater ‘control’ over their social processes. This paper addresses the important theme of ‘control’ in figurational sociology by arguing that Elias does not provide a satisfactory justification of why control should be privileged by figurational sociologists as one of the goals of social scientific endeavour, nor does he adequately address the political implications of this normative stance. The paper attempts to clarify Elias’s notion of, and attributed value to, ‘control’, through a reinterpretation of Karl Marx’s work that shows the connection between Marx’s and Elias’s conceptions of science. Finally, the paper argues that figurational sociology can build upon Elias’s work on the involvement and detachment balance in order to develop the resources to more adequately justify the normative value Elias places upon the extension of human ‘control’, and also deal with its political implications.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03
2015-03-01T00:00:00Z
2023-09-21T10:36:32Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/28699
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/28699
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133577553641472