Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amador, Filomena
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Martinho, Ana Paula, Bacelar-Nicolau, Paula, Caeiro, Sandra, Oliveira, Carla Padrel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/21703
Resumo: Universities are an important part of the process of change taking place in society. However, this is often overshadowed by these institutions giving priority to technocratic models in the relationship between science and society. In this context, according to Habermas, theories can serve to clarify practical questions and guide praxis into the right actions (social emancipation and rational autonomy). Habermas introduces the need to evaluate the particular contexts in which scientific arguments are made and assessed. The aim of this study was to develop a set of assessment criteria for education for sustainable development in higher education curricula. These were developed in line with Habermas by introducing further adaptions within the context of education for sustainable development. These criteria were tested in a blended learning master’s programme in Environmental Citizenship and Participation at the Universidade Aberta, Portugal. The following research tools were used as follows: (i) a questionnaire survey to the graduates; (ii) content analysis applied to the information guide and to the abstracts of the dissertations that were produced. The case study revealed that an absence of theoretical frameworks could lead to inconsistencies between theory and praxis. Improvements to curricula are then drawn from this study.
id RCAP_893a45a3794728161c5c0b3b3b782e8c
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/21703
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxiseducation for sustainable developmenthigher educationtheory of knowledge-constitutive interestsUniversities are an important part of the process of change taking place in society. However, this is often overshadowed by these institutions giving priority to technocratic models in the relationship between science and society. In this context, according to Habermas, theories can serve to clarify practical questions and guide praxis into the right actions (social emancipation and rational autonomy). Habermas introduces the need to evaluate the particular contexts in which scientific arguments are made and assessed. The aim of this study was to develop a set of assessment criteria for education for sustainable development in higher education curricula. These were developed in line with Habermas by introducing further adaptions within the context of education for sustainable development. These criteria were tested in a blended learning master’s programme in Environmental Citizenship and Participation at the Universidade Aberta, Portugal. The following research tools were used as follows: (i) a questionnaire survey to the graduates; (ii) content analysis applied to the information guide and to the abstracts of the dissertations that were produced. The case study revealed that an absence of theoretical frameworks could lead to inconsistencies between theory and praxis. Improvements to curricula are then drawn from this study.Taylor and Francis2018-01-23T12:35:08Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z2015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/21703eng0260-293810.1080/02602938.2015.1054783Amador, FilomenaMartinho, Ana PaulaBacelar-Nicolau, PaulaCaeiro, SandraOliveira, Carla Padrelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T11:32:41Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/21703Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:52:18.684510Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis
title Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis
spellingShingle Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis
Amador, Filomena
education for sustainable development
higher education
theory of knowledge-constitutive interests
title_short Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis
title_full Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis
title_fullStr Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis
title_full_unstemmed Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis
title_sort Education for sustainable development in higher education: evaluating coherence between theory and praxis
author Amador, Filomena
author_facet Amador, Filomena
Martinho, Ana Paula
Bacelar-Nicolau, Paula
Caeiro, Sandra
Oliveira, Carla Padrel
author_role author
author2 Martinho, Ana Paula
Bacelar-Nicolau, Paula
Caeiro, Sandra
Oliveira, Carla Padrel
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amador, Filomena
Martinho, Ana Paula
Bacelar-Nicolau, Paula
Caeiro, Sandra
Oliveira, Carla Padrel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv education for sustainable development
higher education
theory of knowledge-constitutive interests
topic education for sustainable development
higher education
theory of knowledge-constitutive interests
description Universities are an important part of the process of change taking place in society. However, this is often overshadowed by these institutions giving priority to technocratic models in the relationship between science and society. In this context, according to Habermas, theories can serve to clarify practical questions and guide praxis into the right actions (social emancipation and rational autonomy). Habermas introduces the need to evaluate the particular contexts in which scientific arguments are made and assessed. The aim of this study was to develop a set of assessment criteria for education for sustainable development in higher education curricula. These were developed in line with Habermas by introducing further adaptions within the context of education for sustainable development. These criteria were tested in a blended learning master’s programme in Environmental Citizenship and Participation at the Universidade Aberta, Portugal. The following research tools were used as follows: (i) a questionnaire survey to the graduates; (ii) content analysis applied to the information guide and to the abstracts of the dissertations that were produced. The case study revealed that an absence of theoretical frameworks could lead to inconsistencies between theory and praxis. Improvements to curricula are then drawn from this study.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015
2018-01-23T12:35:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/21703
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/21703
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0260-2938
10.1080/02602938.2015.1054783
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137573044486144