Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1996 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587 |
Resumo: | The social judgeability model states that in order to give a social judgement, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgement is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgements. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgement, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume they have sufficient information to make a social judgement. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower that the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, second group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgements relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability. |
id |
RCAP_87148fde34420ec3acb5229eefdeb8d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/587 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeabilityEfeitos do contexto social de interacção na julgabilidade social-The social judgeability model states that in order to give a social judgement, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgement is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgements. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgement, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume they have sufficient information to make a social judgement. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower that the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, second group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgements relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability.O modelo da julgabilidade social afirma que para que um julgamento possa ser realizado, as pessoas necessitam de sentir que estão em posição de julgar. Emitir um julgamento, não é apenas uma questão de integrar informação individual e categorical acerca de um alvo. Depende igualmente da relação que existe entre os juízes e os seus julgamentos. A partir do contexto pragmático que envolve qualquer julgamento social, os percipientes têm de considerar a validade social desse julgamento, baseando-se nas teorias de que dispõem sobre essa relação. Alguns factores podem promover este sentimento de validade social. De acordo com o modelo de julgabilidade social, um elevado estatuto social pode induzir as pessoas a pensarem que dispõem de informação suficiente para a emissão de um julgamento. Um estudo testando esta hipótese foi conduzido, manipulado o estatuto social dos juízes: mas elevado, igual ou menos elevado do que o alvo. Dois grupos de estudantes participaram neste estudo (primeiro grupo N=63, segundo grupo N=60). Os resultados indicaram que os sujeitos de estatuto mais elevado sentiram-se mais confiantes no seu julgamento do que os outros. Estes resultados são discutidos no âmbito da formação de impressões e da julgabilidade social.Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia1996-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 11 No. 1 (1996); 27-36PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 11 N.º 1 (1996); 27-362183-24710874-2049reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/587https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/587/346Caetano, AntónioVala, Jorgeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-09T12:50:36Zoai:oai.appsicologia.org:article/587Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:10:22.510531Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability Efeitos do contexto social de interacção na julgabilidade social |
title |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
spellingShingle |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability Caetano, António - |
title_short |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title_full |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title_fullStr |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title_sort |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
author |
Caetano, António |
author_facet |
Caetano, António Vala, Jorge |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vala, Jorge |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caetano, António Vala, Jorge |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
- |
topic |
- |
description |
The social judgeability model states that in order to give a social judgement, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgement is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgements. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgement, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume they have sufficient information to make a social judgement. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower that the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, second group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgements relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability. |
publishDate |
1996 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1996-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587 https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v11i1.587 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/587 https://revista.appsicologia.org/index.php/rpsicologia/article/view/587/346 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 11 No. 1 (1996); 27-36 PSICOLOGIA; Vol. 11 N.º 1 (1996); 27-36 2183-2471 0874-2049 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134657445363712 |