The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/115891 |
Resumo: | The value‐based perspective emphasizes the importance of both value creation and bargaining for firm performance. While formal theoretical work has focused on value creation strategies, empirical evidence suggests that substantial performance differences also arise from heterogeneity in bargaining. We develop a model where rival firms choose value‐based innovation strategies to enhance either value creation or bargaining capabilities. We show a tendency for homogeneous strategy choices, with coordination on bargaining promoting firm value capture at the expense of overall industry value creation. We identify conditions for strategic heterogeneity, wherein a firm enhancing its bargaining capability risks the sustainability of its competitive advantage. Our model incorporates a natural distinction between incremental and radical value‐creating innovations, which influences the risk‐return tradeoffs faced by firms in their strategies. |
id |
RCAP_8f43d95f1565db4d261219b591a0bd2c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/115891 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalryWhether to enhance value creation or bargaining capabilitiesbargaining capabilitybiform gamesfirm heterogeneitysustainability of competitive advantagevalue-based innovation strategiesThe value‐based perspective emphasizes the importance of both value creation and bargaining for firm performance. While formal theoretical work has focused on value creation strategies, empirical evidence suggests that substantial performance differences also arise from heterogeneity in bargaining. We develop a model where rival firms choose value‐based innovation strategies to enhance either value creation or bargaining capabilities. We show a tendency for homogeneous strategy choices, with coordination on bargaining promoting firm value capture at the expense of overall industry value creation. We identify conditions for strategic heterogeneity, wherein a firm enhancing its bargaining capability risks the sustainability of its competitive advantage. Our model incorporates a natural distinction between incremental and radical value‐creating innovations, which influences the risk‐return tradeoffs faced by firms in their strategies.NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE)RUNCosta, Afonso AlmeidaZemsky, Peter2023-05-01T00:31:43Z2021-112021-11-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/115891eng0143-2095PURE: 29297164https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3282info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:58:28Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/115891Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:42:52.499696Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry Whether to enhance value creation or bargaining capabilities |
title |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry |
spellingShingle |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry Costa, Afonso Almeida bargaining capability biform games firm heterogeneity sustainability of competitive advantage value-based innovation strategies |
title_short |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry |
title_full |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry |
title_fullStr |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry |
title_full_unstemmed |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry |
title_sort |
The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry |
author |
Costa, Afonso Almeida |
author_facet |
Costa, Afonso Almeida Zemsky, Peter |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zemsky, Peter |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Afonso Almeida Zemsky, Peter |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bargaining capability biform games firm heterogeneity sustainability of competitive advantage value-based innovation strategies |
topic |
bargaining capability biform games firm heterogeneity sustainability of competitive advantage value-based innovation strategies |
description |
The value‐based perspective emphasizes the importance of both value creation and bargaining for firm performance. While formal theoretical work has focused on value creation strategies, empirical evidence suggests that substantial performance differences also arise from heterogeneity in bargaining. We develop a model where rival firms choose value‐based innovation strategies to enhance either value creation or bargaining capabilities. We show a tendency for homogeneous strategy choices, with coordination on bargaining promoting firm value capture at the expense of overall industry value creation. We identify conditions for strategic heterogeneity, wherein a firm enhancing its bargaining capability risks the sustainability of its competitive advantage. Our model incorporates a natural distinction between incremental and radical value‐creating innovations, which influences the risk‐return tradeoffs faced by firms in their strategies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z 2023-05-01T00:31:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/115891 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/115891 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0143-2095 PURE: 29297164 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3282 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138039791878144 |