SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ventura, Tiago
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Lopes, Maria do Carmo, Costa Ferreira, Brigida, Khouri, Leila
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13918
Resumo: Aim In this work, a graphical method for radiotherapy treatment plan assessment and comparison, named SPIDERplan, is proposed. It aims to support plan approval allowing independent and consistent comparisons of different treatment techniques, algorithms or treatment planning systems. Background Optimized plans from modern radiotherapy are not easy to evaluate and compare because of their inherent multicriterial nature. The clinical decision on the best treatment plan is mostly based on subjective options. Materials and methods SPIDERplan combines a graphical analysis with a scoring index. Customized radar plots based on the categorization of structures into groups and on the determination of individual structures scores are generated. To each group and structure, an angular amplitude is assigned expressing the clinical importance defined by the radiation oncologist. Completing the graphical evaluation, a global plan score, based on the structures score and their clinical weights, is determined. After a necessary clinical validation of the group weights, SPIDERplan efficacy, to compare and rank different plans, was tested through a planning exercise where plans had been generated for a nasal cavity case using different treatment planning systems. Results SPIDERplan method was applied to the dose metrics achieved by the nasal cavity test plans. The generated diagrams and scores successfully ranked the plans according to the prescribed dose objectives and constraints and the radiation oncologist priorities, after a necessary clinical validation process. Conclusions SPIDERplan enables a fast and consistent evaluation of plan quality considering all targets and organs at risk.
id RCAP_8a16f5088b6a710290b6de055a8500bd
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13918
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessmentPlan approval supportPlan scoringTreatment planningRadiation therapyAim In this work, a graphical method for radiotherapy treatment plan assessment and comparison, named SPIDERplan, is proposed. It aims to support plan approval allowing independent and consistent comparisons of different treatment techniques, algorithms or treatment planning systems. Background Optimized plans from modern radiotherapy are not easy to evaluate and compare because of their inherent multicriterial nature. The clinical decision on the best treatment plan is mostly based on subjective options. Materials and methods SPIDERplan combines a graphical analysis with a scoring index. Customized radar plots based on the categorization of structures into groups and on the determination of individual structures scores are generated. To each group and structure, an angular amplitude is assigned expressing the clinical importance defined by the radiation oncologist. Completing the graphical evaluation, a global plan score, based on the structures score and their clinical weights, is determined. After a necessary clinical validation of the group weights, SPIDERplan efficacy, to compare and rank different plans, was tested through a planning exercise where plans had been generated for a nasal cavity case using different treatment planning systems. Results SPIDERplan method was applied to the dose metrics achieved by the nasal cavity test plans. The generated diagrams and scores successfully ranked the plans according to the prescribed dose objectives and constraints and the radiation oncologist priorities, after a necessary clinical validation process. Conclusions SPIDERplan enables a fast and consistent evaluation of plan quality considering all targets and organs at risk.ElsevierRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoVentura, TiagoLopes, Maria do CarmoCosta Ferreira, BrigidaKhouri, Leila2019-06-07T12:31:37Z20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13918eng10.1016/j.rpor.2016.07.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T12:56:19Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13918Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:33:46.725020Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
title SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
spellingShingle SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
Ventura, Tiago
Plan approval support
Plan scoring
Treatment planning
Radiation therapy
title_short SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
title_full SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
title_fullStr SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
title_full_unstemmed SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
title_sort SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
author Ventura, Tiago
author_facet Ventura, Tiago
Lopes, Maria do Carmo
Costa Ferreira, Brigida
Khouri, Leila
author_role author
author2 Lopes, Maria do Carmo
Costa Ferreira, Brigida
Khouri, Leila
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ventura, Tiago
Lopes, Maria do Carmo
Costa Ferreira, Brigida
Khouri, Leila
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plan approval support
Plan scoring
Treatment planning
Radiation therapy
topic Plan approval support
Plan scoring
Treatment planning
Radiation therapy
description Aim In this work, a graphical method for radiotherapy treatment plan assessment and comparison, named SPIDERplan, is proposed. It aims to support plan approval allowing independent and consistent comparisons of different treatment techniques, algorithms or treatment planning systems. Background Optimized plans from modern radiotherapy are not easy to evaluate and compare because of their inherent multicriterial nature. The clinical decision on the best treatment plan is mostly based on subjective options. Materials and methods SPIDERplan combines a graphical analysis with a scoring index. Customized radar plots based on the categorization of structures into groups and on the determination of individual structures scores are generated. To each group and structure, an angular amplitude is assigned expressing the clinical importance defined by the radiation oncologist. Completing the graphical evaluation, a global plan score, based on the structures score and their clinical weights, is determined. After a necessary clinical validation of the group weights, SPIDERplan efficacy, to compare and rank different plans, was tested through a planning exercise where plans had been generated for a nasal cavity case using different treatment planning systems. Results SPIDERplan method was applied to the dose metrics achieved by the nasal cavity test plans. The generated diagrams and scores successfully ranked the plans according to the prescribed dose objectives and constraints and the radiation oncologist priorities, after a necessary clinical validation process. Conclusions SPIDERplan enables a fast and consistent evaluation of plan quality considering all targets and organs at risk.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-06-07T12:31:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13918
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13918
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.07.002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817553835388829696