Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.458 |
Resumo: | Using the 2009 and 2014 European Election Studies (EES), we explore the effect of the economy on the vote in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections. The paper demonstrates that the economy did influence voters in both contests. However, its impact was heterogeneous across the two elections and between countries. While assessments of the economy directly motivated voters in 2009 by 2014 economic appraisals were conditioned by how much responsibility voters felt the national government had for the state of the economy, implying a shift in calculus between the two elections. The analysis suggests that voters in 2009 were simply reacting to the economic tsunami that was the Global Financial Crisis, with motivations primarily driven by the unfavourable economic conditions countries faced. But in 2014, evaluations were conditioned by judgments about responsibility for the economy, suggesting a more conscious holding to account of the government. Our paper also reveals cross-country differences in the influence of the economy on vote. Attribution of responsibility and economic evaluations had a more potent impact on support for the government in bailout countries compared to non-bailout countries in 2014. Our findings demonstrate the importance of economy on vote in EP elections but also highlight how its impact on vote can vary based on context. |
id |
RCAP_905a894519d6c037341b75e94acc1a2f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/458 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Electionsbailout; economic voting; European elections; global financial crisis; perceptions of economic responsibilityUsing the 2009 and 2014 European Election Studies (EES), we explore the effect of the economy on the vote in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections. The paper demonstrates that the economy did influence voters in both contests. However, its impact was heterogeneous across the two elections and between countries. While assessments of the economy directly motivated voters in 2009 by 2014 economic appraisals were conditioned by how much responsibility voters felt the national government had for the state of the economy, implying a shift in calculus between the two elections. The analysis suggests that voters in 2009 were simply reacting to the economic tsunami that was the Global Financial Crisis, with motivations primarily driven by the unfavourable economic conditions countries faced. But in 2014, evaluations were conditioned by judgments about responsibility for the economy, suggesting a more conscious holding to account of the government. Our paper also reveals cross-country differences in the influence of the economy on vote. Attribution of responsibility and economic evaluations had a more potent impact on support for the government in bailout countries compared to non-bailout countries in 2014. Our findings demonstrate the importance of economy on vote in EP elections but also highlight how its impact on vote can vary based on context.Cogitatio2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.458oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/458Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 145-1662183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/458https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.458https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/458/458Copyright (c) 2016 Martin Okolikj, Stephen Quinlanhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOkolikj, MartinQuinlan, Stephen2022-12-22T15:15:47Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/458Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:13.247575Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections |
title |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections |
spellingShingle |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections Okolikj, Martin bailout; economic voting; European elections; global financial crisis; perceptions of economic responsibility |
title_short |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections |
title_full |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections |
title_fullStr |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections |
title_sort |
Context Matters: Economic Voting in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament Elections |
author |
Okolikj, Martin |
author_facet |
Okolikj, Martin Quinlan, Stephen |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Quinlan, Stephen |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Okolikj, Martin Quinlan, Stephen |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bailout; economic voting; European elections; global financial crisis; perceptions of economic responsibility |
topic |
bailout; economic voting; European elections; global financial crisis; perceptions of economic responsibility |
description |
Using the 2009 and 2014 European Election Studies (EES), we explore the effect of the economy on the vote in the 2009 and 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections. The paper demonstrates that the economy did influence voters in both contests. However, its impact was heterogeneous across the two elections and between countries. While assessments of the economy directly motivated voters in 2009 by 2014 economic appraisals were conditioned by how much responsibility voters felt the national government had for the state of the economy, implying a shift in calculus between the two elections. The analysis suggests that voters in 2009 were simply reacting to the economic tsunami that was the Global Financial Crisis, with motivations primarily driven by the unfavourable economic conditions countries faced. But in 2014, evaluations were conditioned by judgments about responsibility for the economy, suggesting a more conscious holding to account of the government. Our paper also reveals cross-country differences in the influence of the economy on vote. Attribution of responsibility and economic evaluations had a more potent impact on support for the government in bailout countries compared to non-bailout countries in 2014. Our findings demonstrate the importance of economy on vote in EP elections but also highlight how its impact on vote can vary based on context. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.458 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/458 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.458 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/458 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/458 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.458 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/458/458 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Martin Okolikj, Stephen Quinlan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Martin Okolikj, Stephen Quinlan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 145-166 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130668087640064 |