Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caetano, António
Data de Publicação: 1996
Outros Autores: Vala, Jorge
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587
Resumo: The social judgeability model states that in order to give a social judgement, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgement is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgements. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgement, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume they have sufficient information to make a social judgement. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower that the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, second group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgements relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability.
id RCAP_87148fde34420ec3acb5229eefdeb8d2
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/587
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeabilityEfeitos do contexto social de interacção na julgabilidade social-The social judgeability model states that in order to give a social judgement, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgement is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgements. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgement, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume they have sufficient information to make a social judgement. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower that the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, second group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgements relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability.O modelo da julgabilidade social afirma que para que um julgamento possa ser realizado, as pessoas necessitam de sentir que estão em posição de julgar. Emitir um julgamento, não é apenas uma questão de integrar informação individual e categorical acerca de um alvo. Depende igualmente da relação que existe entre os  juízes e os seus julgamentos. A partir do contexto pragmático que envolve qualquer julgamento social, os percipientes têm de considerar a validade social desse julgamento, baseando-se nas teorias de que dispõem sobre essa relação. Alguns factores podem promover este sentimento de validade social. De acordo com o modelo de julgabilidade social, um elevado estatuto social pode induzir as pessoas a pensarem que dispõem de informação suficiente para a emissão de um julgamento. Um estudo testando esta hipótese foi conduzido, manipulado o estatuto social dos juízes: mas elevado, igual ou menos elevado do que o alvo. Dois grupos de estudantes participaram neste estudo (primeiro grupo N=63, segundo grupo N=60). Os resultados indicaram que os sujeitos de estatuto mais elevado sentiram-se mais confiantes no seu julgamento do que os outros. Estes resultados são discutidos no âmbito da formação de impressões e da julgabilidade social.Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia1996-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 11 No. 1 (1996); 27-36PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 11 N.º 1 (1996); 27-362183-24710874-2049reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/587https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/587/346Caetano, AntónioVala, Jorgeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-09T12:50:36Zoai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/587Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:10:22.510531Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
Efeitos do contexto social de interacção na julgabilidade social
title Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
spellingShingle Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
Caetano, António
-
title_short Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
title_full Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
title_fullStr Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
title_full_unstemmed Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
title_sort Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
author Caetano, António
author_facet Caetano, António
Vala, Jorge
author_role author
author2 Vala, Jorge
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caetano, António
Vala, Jorge
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv -
topic -
description The social judgeability model states that in order to give a social judgement, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgement is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgements. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgement, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume they have sufficient information to make a social judgement. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower that the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, second group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgements relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability.
publishDate 1996
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1996-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587
https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587
url https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/587
https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/587/346
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 11 No. 1 (1996); 27-36
PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 11 N.º 1 (1996); 27-36
2183-2471
0874-2049
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134657445363712