Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1996 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20491996000100002 |
Resumo: | The social judgeability model States that in order to give a social judgment, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgment is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgments. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgment, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors, may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume the have sufficient information to make a social judgment. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower than the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, secong group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgments relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability. |
id |
RCAP_8a778bcf14c6969717052470d465f813 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0874-20491996000100002 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeabilityThe social judgeability model States that in order to give a social judgment, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgment is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgments. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgment, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors, may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume the have sufficient information to make a social judgment. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower than the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, secong group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgments relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability.Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP)Edições Colibri1996-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20491996000100002Psicologia v.11 n.1 1996reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20491996000100002Caetano,AntónioVala,Jorgeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:13:22Zoai:scielo:S0874-20491996000100002Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:23:44.144193Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
spellingShingle |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability Caetano,António |
title_short |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title_full |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title_fullStr |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
title_sort |
Effects of the social interaction context on social judgeability |
author |
Caetano,António |
author_facet |
Caetano,António Vala,Jorge |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vala,Jorge |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caetano,António Vala,Jorge |
description |
The social judgeability model States that in order to give a social judgment, people need to feel that they are in a position to judge. To give a social judgment is not only a question of integrating individual and categorical information about the target. It also depends upon the relationship between the judges and their judgments. Within the pragmatic context surrounding any social judgment, perceivers have to consider its social validity following their theories about that relation. Some factors, may increase this sense of social validity. According to the social judgeability model, having status may induce people to assume the have sufficient information to make a social judgment. An experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis, manipulating the position status of the judges: higher, equal or lower than the alvo. Two groups of students have participated in this study (first group N=63, secong group N=60). Results show that subjects with higher position status reported greater confidence in their judgments relatively to other subjects. These results are discussed within the framework of impression formation and social judgeability. |
publishDate |
1996 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1996-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20491996000100002 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20491996000100002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20491996000100002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP) Edições Colibri |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP) Edições Colibri |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia v.11 n.1 1996 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137316692819968 |