Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Machado, P
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Pereira da Silva, JA
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/321
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: Although several algorithms have been proposed to select postmenopausal women PMW for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry DEXA measurements information on their utility in clinical practice is scarce. Our aim was to assess the utility and the economic repercussion of the use of five of these algorithms in Portuguese postmenopausal women. METHODS: We included 588 PMW and selected five simple algorithms ORAI ABONE Body Weight Criterion OSTA and a modified version of OSTA (OST). Sensitivities specificities predictive values areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and economic estimates were computed. RESULTS: Sensitivities ranged between 71.2%-80.8% and AUROC between 0.611-0.674. In PMW aged > or = 65 years (Y) the use of any of the algorithms would cause extra costs or a residual saving. In PMW aged > or = 55 and < 65Y considering total savings ABONE had the best performance but considering savings per preventable fracture, ORAI assumed the lead, followed by BWC. In the age group > or = 40 and < 55Y, the most profitable option considering total savings would be not doing DEXA to anyone; considering savings per preventable fracture, BWC figures as the most useful. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the validity of all the selected tools as useful algorithms to select PMW for DEXA. On the basis of our results and considering the importance of simplicity in the applicability of an algorithm we would suggest the following strategy in Portuguese PMW: 1) Aged > or = 65Y: perform DEXA irrespective of other risk factors. 2) Aged < 65Y: perform DEXA if body weight < 70Kg.
id RCAP_89618c1bd84ddc6a0a659f9af9710846
oai_identifier_str oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/321
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesasPerformance of decision algorithms for the identification of low bone mineral density in portuguese postmenopausal womenDensidade ÓsseaOsteoporoseAlgoritmosOBJECTIVES: Although several algorithms have been proposed to select postmenopausal women PMW for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry DEXA measurements information on their utility in clinical practice is scarce. Our aim was to assess the utility and the economic repercussion of the use of five of these algorithms in Portuguese postmenopausal women. METHODS: We included 588 PMW and selected five simple algorithms ORAI ABONE Body Weight Criterion OSTA and a modified version of OSTA (OST). Sensitivities specificities predictive values areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and economic estimates were computed. RESULTS: Sensitivities ranged between 71.2%-80.8% and AUROC between 0.611-0.674. In PMW aged > or = 65 years (Y) the use of any of the algorithms would cause extra costs or a residual saving. In PMW aged > or = 55 and < 65Y considering total savings ABONE had the best performance but considering savings per preventable fracture, ORAI assumed the lead, followed by BWC. In the age group > or = 40 and < 55Y, the most profitable option considering total savings would be not doing DEXA to anyone; considering savings per preventable fracture, BWC figures as the most useful. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the validity of all the selected tools as useful algorithms to select PMW for DEXA. On the basis of our results and considering the importance of simplicity in the applicability of an algorithm we would suggest the following strategy in Portuguese PMW: 1) Aged > or = 65Y: perform DEXA irrespective of other risk factors. 2) Aged < 65Y: perform DEXA if body weight < 70Kg.Sociedade Portuguesa de ReumatologiaRIHUCMachado, PPereira da Silva, JA2008-12-11T14:51:42Z20082008-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/321porActa Reumatol Port. 2008 Jul-Sep;33(3):314-28info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:21:28Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/321Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:03:07.757285Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas
Performance of decision algorithms for the identification of low bone mineral density in portuguese postmenopausal women
title Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas
spellingShingle Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas
Machado, P
Densidade Óssea
Osteoporose
Algoritmos
title_short Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas
title_full Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas
title_fullStr Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas
title_full_unstemmed Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas
title_sort Desempenho de algoritmos de avaliação do risco osteoporótico em mulheres pós-menopáusicas portuguesas
author Machado, P
author_facet Machado, P
Pereira da Silva, JA
author_role author
author2 Pereira da Silva, JA
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RIHUC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado, P
Pereira da Silva, JA
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Densidade Óssea
Osteoporose
Algoritmos
topic Densidade Óssea
Osteoporose
Algoritmos
description OBJECTIVES: Although several algorithms have been proposed to select postmenopausal women PMW for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry DEXA measurements information on their utility in clinical practice is scarce. Our aim was to assess the utility and the economic repercussion of the use of five of these algorithms in Portuguese postmenopausal women. METHODS: We included 588 PMW and selected five simple algorithms ORAI ABONE Body Weight Criterion OSTA and a modified version of OSTA (OST). Sensitivities specificities predictive values areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and economic estimates were computed. RESULTS: Sensitivities ranged between 71.2%-80.8% and AUROC between 0.611-0.674. In PMW aged > or = 65 years (Y) the use of any of the algorithms would cause extra costs or a residual saving. In PMW aged > or = 55 and < 65Y considering total savings ABONE had the best performance but considering savings per preventable fracture, ORAI assumed the lead, followed by BWC. In the age group > or = 40 and < 55Y, the most profitable option considering total savings would be not doing DEXA to anyone; considering savings per preventable fracture, BWC figures as the most useful. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the validity of all the selected tools as useful algorithms to select PMW for DEXA. On the basis of our results and considering the importance of simplicity in the applicability of an algorithm we would suggest the following strategy in Portuguese PMW: 1) Aged > or = 65Y: perform DEXA irrespective of other risk factors. 2) Aged < 65Y: perform DEXA if body weight < 70Kg.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-11T14:51:42Z
2008
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/321
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/321
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Reumatol Port. 2008 Jul-Sep;33(3):314-28
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131696178659328